• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

IRCAD 关于安全腹腔镜胆囊切除术的建议。

IRCAD recommendation on safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

出版信息

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017 Nov;24(11):603-615. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.491. Epub 2017 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1002/jhbp.491
PMID:29076265
Abstract

An expert recommendation conference was conducted to identify factors associated with adverse events during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with the goal of deriving expert recommendations for the reduction of biliary and vascular injury. Nineteen hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeons from high-volume surgery centers in six countries comprised the Research Institute Against Cancer of the Digestive System (IRCAD) Recommendations Group. Systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase was conducted. Using nominal group technique, structured group meetings were held to identify key items for safer LC. Consensus was achieved when 80% of respondents ranked an item as 1 or 2 (Likert scale 1-4). Seventy-one IRCAD HPB course participants assessed the expert recommendations which were compared to responses of 37 general surgery course participants. The IRCAD recommendations were structured in seven statements. The key topics included exposure of the operative field, appropriate use of energy device and establishment of the critical view of safety (CVS), systematic preoperative imaging, cholangiogram and alternative techniques, role of partial and dome-down (fundus-first) cholecystectomy. Highest consensus was achieved on the importance of the CVS as well as dome-down technique and partial cholecystectomy as alternative techniques. The put forward IRCAD recommendations may help to promote safe surgical practice of LC and initiate specific training to avoid adverse events.

摘要

召开了专家推荐会议,以确定与腹腔镜胆囊切除术 (LC) 相关的不良事件的相关因素,旨在得出减少胆道和血管损伤的专家建议。来自六个国家的 19 名高容量手术中心的肝胆胰外科医生组成了消化系统癌症研究所(IRCAD)推荐组。对 PubMed、Cochrane 和 Embase 进行了系统搜索。使用名义群体技术,召开了结构化的小组会议,以确定更安全的 LC 的关键项目。当 80%的受访者将一项指标评为 1 或 2 时(李克特量表 1-4),就达成了共识。71 名 IRCAD HPB 课程参与者评估了专家建议,并将其与 37 名普通外科课程参与者的回应进行了比较。IRCAD 建议分为七个陈述。关键主题包括手术视野的暴露、能量设备的合理使用和建立安全关键视图 (CVS)、术前系统成像、胆管造影和替代技术、部分胆囊切除术和穹顶向下(底-first)胆囊切除术的作用。CVS 的重要性以及穹顶向下技术和部分胆囊切除术作为替代技术得到了最高的共识。提出的 IRCAD 建议可能有助于促进 LC 的安全手术实践,并启动专门培训以避免不良事件。

相似文献

1
IRCAD recommendation on safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy.IRCAD 关于安全腹腔镜胆囊切除术的建议。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017 Nov;24(11):603-615. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.491. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
2
SAGES expert Delphi consensus: critical factors for safe surgical practice in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.SAGES专家德尔菲共识:腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全手术操作的关键因素
Surg Endosc. 2015 Nov;29(11):3074-85. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4079-z. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
3
Safe Cholecystectomy Multi-society Practice Guideline and State of the Art Consensus Conference on Prevention of Bile Duct Injury During Cholecystectomy.安全胆囊切除术多学会实践指南和预防胆囊切除术中胆管损伤的最新共识会议。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jul;272(1):3-23. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003791.
4
Increasing resident utilization and recognition of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study from an academic medical center.提高住院医师在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中对安全关键视角的利用率和认知度:一项来自学术医疗中心的试点研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1627-1635. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5150-0. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
5
Improving attainment of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.提高腹腔镜胆囊切除术时安全关键视角的达成率。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):4115-4123. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07178-y. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
6
Insufficient safety measures reported in operation notes of complicated laparoscopic cholecystectomies.复杂腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术记录中报告的安全措施不足。
Surgery. 2014 Mar;155(3):384-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Oct 12.
7
Safe cholecystectomy multi-society practice guideline and state-of-the-art consensus conference on prevention of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.安全胆囊切除术多学会实践指南和预防胆囊切除术中胆管损伤的最新共识会议。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):2827-2855. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07568-7. Epub 2020 May 12.
8
The role of ERCP in patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后患者中的作用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1994 Sep;89(9):1523-7.
9
Single-step treatment of gall bladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique.胆囊和胆管结石的单步治疗:一种内镜-腹腔镜联合技术。
Int J Surg. 2009 Aug;7(4):338-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 May 27.
10
Educational Scoring System in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is It the Right Time to Standardize?腹腔镜胆囊切除术的教学评分系统:是否到了标准化的时机?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Feb 23;59(3):446. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030446.

引用本文的文献

1
Short-interval intravenous indocyanine green administration in pediatric laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective evaluation of visualization and safety.小儿腹腔镜胆囊切除术中短间隔静脉注射吲哚菁绿:可视化与安全性的前瞻性评估
Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Aug 26;41(1):269. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06172-x.
2
Systematic review on the use of artificial intelligence to identify anatomical structures during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a tool towards the future.关于在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中使用人工智能识别解剖结构的系统评价:迈向未来的工具。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Mar 18;410(1):101. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03651-6.
3
Endoscapes, a critical view of safety and surgical scene segmentation dataset for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
内镜视野,腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全与手术场景分割数据集的批判性审视。
Sci Data. 2025 Feb 25;12(1):331. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-04642-4.
4
DOse and administration Time of Indocyanine Green in near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DOTIG): a randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间近红外荧光胆管造影术中吲哚菁绿的剂量与给药时间(DOTIG):一项随机临床试验
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1778-1792. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11481-8. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
5
Indocyanine Blue (ICB) as a Functional Alternative to Indocyanine Green (ICG) for Enhanced 700 nm NIR Imaging.吲哚菁蓝(ICB)作为吲哚菁绿(ICG)的功能替代物用于增强700纳米近红外成像
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Dec 18;25(24):13547. doi: 10.3390/ijms252413547.
6
Critical view of safety approach vs. infundibular technique in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which one is safer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中安全方法与漏斗技术的批判性观点,哪种更安全?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2025 Jan;77(1):33-45. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-02029-5. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
7
Intravenous injection versus transhepatic intracholecystic injection of indocyanine green (ICG) to outline biliary tree during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.静脉注射与经肝内胆囊内注射吲哚菁绿(ICG)在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中勾画胆管树。
BMC Surg. 2024 Oct 25;24(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02612-y.
8
Multicenter analysis of the efficacy of early cholecystectomy and preoperative cholecystostomy for severe acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study of data from the multi-institutional database of the Hiroshima Surgical Study Group of Clinical Oncology.早期胆囊切除术与术前胆囊造瘘术治疗重症急性胆囊炎疗效的多中心分析:一项基于广岛临床肿瘤外科研究组多机构数据库数据的回顾性研究
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03420-7.
9
Safety of cholecystectomy performed by surgeons who prefer fundus first versus surgeons who prefer a standard laparoscopic approach.偏好先从胆囊底部开始手术的外科医生与偏好标准腹腔镜手术入路的外科医生进行胆囊切除术的安全性比较。
Surg Open Sci. 2024 Apr 25;19:141-145. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.04.004. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
When Critical View of Safety Fails: A Practical Perspective on Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.当关键安全视角失效时:腹腔镜胆囊切除术困难的实用观点。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Aug 19;59(8):1491. doi: 10.3390/medicina59081491.