Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA; Adhesive Dentistry Research Group, Department of Cariology, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Jan;77:557-565. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
The importance of the Dentin Enamel Junction (DEJ) to the durability of adhesive bonds to tooth structure is unclear. In fact, no investigation has been reported on contributions of the DEJ to the fatigue resistance of the bonded interface. In this study, the durability of adhesive bonds to tooth structure involving the DEJ was quantified and compared to that of adhesive bonds to enamel only, not including the DEJ. Two different configurations of enamel bonding were considered, including when tensile stress is focused on the outer enamel (occlusal configuration) or the inner decussated enamel (decussated configuration). The resistance to failure for all bonded interfaces was assessed under both static and cyclic loading to failure. Results showed that the durability of the bonded interfaces was primarily a function of their resistance to crack initiation and growth. The bonded interface strength involving the DEJ was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) greater than that of bonds to enamel only with occlusal configuration, under both static and cyclic loading. While the fatigue strength of bonds involving the DEJ was approximately 20% greater than that for enamel bonds with occlusal configuration (7.7MPa) it was lower than that of enamel with the decussated configuration. The DEJ deterred cracks from extending readily into the dentin but it did not prevent fatigue failure. These results suggest that the durability of bonds to enamel are most dependent on the enamel rod decussation and that the DEJ plays a minor role.
牙本质-釉质交界(DEJ)对牙体结构粘结耐久性的重要性尚不清楚。实际上,尚未有研究报道 DEJ 对粘结界面抗疲劳性能的贡献。本研究定量评估了包含 DEJ 的牙体结构粘结的耐久性,并与不包含 DEJ 的仅釉质粘结的耐久性进行了比较。考虑了两种不同的釉质粘结构型,包括当拉伸应力集中在釉质外层(咬合构型)或内部交叉釉质(交叉构型)时。所有粘结界面的失效抵抗能力均在静态和循环加载至失效条件下进行了评估。结果表明,粘结界面的耐久性主要取决于其对裂纹起始和扩展的抵抗力。在静态和循环加载条件下,包含 DEJ 的粘结界面的强度明显(p ≤ 0.05)大于仅含咬合构型釉质粘结的强度。虽然包含 DEJ 的粘结的疲劳强度比具有咬合构型的釉质粘结(7.7MPa)高约 20%,但低于具有交叉构型的釉质。DEJ 阻止裂纹迅速扩展到牙本质中,但不能防止疲劳失效。这些结果表明,釉质粘结的耐久性主要取决于釉柱交叉,而 DEJ 仅起次要作用。