• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者,首选的复苏液体是什么?

What is the Preferred Resuscitation Fluid for Patients with Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock?

作者信息

Winters Michael E, Sherwin Robert, Vilke Gary M, Wardi Gabriel

机构信息

University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;53(6):928-939. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.08.093. Epub 2017 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.08.093
PMID:29079487
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines for the management of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock recommend crystalloids as the initial fluid solution of choice in the resuscitation of these patients. In recent years, there have been numerous studies published on the type of fluid used in the resuscitation of patients with sepsis. The primary goal of this article is to determine the preferred intravenous fluid for the resuscitation of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

METHODS

A MEDLINE literature review was completed to identify studies that investigated the type of resuscitation fluid in the management of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Articles included were those published in English between 2011 and 2016, enrolled human subjects, and limited to the following types: randomized controlled trial, prospective observational trial, retrospective cohort trial, and meta-analyses. All selected articles then underwent a structured review by the authors.

RESULTS

Nine thousand sixty-two articles were identified in the search. After use of predetermined criteria, 17 articles were selected for review. Eleven of these were original investigations and six were meta-analyses and systemic reviews.

CONCLUSION

Crystalloids are the preferred solution for the resuscitation of emergency department patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Balanced crystalloids may improve patient-centered outcomes and should be considered as an alternative to normal saline, if available. There is strong evidence that suggests semi-synthetic colloids decrease survival and should be avoided. The role of albumin in the resuscitation of patients with severe sepsis and sepsis is uncertain.

摘要

背景

目前针对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的管理指南推荐使用晶体液作为这些患者复苏时的初始补液选择。近年来,关于脓毒症患者复苏所用液体类型已发表了大量研究。本文的主要目的是确定严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者复苏时的首选静脉补液。

方法

完成了一项MEDLINE文献综述,以识别研究严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者管理中复苏液体类型的研究。纳入的文章为2011年至2016年期间以英文发表、纳入人类受试者且限于以下类型的文章:随机对照试验、前瞻性观察性试验、回顾性队列试验和荟萃分析。然后作者对所有选定的文章进行了结构化审查。

结果

搜索中识别出9062篇文章。使用预定标准后,选择了17篇文章进行审查。其中11篇为原始研究,6篇为荟萃分析和系统评价。

结论

晶体液是急诊科严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者复苏的首选溶液。平衡晶体液可能改善以患者为中心的结局,如有条件,应考虑作为生理盐水的替代选择。有强有力的证据表明半合成胶体降低生存率,应避免使用。白蛋白在严重脓毒症和脓毒症患者复苏中的作用尚不确定。

相似文献

1
What is the Preferred Resuscitation Fluid for Patients with Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock?对于严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者,首选的复苏液体是什么?
J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;53(6):928-939. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.08.093. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
2
Association between Initial Fluid Choice and Subsequent In-hospital Mortality during the Resuscitation of Adults with Septic Shock.在成人脓毒性休克复苏期间,初始液体选择与随后院内死亡率之间的关联。
Anesthesiology. 2015 Dec;123(6):1385-93. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000861.
3
Multicountry survey of emergency and critical care medicine physicians' fluid resuscitation practices for adult patients with early septic shock.针对成年早期脓毒性休克患者,多国急诊与重症医学医师液体复苏实践调查。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 7;6(7):e010041. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010041.
4
Effects of fluid resuscitation with synthetic colloids or crystalloids alone on shock reversal, fluid balance, and patient outcomes in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective sequential analysis.单独使用合成胶体或晶体液复苏对严重脓毒症休克逆转、液体平衡和患者结局的影响:一项前瞻性序贯分析。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Sep;40(9):2543-51. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318258fee7.
5
Intravenous fluids in sepsis: what to use and what to avoid.脓毒症的静脉补液:该用什么,又该避免什么。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2013 Dec;19(6):537-43. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000028.
6
Choice of Fluid Therapy in the Initial Management of Sepsis, Severe Sepsis, and Septic Shock.脓毒症、严重脓毒症及脓毒性休克初始治疗中的液体疗法选择
Shock. 2016 Jul;46(1):17-26. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000577.
7
Fluid resuscitation in sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.脓毒症液体复苏:系统评价和网状 Meta 分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Sep 2;161(5):347-55. doi: 10.7326/M14-0178.
8
Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients.胶体液与晶体液用于危重症患者液体复苏的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28(2):CD000567. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000567.pub6.
9
Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients.胶体液与晶体液用于危重症患者液体复苏的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13(6):CD000567. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000567.pub5.
10
Balanced crystalloids for septic shock resuscitation.用于感染性休克复苏的平衡晶体液
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2016 Oct-Dec;28(4):463-471. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20160079.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical efficacy of various resuscitation fluids in the management of sepsis in postoperative surgical and trauma patients: a systematic review and meta--analysis.不同复苏液在术后外科及创伤患者脓毒症管理中的临床疗效:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024 Sep 20;19(3):275-288. doi: 10.20452/wiitm.2024.17900. eCollection 2024 Oct 16.
2
Clinical implications of septic cardiomyopathy: A narrative review.脓毒症性心肌病的临床意义:一篇叙述性综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Apr 26;103(17):e37940. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037940.
3
Comparison of Balanced Crystalloids versus Normal Saline in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
危重症患者使用平衡晶体液与生理盐水的比较:一项对随机对照试验进行的系统评价、荟萃分析及试验序贯分析
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023 Oct 11;19:783-799. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S416785. eCollection 2023.
4
New Insights into the Fluid Management in Patients with Septic Shock.脓毒性休克患者液体管理的新见解。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 29;59(6):1047. doi: 10.3390/medicina59061047.
5
Ulinastatin as an Adjuvant Therapy to Restricting Volumes of Resuscitation Fluid Strategy for Patients with Septic Shock after Initial Management.乌司他丁作为初始治疗后脓毒性休克患者限制性液体复苏策略的辅助治疗
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021 Jun 16;2021:4231454. doi: 10.1155/2021/4231454. eCollection 2021.
6
The effects of sepsis on endothelium and clinical implications.脓毒症对血管内皮的影响及其临床意义。
Cardiovasc Res. 2021 Jan 1;117(1):60-73. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa070.
7
Effects of chloride content of intravenous crystalloid solutions in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized trials.成人危重症患者静脉输注晶体溶液中氯含量的影响:一项随机试验的Meta分析及试验序贯分析
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Feb 13;9(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0506-y.