• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃肠病学奖学金申请:竞赛与策略。

Landing a GI Fellowship: The Match and the Map.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, MetroWest Medical Center, Framingham, MA, 01702, USA.

Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Mar;63(3):605-609. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4826-1. Epub 2017 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-017-4826-1
PMID:29080995
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Based on the location of training programs, internal applicants and local applicants were defined as applicants who attended the same training institution and trained in local areas (i.e., state, division, and region), respectively. While being an internal applicant does influence fellowship matching success for some specialties, gastroenterology fellowship program directors do not rank this consideration in the top half of their priority list. There is no published evidence about the frequency that internal applicants and local applicants match in US gastroenterology training program.

AIM

To find the proportion of gastroenterologists who were internal applicants and local applicants during the graduation years 2010-2019.

METHODS

Online search in Doximity was conducted to obtain postgraduate training information of gastroenterologists with the graduation years 2010-2019. Programs were classified into nine divisions and four regions per United States Census Bureau. We used confidence level 95% and margin of error 2% to calculate sample size.

RESULTS

In total, 1489 physicians (N = 1489) were included. The proportion of internal applicants was 39.56% of the sample size. The proportions of gastroenterologists who attended IM residency programs in the same state, same division, and same region were 53.06, 60.64, and 71.93%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A large proportion of gastroenterologists were either internal applicants or local applicants. Further research is necessary to better understand the reasons behind these trends and whether the bias against external or geographically distant fellowship candidates is intended or unintended, as these data have broad implications for GI fellowship candidate residency program and geography choices.

摘要

背景

根据培训项目的地点,内部申请者和本地申请者分别被定义为参加同一培训机构并在当地(即州、分部和地区)培训的申请者。虽然内部申请者确实会影响某些专业的奖学金匹配成功率,但胃肠病学奖学金项目主任并没有将这一考虑因素列入他们的优先事项清单的前半部分。目前尚无关于美国胃肠病学培训项目中内部申请者和本地申请者匹配频率的发表证据。

目的

确定 2010-2019 年毕业的胃肠病学家中内部申请者和本地申请者的比例。

方法

在 Doximity 上进行在线搜索,以获取 2010-2019 年毕业的胃肠病学家的研究生培训信息。根据美国人口普查局的规定,将项目分为九个分部和四个地区。我们使用置信水平为 95%,误差幅度为 2%来计算样本量。

结果

共有 1489 名医生(N=1489)被纳入研究。内部申请者的比例占样本量的 39.56%。在同一州、同一分部和同一地区参加内科住院医师培训项目的胃肠病学家的比例分别为 53.06%、60.64%和 71.93%。

结论

很大一部分胃肠病学家是内部申请者或本地申请者。需要进一步研究,以更好地了解这些趋势背后的原因,以及对外科或地理位置较远的奖学金候选人的偏见是有意还是无意的,因为这些数据对 GI 奖学金候选住院医师项目和地理选择具有广泛的影响。

相似文献

1
Landing a GI Fellowship: The Match and the Map.胃肠病学奖学金申请:竞赛与策略。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Mar;63(3):605-609. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4826-1. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
2
Bringing order to the chaos: developing a matching process for minimally invasive and gastrointestinal postgraduate fellowships.为混乱带来秩序:制定微创与胃肠病学研究生奖学金的匹配流程。
Ann Surg. 2006 Apr;243(4):431-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000205217.45477.25.
3
Internal Applicants to Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowships and Current Use of the National Resident Matching Program Match: A Survey of Fellowship Directors.儿科急诊医学奖学金的内部申请人与全国住院医师匹配计划的当前使用情况:奖学金主任调查
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 Jul;31(7):487-92. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000481.
4
The Gastroenterology Fellowship Match: A Decade Later.胃肠病学专科医师培训项目匹配:十年之后
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Jun;62(6):1412-1416. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4593-z. Epub 2017 May 4.
5
Gastroenterology Fellowship Applicants' Perspectives on GI Program Preferences.胃肠病学 fellowship 申请者对胃肠病学项目偏好的看法。
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Apr;66(4):941-944. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-06855-0. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
6
Women in Orthopaedic Fellowships: What Is Their Match Rate, and What Specialties Do They Choose?参加骨科专科培训的女性:她们的匹配率是多少,以及她们选择了哪些专业?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Sep;474(9):1957-61. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4829-9.
7
Association of Mentor-to-Program Contact and Applicant Rank Disclosure With Vitreoretinal Fellowship Applicant's Final Match Outcome in 2016 and 2017.2016 年和 2017 年导师与项目联系和申请人排名披露与玻璃体视网膜研究员申请人最终匹配结果的关联。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun 1;136(6):642-647. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.1107.
8
Training directors have positive perceptions of a competency-based gastroenterology and transplant hepatology fellowship program.培训主任对基于能力的胃肠病学和移植肝脏病学研究员课程计划持积极看法。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Feb;13(2):398-401.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.07.053. Epub 2014 Aug 9.
9
Applicant Characteristics Associated with Glaucoma Fellowship Match from 2010 to 2017.2010 年至 2017 年青光眼研究员匹配相关申请人特征。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022 Mar-Apr;5(2):233-240. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
10
Residency Program Reputation Influences the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Match Results.住院医师项目声誉影响美国髋膝关节外科协会匹配结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Sep;35(9):2676-2681. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.080. Epub 2020 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Gastroenterology Fellowship Applicants' Perspectives on GI Program Preferences.胃肠病学 fellowship 申请者对胃肠病学项目偏好的看法。
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Apr;66(4):941-944. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-06855-0. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
2
Gastroenterology Fellowship Match: An Inside Look.胃肠病学专科医师培训项目匹配:深入剖析
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Mar;63(3):545-546. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-4907-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between proportion of US medical graduates and program characteristics in gastroenterology fellowships.美国医学毕业生比例与胃肠病学 fellowship 项目特征之间的关联。
Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1364604. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1364604.
2
The Gastroenterology Fellowship Match: A Decade Later.胃肠病学专科医师培训项目匹配:十年之后
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Jun;62(6):1412-1416. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4593-z. Epub 2017 May 4.
3
The gynecologic oncology fellowship interview process: Challenges and potential areas for improvement.
妇科肿瘤学专科 fellowship 面试流程:挑战与潜在的改进领域。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2017 Apr 7;20:115-120. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2017.04.003. eCollection 2017 May.
4
Characterization of dermatopathology fellowship applicants: a 5-year single institution experience.皮肤病理学 fellowship 申请者的特征:一项为期 5 年的单机构经验。
J Cutan Pathol. 2016 May;43(5):411-7. doi: 10.1111/cup.12676. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
5
Relationship of residency program characteristics with pass rate of the American Board of Internal Medicine certifying exam.住院医师培训项目特征与美国内科医学委员会认证考试通过率的关系。
Med Educ Online. 2015 Sep 29;20:28631. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.28631. eCollection 2015.
6
Internal Applicants to Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowships and Current Use of the National Resident Matching Program Match: A Survey of Fellowship Directors.儿科急诊医学奖学金的内部申请人与全国住院医师匹配计划的当前使用情况:奖学金主任调查
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 Jul;31(7):487-92. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000481.
7
Breast imaging fellowships in the United States: who, what, and where?美国的乳腺影像 fellowship 培训项目:培训对象、培训内容及培训地点?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Feb;192(2):403-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1571.
8
The gastroenterology fellowship Match: how it failed and why it could succeed once again.胃肠病学专科医师培训项目的匹配:它是如何失败的以及为何有望再次成功。
Gastroenterology. 2004 Aug;127(2):658-66. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.05.034.
9
The In-Training Examination in Internal Medicine: an analysis of resident performance over time.内科住院医师培训考试:住院医师不同时期表现的分析
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Sep 17;137(6):505-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-6-200209170-00011.