Idell Steven, Florova Galina, Shetty Sreerama, Tucker Torry, Idell Richard, Koenig Kathy, Azghani Ali, Rahman Najib M, Komissarov Andrey
Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology and Texas Lung Injury institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center.
Department of Behavioral Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center.
Clin Pulm Med. 2017 Jul;24(4):163-169. doi: 10.1097/CPM.0000000000000216.
Complicated pleural effusions and empyema with loculation and failed drainage are common clinical problems. In adults, intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy is commonly used with variable results and therapy remains empiric. Despite the intrapleural use of various plasminogen activators; fibrinolysins, for about sixty years, there is no clear consensus about which agent is most effective. Emerging evidence demonstrates that intrapleural administration of plasminogen activators is subject to rapid inhibition by plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and that processing of fibrinolysins is importantly influenced by other factors including the levels and quality of pleural fluid DNA. Current therapy for loculation that accompanies pleural infections also includes surgery, which is invasive and for which patient selection can be problematic. Most of the clinical literature published to date has used flat dosing of intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy in all subjects but little is known about how that strategy influences the processing of the administered fibrinolysin or how this influences outcomes. We developed a new test of pleural fluids , which is called the Fibrinolytic Potential or FP, in which a dose of a fibrinolysin is added to pleural fluids after which the fibrinolytic activity is measured and normalized to baseline levels. Testing in preclinical and clinical empyema fluids reveals a wide range of responses, indicating that individual patients will likely respond differently to flat dosing of fibrinolysins. The test remains under development but is envisioned as a guide for dosing of these agents, representing a novel candidate approach to personalization of intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy.
伴有分隔且引流失败的复杂性胸腔积液和脓胸是常见的临床问题。在成人中,胸膜腔内纤维蛋白溶解疗法常用但效果不一,治疗仍属经验性。尽管胸膜腔内使用各种纤溶酶原激活剂(纤维蛋白溶解素)已有约60年,但对于哪种药物最有效尚无明确共识。新出现的证据表明,胸膜腔内给予纤溶酶原激活剂会受到纤溶酶原激活剂抑制剂-1的快速抑制,并且纤维蛋白溶解素的加工受到其他因素的重要影响,包括胸腔积液DNA的水平和质量。目前针对胸膜感染伴发分隔的治疗方法还包括手术,手术具有侵入性,且患者选择可能存在问题。迄今为止发表的大多数临床文献在所有受试者中都采用了固定剂量的胸膜腔内纤维蛋白溶解疗法,但对于该策略如何影响所给予纤维蛋白溶解素的加工过程以及这如何影响治疗结果知之甚少。我们开发了一种新的胸腔积液检测方法,称为纤维蛋白溶解潜能(FP),即在胸腔积液中加入一定剂量的纤维蛋白溶解素,然后测量纤维蛋白溶解活性并将其标准化至基线水平。在临床前和临床脓胸积液中的检测显示出广泛的反应,表明个体患者对固定剂量的纤维蛋白溶解素可能有不同反应。该检测方法仍在开发中,但设想作为这些药物给药的指导,代表了胸膜腔内纤维蛋白溶解疗法个性化的一种新的候选方法。