• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重度创伤性脑损伤患者的死亡率:直接转运与非直接转运的影响

Mortality rates of severe traumatic brain injury patients: impact of direct versus nondirect transfers.

作者信息

Prabhakaran Kartik, Petrone Patrizio, Lombardo Gary, Stoller Christy, Policastro Anthony, Marini Corrado P

机构信息

Division of Trauma Surgery, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency General Surgery, Department of Surgery New York Medical College, Westchester Medical Center University Hospital, Valhalla, New York.

Division of Trauma Surgery, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency General Surgery, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, New York.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2017 Nov;219:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.103. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.103
PMID:29078912
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Direct transport of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) to trauma centers (TCs) that can provide definitive care results in lower mortality rates. This study investigated the impact of direct versus nondirect transfers on the mortality rates of patients with sTBI.

METHODS

Data on patients with TBI admitted between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2013, to our Level I TC were obtained from the trauma registry. Data included patient age, sex, mechanism, and type of injury, comorbidities, Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity scores, prehospital time, time to request and to transfer, time to initiation of multimodality monitoring and goal-directed therapy protocol, dwell time in the emergency department (EDT), and mortality. Data, reported in means ± standard deviation, were analyzed with the Student t-test and chi-square. Statistical significance was accepted at a P value < 0.05.

RESULTS

sTBI direct transfer to TC versus transfer from non-TCs (NTC): Of the 1187 patients with TBI admitted to our TC, 768 (64.7%) were admitted directly from the scene, whereas 419 (35.3%) were admitted after secondary transfer. One hundred seventy-one (22.2%) of the direct transfers had Glasgow Coma Scale < 8 (sTBI) and 92 (21.9%) of the secondary transfers had sTBI. The transfer time: Time from scene to arrival to the EDT was significantly shorter for TC versus NTCs 43 ± 14 versus 77 ± 26 min, respectively (P < 0.05). EDT dwell time before transfer and time from injury to arrival to TC were 4.2 ± 2.1 and 6.2 ± 8.3 h, respectively. Mortality: There was a statistically significant lower mortality for patients with sTBI transferred directly from the scene to TCs as opposed to patients secondarily transferred, 33/171 (19.3%) versus 33/92 (35.8%), respectively (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

To decrease TBI-related mortality, patients with suspected sTBI should be taken directly to a Level I or II TC unless they require life-saving stabilization at NTCs.

摘要

背景

将重度创伤性脑损伤(sTBI)患者直接转运至能够提供确定性治疗的创伤中心(TCs)可降低死亡率。本研究调查了直接转运与非直接转运对sTBI患者死亡率的影响。

方法

从创伤登记处获取2012年1月1日至2013年12月31日期间入住我院一级TC的TBI患者的数据。数据包括患者年龄、性别、受伤机制和类型、合并症、格拉斯哥昏迷量表、损伤严重程度评分、院前时间、请求转运和实际转运时间、启动多模式监测和目标导向治疗方案的时间、在急诊科的停留时间(EDT)以及死亡率。数据以均值±标准差表示,采用学生t检验和卡方检验进行分析。P值<0.05时具有统计学意义。

结果

sTBI患者直接转运至TC与从非TCs(NTCs)转运的情况:在我院TC收治的1187例TBI患者中,768例(64.7%)直接从现场入院,而419例(35.3%)为二次转运后入院。直接转运的患者中有171例(22.2%)格拉斯哥昏迷量表<8分(sTBI),二次转运的患者中有92例(21.9%)为sTBI。转运时间:从现场到到达EDT的时间,TC组显著短于NTCs组,分别为43±14分钟和77±26分钟(P<0.05)。转运前的EDT停留时间以及从受伤到到达TC的时间分别为4.2±2.1小时和6.2±8.3小时。死亡率:与二次转运的患者相比,直接从现场转运至TC的sTBI患者死亡率在统计学上显著更低,分别为33/171(19.3%)和33/92(35.8%)(P<0.05)。

结论

为降低TBI相关死亡率,疑似sTBI患者应直接送往一级或二级TC,除非他们需要在NTCs进行挽救生命的稳定治疗。

相似文献

1
Mortality rates of severe traumatic brain injury patients: impact of direct versus nondirect transfers.重度创伤性脑损伤患者的死亡率:直接转运与非直接转运的影响
J Surg Res. 2017 Nov;219:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.103. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
2
Transfer times to definitive care facilities are too long: a consequence of an immature trauma system.转送至确定性治疗机构的时间过长:这是创伤系统不成熟的结果。
Ann Surg. 2005 Jun;241(6):961-6; discussion 966-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000164178.62726.f1.
3
Patients with severe traumatic brain injury transferred to a Level I or II trauma center: United States, 2007 to 2009.2007 年至 2009 年期间,严重创伤性脑损伤患者转送至一级或二级创伤中心:美国。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1491-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182782675.
4
Emergency access to neurosurgical care for patients with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者的神经外科紧急救治通道。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Jan;218(1):51-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
5
Insurance Status Biases Trauma-system Utilization and Appropriate Interfacility Transfer: National and Longitudinal Results of Adult, Pediatric, and Older Adult Patients.保险状况对创伤系统利用和适当的院内转科存在偏见:成人、儿科和老年患者的全国性和纵向结果。
Ann Surg. 2018 Oct;268(4):681-689. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002954.
6
Direct versus indirect transfer for traumatic brain injury to James Cook University Hospital: a retrospective study.创伤性脑损伤直接转至詹姆斯·库克大学医院与间接转至该院的对比:一项回顾性研究。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021 Jan;103(1):23-28. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0180. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
7
Direct transport versus inter hospital transfer of severely injured trauma patients.重伤创伤患者的直接转运与医院间转运
Injury. 2016 Jan;47(1):26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.020. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
8
A novel methodology to characterize interfacility transfer strategies in a trauma transfer network.一种用于描述创伤转运网络中机构间转运策略的新方法。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Oct;81(4):658-65. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001187.
9
Big children or little adults? A statewide analysis of adolescent isolated severe traumatic brain injury outcomes at pediatric versus adult trauma centers.大孩子还是小大人?一项针对儿科与成人创伤中心青少年孤立性严重创伤性脑损伤结局的全州范围分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Feb;82(2):368-373. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001291.
10
Prehospital on-scene anaesthetist treating severe traumatic brain injury patients is associated with lower mortality and better neurological outcome.现场预诊麻醉师治疗严重创伤性脑损伤患者与较低的死亡率和更好的神经预后相关。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Jan 28;27(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0590-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Inter-facility transfers to an urban level 1 trauma center and rates of secondary overtriage.向城市一级创伤中心的机构间转运及二次过度分诊率。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jan 24;51(1):48. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02741-2.
2
Comparison of an AI-based mobile pupillometry system and NPi-200 for pupillary light reflex and correlation with glaucoma-related markers.基于人工智能的移动瞳孔测量系统与NPi-200用于瞳孔光反射的比较及其与青光眼相关标志物的相关性
Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 9;15:1426205. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1426205. eCollection 2024.
3
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of traumatic brain injury in patients admitted to surgical ward of Jimma Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia: a prospective observational follow-up study.
在埃塞俄比亚西南部的 Jimma 医疗中心外科病房收治的创伤性脑损伤患者的临床特征和结局:一项前瞻性观察随访研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 1;14(2):e080598. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080598.
4
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Recovery to normal vital functions and acid-base status after a severe trauma in Level I versus Level II Trauma Centres.Ⅰ级与Ⅱ级创伤中心严重创伤后恢复正常生命功能和酸碱状态的比较。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Apr;50(2):513-522. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02390-x. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
6
Identifying the Target Traumatic Brain Injury Population for Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy.确定高压氧治疗的目标创伤性脑损伤人群。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Sep 27;24(19):14612. doi: 10.3390/ijms241914612.
7
Traumatic brain injury and immunological outcomes: the double-edged killer.创伤性脑损伤与免疫结果:双面杀手
Future Sci OA. 2023 May 9;9(6):FSO864. doi: 10.2144/fsoa-2023-0037. eCollection 2023 Jul.
8
Mobile Smartphone-Based Digital Pupillometry Curves in the Diagnosis of Traumatic Brain Injury.基于移动智能手机的数字瞳孔测量曲线在创伤性脑损伤诊断中的应用
Front Neurosci. 2022 Jul 1;16:893711. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.893711. eCollection 2022.
9
The relationship between road traffic collision dynamics and traumatic brain injury pathology.道路交通碰撞动力学与创伤性脑损伤病理学之间的关系。
Brain Commun. 2022 Feb 12;4(2):fcac033. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac033. eCollection 2022.
10
Patterns and Impact of Traumatic Brain Injury at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.沙特阿拉伯吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医疗城创伤性脑损伤的模式与影响:一项回顾性队列研究
Cureus. 2021 Dec 7;13(12):e20246. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20246. eCollection 2021 Dec.