• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为混乱带来秩序:制定微创与胃肠病学研究生奖学金的匹配流程。

Bringing order to the chaos: developing a matching process for minimally invasive and gastrointestinal postgraduate fellowships.

作者信息

Swanstrom Lee L, Park Adrian, Arregui Marty, Franklin Morris, Smith C Daniel, Blaney Christina

机构信息

Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Legacy Health System, Portland, OR 97210, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2006 Apr;243(4):431-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000205217.45477.25.

DOI:10.1097/01.sla.0000205217.45477.25
PMID:16552191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1448963/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 1993, there has been an increase in the number of postgraduate fellowships in minimally invasive and gastrointestinal (GI) surgery; from 9 in 1993 to more than 80 in 2004. Early on, there was no supervision or accreditation of these fellowships, and they varied widely in content, structure, and quality. This was widely recognized as being a bad situation for fellow applicants and reflected poorly on the specialties of minimally invasive (MI) and GI surgery. In an effort to bring order to this chaotic situation, the Minimally Invasive Surgery Fellowship Council (MISFC) was founded in 1997.

METHOD

In 2003, the MISFC was incorporated with 77 founding member programs. The goal of the MISFC was to develop guidelines for high-quality fellowship training, to provide a forum for the directors of MI and GI fellowships to exchange ideas, formulate training curricula; to establish uniform application and selection dates; and to create an equitable computerized match system for applicants.

RESULTS

In 2004, the MISFC has increased to 95 members representing 154 postgraduate fellowship positions. The majority of these positions are primarily laparoscopic in focus, but other aspects of GI surgery including bariatric, general GI, flexible endoscopy, and hepatopancreatobiliary are also represented. Uniform application and selection dates were agreed on in 2001; and in 2003, the Council established a computerized Match, administered by the National Resident Match Program, which was used for the 2004 fellowship selection. A total of 113 positions were open for the match. A total of 248 applicants formally applied to MISFC programs and 130 participated in the match. Ninety-nine positions matched on the December 10th match day, and the remaining 14 programs successfully filled on the following scramble day. Seventeen applicants did not match to a program. Post match polling of program directors and applicants documented a high degree of compliance, usability, and satisfaction with the process.

CONCLUSION

The MISFC has been successful at realizing its goals of bringing order to the past chaos of the MIS and GI fellowship situation. Its current iteration, the Fellowship Council, is in the process of introducing an accreditation process to further ensure the highest quality of postgraduate training in the fields of GI and endoscopic surgery.

摘要

背景

自1993年以来,微创和胃肠(GI)外科的研究生奖学金数量有所增加;从1993年的9个增加到2004年的80多个。早期,这些奖学金没有监督或认证,其内容、结构和质量差异很大。这被广泛认为对奖学金申请者来说是糟糕的情况,也给微创(MI)和胃肠外科专业带来了不良影响。为了使这种混乱局面变得有序,微创外科奖学金委员会(MISFC)于1997年成立。

方法

2003年,MISFC合并了77个创始成员项目。MISFC的目标是制定高质量奖学金培训的指导方针,为MI和GI奖学金项目主任提供一个交流想法、制定培训课程的论坛;确定统一的申请和选拔日期;并为申请者创建一个公平的计算机化匹配系统。

结果

2004年,MISFC已增加到95个成员,代表154个研究生奖学金职位。这些职位大多主要侧重于腹腔镜手术,但胃肠外科的其他方面,包括减肥手术、普通胃肠手术、软性内镜检查和肝胰胆手术也有涉及。2001年确定了统一的申请和选拔日期;2003年,该委员会建立了一个由全国住院医师匹配计划管理的计算机化匹配系统,用于2004年的奖学金选拔。共有113个职位可供匹配。共有248名申请者正式申请了MISFC项目,130人参加了匹配。99个职位在12月10日的匹配日成功匹配,其余14个项目在随后的补录日成功填补。17名申请者未匹配到项目。对项目主任和申请者的匹配后调查表明,他们对该过程高度遵守、使用方便且满意。

结论

MISFC成功实现了其目标,即让过去混乱的MIS和GI奖学金局面变得有序。其当前的版本,即奖学金委员会,正在引入认证程序,以进一步确保胃肠和内镜外科领域研究生培训的最高质量。

相似文献

1
Bringing order to the chaos: developing a matching process for minimally invasive and gastrointestinal postgraduate fellowships.为混乱带来秩序:制定微创与胃肠病学研究生奖学金的匹配流程。
Ann Surg. 2006 Apr;243(4):431-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000205217.45477.25.
2
Minimally invasive surgery: the evolution of fellowship.微创手术: fellowship 的演变。 (注:“fellowship”在医学领域有多种含义,比如“ fellowship training ”可译为“专科培训项目” ,这里具体含义需结合上下文确定,仅按要求翻译字面)
Surgery. 2007 Oct;142(4):505-11; discussion 511-3. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.07.009.
3
The radiology class of 2005: the fellowship application process and perceptions of the NRMP fellowship match.2005年放射科班级:专科医师培训申请流程及对美国国家住院医师匹配项目专科医师培训匹配的看法
J Am Coll Radiol. 2005 Nov;2(11):939-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.03.012.
4
National radiology fellowship match program: success or failure?全国放射科住院医师匹配项目:成功还是失败?
J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Mar;1(3):188-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2003.12.001.
5
Can U.S. GI fellowship programs meet American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommendations for training in EUS? A survey of U.S. GI fellowship program directors.美国胃肠病学 fellowship 项目能否满足美国胃肠内镜学会关于超声内镜培训的建议?对美国胃肠病学 fellowship 项目主任的一项调查。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Aug;64(2):235-241. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.04.041.
6
Nephrology training programs and applicants: a very good match.肾脏病学培训项目与申请者:绝配。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Jan;4(1):242-7. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04280808. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
7
Neuroradiology fellowship match: year 4 applicants' perceptions.神经放射学专科住院医师匹配:四年级申请者的看法
J Am Coll Radiol. 2005 Aug;2(8):696-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.12.001.
8
Do increased training requirements in gastrointestinal endoscopy and advanced laparoscopy necessitate a paradigm shift? A survey of program directors in surgery.胃肠道内镜检查和高级腹腔镜检查中不断增加的培训要求是否需要范式转变?一项针对外科项目主任的调查。
J Surg Educ. 2008 Nov-Dec;65(6):418-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2008.05.001.
9
Minimally invasive surgery.微创外科。
Am J Surg. 2010 Feb;199(2):263-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.05.008.
10
A young surgeon's perspective on alternate surgical training pathways.一位年轻外科医生对替代外科培训途径的看法。
Am Surg. 2007 Feb;73(2):114-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Challenges for International Medical Graduates Pursuing Minimally Invasive Surgery Training in the United States and Canada: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.探索国际医学毕业生在美国和加拿大接受微创手术培训所面临的挑战:一项横断面分析。
JSLS. 2022 Jan-Mar;26(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00084.
2
Ten Year Trends in Minimally Invasive Surgery Fellowship.微创外科住院医师培训十年趋势。
JSLS. 2021 Apr-Jun;25(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00080.
3
Teaching surgery novices and trainees advanced laparoscopic suturing: a trial and tribulations.教授手术新手和实习生高级腹腔镜缝合技术:困难与挑战。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Oct;35(10):5816-5826. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08067-5. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
4
Providing complex GI surgical care with minimally invasive approaches: a survey of the practice patterns of Fellowship Council alumni.采用微创方法提供复杂的胃肠道外科护理: fellowship council 校友实践模式调查。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Apr;34(4):1776-1784. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06929-1. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
5
SAGES Advanced GI/MIS fellowship redesign: pilot results and adoption of new standards.SAGES 高级胃肠/微创外科奖学金重新设计:试点结果和新标准的采用。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):3056-3061. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06899-4. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
6
Mentorship Programs in Bariatric Surgery Reduce Perioperative Complication Rate at Equal Short-Term Outcome-Results from the OPTIMIZE Trial.减重手术中的导师制可降低围手术期并发症发生率,并达到同等短期结局——来自 OPTIMIZE 试验的结果。
Obes Surg. 2019 Jan;29(1):127-136. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3495-2.
7
Perception versus reality: elucidating motivation and expectations of current fellowship council minimally invasive surgery fellows.认知与现实:阐明当前 fellowship 理事会微创外科研究员的动机和期望。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4422-4427. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6184-2. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
8
SAGES's advanced GI/MIS fellowship curriculum pilot project.SAGES 高级胃肠/微创外科奖学金课程试点项目。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2613-2619. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6020-8. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
9
Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Minimally Invasive Surgery Training Improves Outcomes in Basic Laparoscopic Procedures.腹腔镜阑尾切除术:微创外科培训可改善基本腹腔镜手术的结果。
World J Surg. 2018 Jun;42(6):1706-1713. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4374-z.
10
Minimally invasive surgery in gastrointestinal cancer: benefits, challenges, and solutions for underutilization.胃肠道癌的微创手术:益处、挑战及未充分利用的解决办法
JSLS. 2014 Oct-Dec;18(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00134.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical education in the United States: portents for change.美国的外科手术教育:变革的预兆。
Ann Surg. 2004 Oct;240(4):565-72. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000140268.04295.f4.
2
The laparoscopic experience of surgical graduates in the United States.美国外科毕业生的腹腔镜手术经验。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Nov;17(11):1792-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8922-7. Epub 2003 Sep 10.
3
Ongoing deficits in resident training for minimally invasive surgery.住院医师微创手术培训方面持续存在的不足。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2002 May-Jun;6(3):501-7; discussion 507-9. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(02)00021-5.
4
The need for training opportunities in advanced laparoscopic surgery.对高级腹腔镜手术培训机会的需求。
Surg Endosc. 2001 Oct;15(10):1066-70. doi: 10.1007/s004640080021.