From the Hôpitaux universitaires Paris-Sud, Hôpital de Bicêtre, service de réanimation médicale, 78, rue du Général Leclerc, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre F-94270, France.
Inserm UMR S_999, Univ Paris-Sud, 78, rue du Général Leclerc, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre F-94270, France.
Anesth Analg. 2018 Jun;126(6):1930-1933. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002527.
Monitoring cardiac output is of special interest for detecting early hemodynamic impairment and for guiding its treatment. Among the techniques that are available to monitor cardiac output, pressure waveform analysis estimates cardiac output from the shape of the arterial pressure curve. It is based on the general principle that the amplitude of the systolic part of the arterial curve is proportional to cardiac output and arterial compliance. Such an estimation of cardiac output has the advantage of being continuous and in real time. With "calibrated" devices, the initial estimation of cardiac output by pressure waveform analysis is calibrated by measurements of cardiac output made by transpulmonary thermal or lithium dilution. Later, at each time transpulmonary dilution is performed, the estimation by pressure waveform analysis, which may drift over time, is calibrated again. By contrast, uncalibrated devices do not use any independent measurement of cardiac output. Unlike calibrated devices, they can be plugged to any arterial catheter. Nevertheless, uncalibrated devices are not reliable in cases of significant short-term changes in arterial resistance, as for instance in patients undergoing liver surgery or those with vasodilatory shock receiving vasopressors. Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring is recommended for high-risk surgical patients since it reduces the number of complications in these patients. The pressure waveform analysis monitoring, especially with uncalibrated devices, is suitable for this purpose. In the intensive care setting, hemodynamic monitoring is recommended for patients with acute circulatory failure, who do not respond to initial therapy. Since these patients often experience large changes in arterial resistance, either spontaneously or due to vasoactive drugs, calibrated devices are more suitable in this context. Not only are they more reliable than uncalibrated devices but also they provide a comprehensive hemodynamic assessment through measurements of a variety of transpulmonary thermodilution-related variables. In this review, we summarize the characteristics of the monitoring devices using the pressure waveform analysis and discuss the appropriate use of different devices in the perioperative and intensive care unit settings.
监测心输出量对于早期血液动力学损伤的检测和指导其治疗具有特殊意义。在用于监测心输出量的技术中,压力波形分析通过动脉压力曲线的形状来估计心输出量。它基于这样一个普遍原理,即动脉曲线的收缩部分的幅度与心输出量和动脉顺应性成正比。这种心输出量的估计具有连续实时的优点。使用“校准”设备,压力波形分析的初始心输出量估计通过经肺热稀释或锂稀释测量进行校准。此后,每次进行经肺稀释时,压力波形分析的估计值都会再次根据时间进行校准,因为该估计值可能会随时间漂移。相比之下,未校准设备不使用任何独立的心输出量测量。与校准设备不同,它们可以连接到任何动脉导管。然而,在动脉阻力发生显著短期变化的情况下,例如在接受肝手术的患者或接受血管加压药的血管扩张性休克患者中,未校准设备不可靠。围手术期血流动力学监测推荐用于高危手术患者,因为它可减少这些患者的并发症数量。压力波形分析监测,特别是使用未校准设备,非常适合这种情况。在重症监护环境中,对于急性循环衰竭且对初始治疗无反应的患者,建议进行血流动力学监测。由于这些患者的动脉阻力经常会发生很大变化,无论是自发的还是由于血管活性药物引起的,因此在这种情况下更适合使用校准设备。它们不仅比未校准设备更可靠,而且还通过测量各种经肺热稀释相关变量提供全面的血流动力学评估。在这篇综述中,我们总结了使用压力波形分析的监测设备的特点,并讨论了在围手术期和重症监护病房环境中使用不同设备的适当方法。