• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Is More Always Better? An Assessment of the Impact of Lymph Node Yield on Outcome for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer with Low/Intermediate Risk Pathology (pT2-3a/pN0) Managed with Prostatectomy Alone.越多就越好吗?对仅接受前列腺切除术治疗的低/中危病理(pT2 - 3a/pN0)临床局限性前列腺癌患者,评估淋巴结获取数量对预后的影响。
Pathol Oncol Res. 2019 Jan;25(1):209-215. doi: 10.1007/s12253-017-0349-5. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
2
Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术是治疗标本中存在高病理 Gleason 评分前列腺癌的有效方法。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):723-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11114.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
3
External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.临床分期为T1-2期前列腺癌的体外放射治疗与根治性前列腺切除术:根据治疗前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平和活检Gleason评分分层的治疗意义
Cancer J Sci Am. 1997 Mar-Apr;3(2):78-87.
4
Radical prostatectomy improves progression-free and cancer-specific survival in men with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era: a confirmatory study.根治性前列腺切除术改善了 PSA 时代淋巴结阳性前列腺癌男性的无进展生存期和癌症特异性生存期:一项确认性研究。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1755-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09730.x. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
5
Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy.T1-2期前列腺癌:根治性前列腺切除术后影响生化及临床失败因素的多变量分析
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Mar 15;37(5):1043-52. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00590-1.
6
The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺特异性抗原持续存在对预测淋巴结阳性前列腺癌患者临床进展和癌症特异性死亡率的作用。
Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.010. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
7
The extent of pelvic lymph node dissection correlates with the biochemical recurrence rate in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.盆腔淋巴结清扫术的范围与中高危前列腺癌患者的生化复发率相关。
BJU Int. 2011 Oct;108(8):1262-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10016.x. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
8
Small-volume lymph node involvement and biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术加扩大淋巴结清扫术后小体积淋巴结受累和生化复发的前列腺癌。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul;25(7):1398-1404. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01682-1. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
9
Pathological and oncologic outcomes for men with positive lymph nodes at radical prostatectomy: The Johns Hopkins Hospital 30-year experience.根治性前列腺切除术后淋巴结阳性的男性的病理和肿瘤学结果:约翰霍普金斯医院 30 年经验。
Prostate. 2013 Nov;73(15):1673-80. doi: 10.1002/pros.22702. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
10
Lymph node yield during radical prostatectomy does not impact rate of biochemical recurrence in patients with seminal vesicle invasion and node-negative disease.在患有精囊侵犯且淋巴结阴性疾病的患者中,根治性前列腺切除术中的淋巴结获取数量并不影响生化复发率。
Urol Oncol. 2018 Jun;36(6):310.e1-310.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the safety and efficacy of single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted techniques in urological surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较单孔与多孔机器人辅助技术在泌尿外科手术中的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2024 Jan 10;42(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04711-6.
2
The survival benefit of different lymph node yields in radical prostatectomy for pN1M0 prostate cancer patients: Implications from a population-based study.根治性前列腺切除术治疗pN1M0前列腺癌患者时不同淋巴结清扫数量的生存获益:一项基于人群研究的启示
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 11;12:953069. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.953069. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection to Select Clinically Node-negative Prostate Cancer Patients for Pelvic Radiation Therapy: Effect on Biochemical Recurrence and Systemic Progression.前哨淋巴结清扫术选择临床淋巴结阴性前列腺癌患者行盆腔放疗:对生化复发和全身进展的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Feb 1;97(2):347-354. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.10.016. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
2
Diagnostic Efficacy of (68)Gallium-PSMA Positron Emission Tomography Compared to Conventional Imaging for Lymph Node Staging of 130 Consecutive Patients with Intermediate to High Risk Prostate Cancer.(68)镓-PSMA 正电子发射断层扫描对 130 例中高危前列腺癌患者淋巴结分期的诊断效能与常规影像学比较。
J Urol. 2016 May;195(5):1436-1443. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.025. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
3
The impact of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on the use and extent of pelvic lymph node dissection in the "post-dissemination" period.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术对“播散后”时期盆腔淋巴结清扫术的应用及范围的影响
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;40(9):1080-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.12.016. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
4
Does increasing the nodal yield improve outcomes in contemporary patients without nodal metastasis undergoing radical prostatectomy?提高淋巴结切除率是否能改善当代无淋巴结转移的前列腺癌根治术患者的预后?
Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan;32(1):47.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
5
Extended pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: a 20-year audit in a single center.前列腺癌的盆腔淋巴结扩大清扫术:单中心 20 年回顾。
Ann Oncol. 2013 Jun;24(6):1459-66. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt120. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
6
Trends in prostate cancer in the United States.美国前列腺癌的趋势。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012 Dec;2012(45):152-6. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs035.
7
Mapping of pelvic lymph node metastases in prostate cancer.前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结转移的定位。
Eur Urol. 2013 Mar;63(3):450-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.057. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
8
Lymph node count threshold for optimal pelvic lymph node staging in prostate cancer.前列腺癌中用于最佳盆腔淋巴结分期的淋巴结计数阈值。
Int J Urol. 2012 Jul;19(7):645-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.02993.x. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
9
The extent of pelvic lymph node dissection correlates with the biochemical recurrence rate in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.盆腔淋巴结清扫术的范围与中高危前列腺癌患者的生化复发率相关。
BJU Int. 2011 Oct;108(8):1262-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10016.x. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
10
Radical prostatectomy for cT3-4 disease: an evaluation of the pathological outcomes and patterns of care for adjuvant radiation in a national cohort.cT3-4 期疾病的根治性前列腺切除术:全国队列中辅助放疗的病理结果和治疗模式评估。
BJU Int. 2011 Aug;108(3):360-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09875.x. Epub 2010 Nov 18.

越多就越好吗?对仅接受前列腺切除术治疗的低/中危病理(pT2 - 3a/pN0)临床局限性前列腺癌患者,评估淋巴结获取数量对预后的影响。

Is More Always Better? An Assessment of the Impact of Lymph Node Yield on Outcome for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer with Low/Intermediate Risk Pathology (pT2-3a/pN0) Managed with Prostatectomy Alone.

作者信息

Seyedin Steven N, Mitchell Darrion L, Mott Sarah L, Russo J Kyle, Tracy Chad R, Snow Anthony N, Parkhurst Jessica R, Smith Mark C, Buatti John M, Watkins John M

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Carver School of Medicine, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.

Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

Pathol Oncol Res. 2019 Jan;25(1):209-215. doi: 10.1007/s12253-017-0349-5. Epub 2017 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1007/s12253-017-0349-5
PMID:29079967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5924586/
Abstract

The clinical impact of lymph node dissection extent remains undetermined in the contemporary setting, as reflected in care pattern variations. Despite some series demonstrating a direct relationship between number of lymph nodes identified and detection of nodal involvement, the correlation between lymph node yield and disease control or survival outcomes remains unclear. Patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, pre-RP PSA <30, and pT2-3a/N0 disease at RP were retrospectively identified from two databases for inclusion. Those who received pre- or post-RP radiotherapy or hormone therapy were excluded. Kaplan-Meier method was employed for survival probability estimation. Cox regression models were used to assess bRFS differences between subsets. From 2002 to 2010, 667 eligible patients were identified. The median age was 61 yrs. (range, 43-76), with median PSA 5.6 ng/dL (0.9-28.0). At RP, most patients had pT2c (64%) disease with Gleason Score (GS) ≤6 (43%) or 7 (48%); 218 (33%) patients had positive margins (M+). At median clinical and PSA follow-up of 96 and 87 months, respectively, 146 patients (22%) experienced PSA failure with an estimated bRFS of 81%/76% at 5/8 years. For patients who underwent LND, univariable analysis identified PSA (at diagnosis), higher GS (≥7, at biopsy or RP), intermediate/high risk stratification, M+ as adversely associated with bRFS (all p < 0.01). A higher number of LNs excised was not associated with improved bRFS for the entire cohort (HR = 0.97, p = 0.27), nor for any clinical risk stratum, biopsy GS, or RP GS subgroup. This study did not demonstrate an association between LN yield and bRFS in patients with clinically localized pT2-3a/pN0 prostate cancer managed with RP alone, either in the entire population or with substratification by clinical risk stratum or GS.

摘要

淋巴结清扫范围的临床影响在当代环境中仍未确定,这在护理模式的差异中有所体现。尽管一些系列研究表明所识别的淋巴结数量与淋巴结受累的检测之间存在直接关系,但淋巴结切除数量与疾病控制或生存结果之间的相关性仍不明确。从两个数据库中回顾性识别出临床局限性前列腺癌、RP前PSA<30且RP时为pT2 - 3a/N0疾病的患者纳入研究。排除接受RP前或RP后放疗或激素治疗的患者。采用Kaplan - Meier方法估计生存概率。使用Cox回归模型评估各亚组之间的bRFS差异。2002年至2010年,共识别出667例符合条件的患者。中位年龄为61岁(范围43 - 76岁),中位PSA为5.6 ng/dL(0.9 - 28.0)。在RP时,大多数患者患有pT2c(64%)疾病,Gleason评分(GS)≤6(43%)或7(48%);218例(33%)患者切缘阳性(M+)。在中位临床随访96个月和PSA随访87个月时,146例患者(22%)出现PSA失败,5/8年时估计的bRFS为81%/76%。对于接受LND的患者,单因素分析确定诊断时的PSA、更高的GS(活检或RP时≥7)、中/高风险分层、M+与bRFS呈负相关(所有p<0.01)。切除的淋巴结数量较多与整个队列的bRFS改善无关(HR = 0.97,p = 0.27),在任何临床风险分层、活检GS或RP GS亚组中均无关联。本研究未证明在仅接受RP治疗的临床局限性pT2 - 3a/pN0前列腺癌患者中,淋巴结切除数量与bRFS之间存在关联,无论是在整个人群中还是按临床风险分层或GS进行亚组分析时。