• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者和肿瘤护士对晚期黑色素瘤治疗方案选择的偏好:一项离散选择实验。

Patient and Oncology Nurse Preferences for the Treatment Options in Advanced Melanoma: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

机构信息

Author Affiliations: Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey (Drs Liu and Ebbinghaus); Kantar Health, New York, New York (Dr Witt, Ms Beyer, and Mr Basurto); and Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida (Dr Joseph).

出版信息

Cancer Nurs. 2019 Jan/Feb;42(1):E52-E59. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000557.

DOI:10.1097/NCC.0000000000000557
PMID:29076867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6286876/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding the perceptions of patients and oncology nurses about the relative importance of benefits and risks associated with newer treatments of advanced melanoma can help to inform clinical decision-making.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to quantify and compare the views of patients and oncology nurses regarding the importance of attributes of treatments of advanced melanoma.

METHODS

A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted in US-based oncology nurses and patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma. Patients and nurses were enlisted through online panels. In a series of scenarios, respondents had to choose between 2 hypothetical treatments, each with 7 attributes: mode of administration (MoA), dosing schedule (DS), median duration of therapy (DoT), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs). Hierarchical Bayesian logistic regression models were used to estimate preference weights.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients with advanced melanoma and 150 oncology nurses participated. The relative importance estimates of attributes by patients and nurses, respectively, were as follows: OS, 33% and 28%; AEs, 29% and 26%; ORR, 25% and 27%; PFS, 12% and 15%; DS, 2% and 3%; DoT, 0% and 0%; and MoA, 0% and 0%.

CONCLUSION

Both patients and oncology nurses valued OS, ORR, and AEs as the most important treatment attributes for advanced melanoma, followed by PFS, whereas DS, DoT, and MoA were given less value in their treatment decisions.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Oncology nurses and patients have similar views on important treatment considerations for advanced melanoma, which can help build trust in shared decision-making.

摘要

背景

了解患者和肿瘤护士对晚期黑色素瘤新治疗方法相关益处和风险的相对重要性的看法,可以帮助为临床决策提供信息。

目的

本研究旨在量化和比较患者和肿瘤护士对晚期黑色素瘤治疗属性重要性的看法。

方法

在美国进行了一项基于离散选择实验(DCE)的研究,纳入了确诊为晚期黑色素瘤的肿瘤护士和患者。通过在线小组招募患者和护士。在一系列场景中,受访者必须在两种假设的治疗方法之间进行选择,每种方法都有 7 种属性:给药方式(MoA)、剂量方案(DS)、中位治疗持续时间(DoT)、客观缓解率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和 3 或 4 级不良事件(AEs)。使用分层贝叶斯逻辑回归模型来估计偏好权重。

结果

共有 200 名晚期黑色素瘤患者和 150 名肿瘤护士参与了研究。患者和护士对属性的相对重要性估计值分别为:OS,33%和 28%;AE,29%和 26%;ORR,25%和 27%;PFS,12%和 15%;DS,2%和 3%;DoT,0%和 0%;以及 MoA,0%和 0%。

结论

患者和肿瘤护士均将 OS、ORR 和 AE 视为晚期黑色素瘤最重要的治疗属性,其次是 PFS,而 DS、DoT 和 MoA 在治疗决策中受到的重视程度较低。

意义

肿瘤护士和患者对晚期黑色素瘤重要治疗考虑因素的看法相似,这有助于建立对共同决策的信任。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fcb/6286876/8fa897893d7e/ncc-42-e52-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fcb/6286876/1d650c629b7d/ncc-42-e52-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fcb/6286876/a7bfc58946c4/ncc-42-e52-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fcb/6286876/8fa897893d7e/ncc-42-e52-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fcb/6286876/1d650c629b7d/ncc-42-e52-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fcb/6286876/a7bfc58946c4/ncc-42-e52-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fcb/6286876/8fa897893d7e/ncc-42-e52-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient and Oncology Nurse Preferences for the Treatment Options in Advanced Melanoma: A Discrete Choice Experiment.患者和肿瘤护士对晚期黑色素瘤治疗方案选择的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Cancer Nurs. 2019 Jan/Feb;42(1):E52-E59. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000557.
2
Patient and oncologist preferences for attributes of treatments in advanced melanoma: a discrete choice experiment.晚期黑色素瘤患者和肿瘤学家对治疗属性的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Aug 14;11:1389-1399. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S140226. eCollection 2017.
3
Alignment of preferences in the treatment of multiple myeloma - a discrete choice experiment of patient, carer, physician, and nurse preferences.多发性骨髓瘤治疗偏好的一致性 - 基于患者、照顾者、医生和护士偏好的离散选择实验。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 11;20(1):546. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07018-6.
4
Understanding Clinician Preferences for Treatment Attributes in Oncology: A Discrete Choice Experiment of Oncologists' and Urologists' Preferences for First-Line Treatment of Locally Advanced/Unresectable Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in Five European Countries.了解肿瘤学临床医生对治疗属性的偏好:一项关于欧洲五个国家肿瘤学家和泌尿科医生对局部晚期/不可切除转移性尿路上皮癌一线治疗偏好的离散选择实验。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Aug;42(8):895-909. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01359-x. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
5
Patient Preferences in Adjuvant and Palliative Treatment of Advanced Melanoma: A Discrete Choice Experiment.患者对晚期黑色素瘤辅助和姑息治疗的偏好:离散选择实验。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2020 Mar 18;100(6):adv00083. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3422.
6
Preferences for Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Adults with Resected Stage III Melanoma-A Discrete Choice Experiment.成年人 III 期黑色素瘤切除术后辅助免疫治疗的偏好——离散选择实验。
Patient. 2023 Sep;16(5):497-513. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00635-w. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
7
Comparing the Relative Importance of Attributes of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treatments to Patients and Physicians in the United States: A Discrete-Choice Experiment.比较转移性肾细胞癌治疗在美国患者和医生中的属性相对重要性:一项离散选择实验。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Aug;36(8):973-986. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0640-7.
8
Valuing injection frequency and other attributes of type 2 diabetes treatments in Australia: a discrete choice experiment.评估澳大利亚2型糖尿病治疗的注射频率及其他属性:一项离散选择实验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 30;18(1):675. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3484-0.
9
Patient, Caregiver, and Nurse Preferences for Treatments for Bone Metastases from Solid Tumors.实体瘤骨转移治疗的患者、照护者及护士偏好
Patient. 2016 Aug;9(4):323-33. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0158-4.
10
Line of therapy and patient preferences regarding lung cancer treatment: a discrete-choice experiment.治疗方案选择和肺癌治疗相关的患者偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Apr;37(4):643-653. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1888707. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
CodeBreaK or code blue? Assessing sotorasib's vital signs in metastatic colorectal cancer.“代码破解”还是“蓝色代码”?评估索托拉西布在转移性结直肠癌中的生命体征
Cancer. 2025 Sep 1;131(17):e70056. doi: 10.1002/cncr.70056.
2
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
3
Preferences of melanoma patients to accept adjuvant therapy and toxicity - a qualitative substudy of the GerMelaTox-A project.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.离散选择实验分析的统计方法:药物经济学与结果研究国际协会联合分析良好研究实践特别工作组报告
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):300-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 12.
2
Immunotherapy Combined or Sequenced With Targeted Therapy in the Treatment of Solid Tumors: Current Perspectives.免疫疗法联合或序贯靶向治疗实体瘤的研究进展。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Feb 2;108(6):djv414. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv414. Print 2016 Jun.
3
Patient and nurse preferences for nurse handover-using preferences to inform policy: a discrete choice experiment protocol.
黑色素瘤患者接受辅助治疗和毒性的偏好——GerMelaTox-A项目的一项定性子研究
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Dec 4;151(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-06014-8.
4
Using Patient Preferences in Health Technology Assessment: Evaluating Quality-Adjusted Survival Equivalents (QASE) for the Quantification of Non-health Benefits.利用患者偏好进行卫生技术评估:评估用于量化非健康效益的质量调整生存等价物(QASE)。
Patient. 2024 May;17(3):229-237. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00676-9. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
5
Preferences of German and Swiss melanoma patients for toxicities versus melanoma recurrence during adjuvant treatment (GERMELATOX-A-trial).德国和瑞士黑色素瘤患者在辅助治疗期间对毒性与黑色素瘤复发的偏好(GERMELATOX-A 试验)。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct;149(13):11705-11718. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05027-z. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
6
Preferences for Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Adults with Resected Stage III Melanoma-A Discrete Choice Experiment.成年人 III 期黑色素瘤切除术后辅助免疫治疗的偏好——离散选择实验。
Patient. 2023 Sep;16(5):497-513. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00635-w. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
7
Patient Preferences for Treatment Outcomes in Oncology with a Focus on the Older Patient-A Systematic Review.肿瘤学中患者对治疗结果的偏好,重点关注老年患者——一项系统综述。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 23;14(5):1147. doi: 10.3390/cancers14051147.
8
A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Oncology Treatments.肿瘤治疗中离散选择实验的系统评价。
Patient. 2021 Nov;14(6):775-790. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00520-4. Epub 2021 May 5.
9
Understanding Treatment Strategies and Preferences in Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer From the Japanese Physician Perspective.从日本医生的角度理解非转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的治疗策略和偏好。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2021 Feb;7:302-310. doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00358.
10
The Value of Hope: Patients' and Physicians' Preferences for Survival in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.希望的价值:晚期非小细胞肺癌患者及医生对生存的偏好
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Oct 30;14:2093-2104. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S248295. eCollection 2020.
患者和护士对护士交接班的偏好——运用偏好为政策提供信息:一项离散选择实验方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 11;5(11):e008941. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008941.
4
Therapy preferences in melanoma treatment--willingness to pay and preference of quality versus length of life of patients, physicians and healthy controls.黑色素瘤治疗中的治疗偏好——患者、医生和健康对照者对支付意愿以及质量与生命长度的偏好
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 4;9(11):e111237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111237. eCollection 2014.
5
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:文献综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Sep;32(9):883-902. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x.
6
Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force.构建离散选择实验的实验设计:ISPOR 联合分析实验设计良好实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223.
7
The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda.以患者为中心的结果研究协会(PCORI)的国家研究重点及初步研究议程。
JAMA. 2012 Apr 18;307(15):1583-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.500.
8
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:文献综述。
Health Econ. 2012 Feb;21(2):145-72. doi: 10.1002/hec.1697. Epub 2010 Dec 19.
9
Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force.联合分析在健康领域的应用——检查表:ISPOR 联合分析实践良好研究报告任务组报告。
Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):403-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
10
The triple aim: care, health, and cost.三重目标:医疗、健康和成本。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):759-69. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759.