Yoon Woong, Kim Seul Kee, Park Man Seok, Kim Byeong Chae, Kang Heoung Keun
*Department of Radiology and ‡Department of Neurology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hospital, Dong-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Neurosurgery. 2015 Jun;76(6):680-6; discussion 686. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000694.
The importance of underlying atherosclerotic intracranial artery stenosis (ICAS) in hyperacute stroke patients who receive endovascular therapy remains unknown.
To report and compare the outcomes of multimodal endovascular therapy in patients with hyperacute stroke with and without underlying ICAS.
A total of 172 consecutive patients with acute stroke were treated with multimodal endovascular therapy that was heavily weighted toward stent-based thrombectomy. Patients with ICAS underwent emergent intracranial angioplasty or stenting. Data were compared between patients with and without ICAS. Revascularization was defined as Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade ≥2b. A favorable outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 or equal to the premorbid modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months.
ICAS was responsible for acute ischemic symptoms in 40 patients (22.9%). Revascularization and favorable outcome occurred more frequently in the ICAS group than in the control group (95% vs 81.8%, P = .04; 65% vs 40.2%, P = .01, respectively). The median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was significantly lower in the ICAS group compared with the control group (10 vs 12; P = .002). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the rates of symptomatic hemorrhage and mortality.
Emergent intracranial angioplasty with or without stenting is safe and feasible and yields a high rate of revascularization and favorable outcome in patients with hyperacute stroke and underlying ICAS. Patients with underlying ICAS have less severe infarctions at presentation and higher successful revascularization after multimodal endovascular therapy in the setting of hyperacute stroke compared with those with other stroke subtypes.
在接受血管内治疗的超急性卒中患者中,潜在动脉粥样硬化性颅内动脉狭窄(ICAS)的重要性尚不清楚。
报告并比较有和没有潜在ICAS的超急性卒中患者多模式血管内治疗的结果。
共有172例连续急性卒中患者接受了多模式血管内治疗,该治疗主要侧重于基于支架的血栓切除术。患有ICAS的患者接受了紧急颅内血管成形术或支架置入术。对有和没有ICAS的患者的数据进行了比较。血管再通定义为脑梗死溶栓分级≥2b级。良好结局定义为改良Rankin量表评分≤2或在3个月时等于病前改良Rankin量表评分。
40例患者(22.9%)的急性缺血症状由ICAS引起。ICAS组的血管再通和良好结局发生率高于对照组(分别为95%对81.8%,P = 0.04;65%对40.2%,P = 0.01)。与对照组相比,ICAS组的基线美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分中位数显著更低(10对12;P = 0.002)。两组在症状性出血率和死亡率方面无显著差异。
无论有无支架置入的紧急颅内血管成形术在患有超急性卒中和潜在ICAS的患者中是安全可行的,并且血管再通率和良好结局率很高。与其他卒中亚型的患者相比,患有潜在ICAS的患者在超急性卒中情况下就诊时梗死不太严重,多模式血管内治疗后血管再通成功率更高。