• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive and robotic esophagectomy: state of the art.微创与机器人辅助食管切除术:现状
J Vis Surg. 2017 Sep 14;3:125. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.08.23. eCollection 2017.
2
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review.机器人辅助微创食管切除术与传统微创食管切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析与系统评价
Int J Med Robot. 2019 Jun;15(3):e1988. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1988. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
3
Robotic Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-analysis.机器人与传统微创食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jul 1;278(1):39-50. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005782. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
4
Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Postoperative Outcomes in a Nationwide Cohort.机器人辅助微创食管切除术:全国队列的术后结果。
J Surg Res. 2023 Mar;283:152-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.09.029. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
5
Outcomes of robotic esophagectomy.机器人辅助食管切除术的结果
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Oct;13(10):6163-6168. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2019-rts-07.
6
Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.机器人辅助微创食管癌根治术治疗食管癌术后肺部并发症发生率较低:与传统微创食管癌根治术的倾向评分匹配比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;28(2):639-647. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09081-6. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
7
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)与传统微创食管切除术(MIE)治疗食管癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Apr 15;33(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz060.
8
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy - our first experience.机器人辅助微创食管切除术——我们的首次经验。
Rozhl Chir. 2023;102(11):422-429. doi: 10.33699/PIS.2023.102.11.422-429.
9
Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy.机器人辅助微创食管切除术与微创食管切除术的比较
Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 15;13:1293645. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1293645. eCollection 2023.
10
Long-term survival outcomes associated with robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer.机器人辅助微创食管癌根治术(RAMIE)治疗食管癌的长期生存结果。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):4018-4027. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09588-x. Epub 2022 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Crystalloid volume versus catecholamines for management of hemorrhagic shock during esophagectomy: assessment of microcirculatory tissue oxygenation of the gastric conduit in a porcine model using hyperspectral imaging - an experimental study.晶体液容量与儿茶酚胺在食管切除术治疗失血性休克中的应用:使用高光谱成像评估猪模型中胃代食管的微循环组织氧合——一项实验研究
Int J Surg. 2024 Oct 1;110(10):6558-6572. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001849.
2
Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy.机器人辅助微创食管切除术与微创食管切除术的比较
Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 15;13:1293645. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1293645. eCollection 2023.
3
Short-term outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in robotic-assisted McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study.机器人辅助McKeown食管癌切除术术后加速康复方案的短期结局:一项单中心回顾性队列研究
Front Oncol. 2023 Dec 12;13:1150945. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1150945. eCollection 2023.
4
The Implementation of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: A Step Toward Better Outcomes?微创手术在食管癌治疗中的应用:迈向更好治疗效果的一步?
Oncol Ther. 2022 Dec;10(2):337-349. doi: 10.1007/s40487-022-00206-3. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
5
Early implementation of a perioperative nutrition support pathway for patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.早期实施围手术期营养支持途径,以支持食管癌患者行食管癌切除术。
Cancer Med. 2022 Feb;11(3):592-601. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4360. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
6
Outcomes of robotic esophagectomy.机器人辅助食管切除术的结果
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Oct;13(10):6163-6168. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2019-rts-07.
7
Minimally Invasive Versus open AbdominoThoracic Esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma (MIVATE) - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial DRKS00016773.微创与开放经胸腹部食管切除术治疗食管癌(MIVATE) - 一项随机对照临床试验的研究方案 DRKS00016773。
Trials. 2021 Jan 11;22(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04966-z.
8
Robotic oesophago-gastric cancer surgery.机器人辅助食管癌和胃癌手术
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 May;100(6_sup):27-35. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.supp1.23.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic esophagectomy.机器人辅助食管切除术
J Vis Surg. 2016 Aug 10;2:139. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2016.07.16. eCollection 2016.
2
Meta-analysis of health-related quality of life after minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.微创与开放食管癌根治术后健康相关生活质量的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2017 Aug;104(9):1131-1140. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10577. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
3
Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center initial experience.机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE):匹兹堡大学医学中心的初步经验。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Mar;6(2):179-185. doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.03.12.
4
Robotic Esophagectomy for Cancer: Early Results and Lessons Learned.机器人辅助食管癌切除术治疗癌症:早期结果与经验教训
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Spring;28(1):160-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
5
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.微创与开放食管癌切除术治疗食管癌:一项基于人群的分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Aug;102(2):416-23. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.02.078. Epub 2016 May 4.
6
Worldwide trends in surgical techniques in the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer.全球食管和胃食管交界癌治疗中手术技术的趋势
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jan 1;30(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12480.
7
Factors influencing difficulty of the thoracic procedure in minimally invasive esophagectomy.影响微创食管切除术胸段手术难度的因素。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4279-85. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4743-3. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
8
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison of Early Surgical Outcomes From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.微创与开放食管癌切除术治疗食管癌:来自胸外科医师协会国家数据库的早期手术结果比较
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Apr;101(4):1281-8; discussion 1288-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.095. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
9
Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes.胸腔镜-腹腔镜联合食管癌切除术与开放食管癌切除术的比较:结局的荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3873-81. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4692-x. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
10
Open three-stage transthoracic oesophagectomy versus minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: protocol for a multicentre prospective, open and parallel, randomised controlled trial.开放性三阶段经胸食管癌切除术与微创胸腹腔镜食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的比较:一项多中心前瞻性、开放平行随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 17;5(11):e008328. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008328.

微创与机器人辅助食管切除术:现状

Minimally invasive and robotic esophagectomy: state of the art.

作者信息

Taurchini Marco, Cuttitta Antonello

机构信息

Unit of Thoracic Surgery, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.

出版信息

J Vis Surg. 2017 Sep 14;3:125. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.08.23. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.21037/jovs.2017.08.23
PMID:29078685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5639027/
Abstract

Esophageal cancer is the eight most common cancer in the world and surgical resection remains the gold standard not only in providing the optimal chance for cure but also the best palliation for dysphagia. Esophagectomy is a complex operation and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality that are reported as 23-50% and 2-8% in western country. At the moment no gold standard techniques exist for esophagectomy. The choice of the technique depends on several factors; location of tumor and surgeon's experience are probably the most relevant. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), performed in high volume centers, has shown to reduce the rate of complications with the same oncological outcome as open esophagectomy. The addition of robotic technique to MIE is relatively new and is gaining widespread acceptance. Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is safe and feasible, and its short-term results are comparable to conventional MIE. Randomized studies are needed to assess if there is any real benefit associated to the use of the robotic approach.

摘要

食管癌是全球第八大常见癌症,手术切除不仅是实现治愈最佳机会的金标准,也是缓解吞咽困难的最佳方法。食管切除术是一项复杂的手术,其并发症发生率和死亡率都很高,在西方国家分别为23%-50%和2%-8%。目前,食管切除术尚无金标准技术。技术的选择取决于几个因素;肿瘤位置和外科医生的经验可能是最相关的因素。在大型中心进行的微创食管切除术(MIE)已显示可降低并发症发生率,且肿瘤学结局与开放食管切除术相同。将机器人技术应用于MIE相对较新,且正在得到广泛认可。机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)安全可行,其短期效果与传统MIE相当。需要进行随机研究来评估使用机器人手术方法是否真的有任何益处。