Salois Jane R, Slovarp Laurie J, Spinti Isabel, Graham Jon, Thorne Jethro, Glaspey Amy, Off Catherine, Jetté Marie
School of Speech, Language, Hearing, & Occupational Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT 59812, USA.
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT 59812, USA.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 12;14(12):4199. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124199.
Cough reflex sensitivity during cough challenge testing has been found to be modifiable with distraction in groups of healthy individuals. The purpose of this study was to examine this phenomenon in healthy controls and patients with refractory chronic cough (RCC) to advance our understanding of the role attention plays in cough modulation and shed light on avenues for therapeutic advances for RCC. : Thirteen adults with RCC (mean age = 60, 12 women) and twelve healthy controls (mean age = 60, 11 women) participated in this study. The participants completed cough challenge testing with nebulized capsaicin doses tailored to their individual cough reflex sensitivity under distraction and no-distraction conditions. The distraction condition consisted of cough challenge testing while completing a cognitive (visual memory) task on a tablet. Capsaicin doses included the dose that elicited two coughs (C2), and up to three doubling doses above C2. Capsaicin doses were administered in serial order with a placebo dose randomized into the order to control for an anticipation effect during each condition. For each dose administered, the participants were instructed to cough if they needed to. Cough frequency within 15 s and maximal urge-to-cough with each dose were recorded. The order of conditions (distraction or no distraction) was alternated, and all testing was completed within one session. : There were no meaningful differences in the dose-response rate parameters for cough frequency or urge-to-cough, respectively, when comparing the results from the RCC group in the condition without distraction to the condition with distraction ( = 0.647, 95% CI = -2.25, 1.15; = 0.783, 95% CI = -1.94, 0.84), and to the healthy control group without distraction ( = 0.921, 95% CI = -2.11, 2.73, = 0.887, 95% CI = -1.40, 0.80), and with distraction ( = 0.970, 95% CI = -2.16, 3.36), = 0.808, 95% CI = -1.49, 0.89). : Distraction with the cognitive task chosen in this study did not influence cough reflex sensitivity in either group, which is contrary to studies on healthy volunteers and anecdotal evidence reported by RCC patients. Attentional resources may not have been sufficiently taxed, or too few capsaicin doses were administered to capture an effect as there was high individual variability in cough frequency and urge-to-cough. Additional research is needed to tailor the difficulty of the cognitive task to each participant and incorporate a real-world distraction scenario that may better reveal how attentional manipulation could be harnessed to optimize the effectiveness of behavioral cough suppression therapy for patients with refractory chronic cough.
在咳嗽激发试验中,健康人群的咳嗽反射敏感性可通过分心而改变。本研究旨在对健康对照者和难治性慢性咳嗽(RCC)患者进行此项研究,以加深我们对注意力在咳嗽调节中作用的理解,并为RCC的治疗进展提供思路。13名RCC成年患者(平均年龄 = 60岁,12名女性)和12名健康对照者(平均年龄 = 60岁,11名女性)参与了本研究。参与者在分心和无分心条件下,接受根据其个体咳嗽反射敏感性定制的雾化辣椒素剂量的咳嗽激发试验。分心条件包括在平板电脑上完成认知(视觉记忆)任务时进行咳嗽激发试验。辣椒素剂量包括引发两次咳嗽的剂量(C2),以及高于C2的多达三个加倍剂量。辣椒素剂量按顺序给药,将一剂安慰剂随机混入给药顺序中,以控制每种条件下的预期效应。对于每剂给药,指示参与者如有需要则咳嗽。记录15秒内的咳嗽频率以及每次剂量时的最大咳嗽冲动。条件(分心或无分心)的顺序交替进行,所有测试在一个疗程内完成。在比较RCC组在无分心条件下与分心条件下的结果时,咳嗽频率或咳嗽冲动的剂量反应率参数分别无显著差异(P = 0.647,95% CI = -2.25,1.15;P = 0.783,95% CI = -1.94,0.84),与无分心的健康对照组相比(P = 0.921,95% CI = -2.11,2.73;P = 0.887,95% CI = -1.40,0.80),以及与分心的健康对照组相比(P = 0.970,95% CI = -2.16,3.36;P = 0.808,95% CI = -1.49,0.89)。本研究中选择的认知任务分心并未影响两组的咳嗽反射敏感性,这与关于健康志愿者的研究以及RCC患者报告的轶事证据相反。注意力资源可能未得到充分利用,或者给药的辣椒素剂量过少,无法捕捉到效应,因为咳嗽频率和咳嗽冲动存在较高的个体差异。需要进一步研究,根据每个参与者调整认知任务的难度,并纳入一个可能更好地揭示如何利用注意力操纵来优化难治性慢性咳嗽患者行为性咳嗽抑制疗法有效性的现实世界分心场景。