Janke Toni Maria, Moysig Laura, Blome Christine, Kähler Katharina C
Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany, Martinistraße 52, 20246.
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Dec 4;151(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-06014-8.
Targeted treatment and immunotherapy, both adjuvant treatment options, come with a certain toxicity and can cause severe side effects. To date, data about the underlying reasons for patients to accept or reject specific types of adjuvant therapy is scarce. Therefore, this study investigates the motives of melanoma patients for tolerating or rejecting adjuvant therapy and its side effects.
We conducted semi-structured interviews with a subsample of patients to investigate the underlying reasons for treatment decisions in a quantitative treatment-trade off study. Categorisation was conducted using qualitative content analysis.
The 17 participants had a mean age of 55.5 years and 12 were female. The final category system covered three clusters. The cluster "type of therapy and therapy process" described therapy-related aspects that affect acceptability of adjuvant treatments. Prospect of treatment benefit and side effects were important aspects. Route of administration and physician visits should be convenient. The cluster "way of living" described the influence that activities and circumstances of life organisation have on acceptability. Participants wished treatment to affect everyday life as little as possible. Maintaining sufficient quality of life was mentioned to be crucial. The cluster "emotions and feelings" described optimism and hope but also mental strain originating from possible treatment options.
Patients in our study indicate high willingness to undergo adjuvant therapy, even when facing toxicity. The evaluation of potential side effects and prospects of treatment benefit is highly individual. Therefore, it is important to consider personal patient preferences to make appropriate and shared decision-making.
靶向治疗和免疫治疗作为两种辅助治疗方案,都具有一定的毒性,可能会引起严重的副作用。迄今为止,关于患者接受或拒绝特定类型辅助治疗的根本原因的数据很少。因此,本研究调查黑色素瘤患者耐受或拒绝辅助治疗及其副作用的动机。
我们对一部分患者进行了半结构化访谈,以在一项定量治疗权衡研究中调查治疗决策的根本原因。使用定性内容分析法进行分类。
17名参与者的平均年龄为55.5岁,其中12名是女性。最终的分类系统涵盖三个类别。“治疗类型和治疗过程”类别描述了影响辅助治疗可接受性的治疗相关方面。治疗获益前景和副作用是重要方面。给药途径和就诊应方便。“生活方式”类别描述了生活活动和生活安排情况对可接受性的影响。参与者希望治疗对日常生活的影响尽可能小。保持足够的生活质量被认为至关重要。“情绪和感受”类别描述了乐观和希望,但也包括可能的治疗选择带来的精神压力。
我们研究中的患者表明,即使面临毒性,他们接受辅助治疗的意愿也很高。对潜在副作用和治疗获益前景的评估高度个体化。因此,考虑患者的个人偏好以做出适当的共同决策很重要。