• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估分诊急诊科护理方案在疼痛管理中的有效性和效率。

Evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of the triage emergency department nursing protocol for the management of pain.

作者信息

Butti Loris, Bierti Olga, Lanfrit Raffaela, Bertolini Romina, Chittaro Sara, Delli Compagni Stefania, Del Russo Davide, Mancusi Rossella Letizia, Pertoldi Franco

机构信息

S.O.C. Emergency Medicine, AAS3 Ospedale Sant'Antonio di San Daniele del Friuli.

C.R.E.A. Sanità, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2017 Oct 16;10:2479-2488. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S138850. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.2147/JPR.S138850
PMID:29081670
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5652903/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Pain is a common symptom presented in the emergency department (ED) although it is often underestimated, poorly evaluated and treated. The application of a protocol for timely pain management ensured by the nurse can avoid the delays in the analgesic treatment and improve the patient's quality of waiting.

AIMS

To check the effectiveness and efficiency of the protocol aimed at early pain management in triage, active in our ED. In particular, the response to analgesic treatment was evaluated 60 minutes after the administration and at discharge. Patient satisfaction was also evaluated using two anonymous questionnaires both at discharge and 48 hours later via telephone.

METHODS

A single-center, observational study was conducted on a prospective cohort of patients (aged ≥4 years) with a pain symptom at admission in ED with no surgical picture.

RESULTS

In the observation period (June 2015-May 2016), 382 patients were enrolled, and of these, 312 (84.8%) accepted pain therapy during triage stage in the ED. In 97.4% of the cases, orosoluble paracetamol 1000 mg was administered. In the re-evaluation done 60 minutes later, 65.9% of the patients showed a reduction of at least 2 points on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), equal to a mean reduction of 2.24 points (95% CI: 2.03-2.45). The mean time of analgesia intake was equal to 5.9 minutes (95% CI: 3.8-8.1). In the re-evaluation done at discharge, 33.2% of the patients showed a reduction of NRS score >50%, leading to a mean reduction of 39% (95% CI: 35.3%-41.9%). The level of patient satisfaction was high with a mean value >9 points (maximum satisfaction =10).

CONCLUSION

This protocol shows that optimal pain management was achieved by patients rapidly receiving an effective painkiller therapy at triage, leading to substantial patient satisfaction. In moderate pain, orosoluble paracetamol 1000 mg provided a reduction of NRS score by 2 points in 67.6% of the patients, confirming to be the analgesic of choice in ED.

摘要

引言

疼痛是急诊科常见的症状,但其常常被低估、评估不足且治疗不当。由护士确保实施及时疼痛管理方案可避免镇痛治疗延误,提高患者等待质量。

目的

检验我们急诊科实施的旨在早期疼痛管理的分诊方案的有效性和效率。特别是,在给药60分钟后及出院时评估镇痛治疗的反应。还通过两份匿名问卷在出院时及48小时后通过电话评估患者满意度。

方法

对急诊科入院时伴有疼痛症状且无外科情况的≥4岁患者前瞻性队列进行单中心观察性研究。

结果

在观察期(2015年6月 - 2016年5月),纳入382例患者,其中312例(84.8%)在急诊科分诊阶段接受了疼痛治疗。97.4%的病例给予了1000毫克可溶型对乙酰氨基酚。60分钟后重新评估时,65.9%的患者数字评分量表(NRS)至少降低2分,平均降低2.24分(95%置信区间:2.03 - 2.45)。镇痛药物摄入的平均时间为5.9分钟(95%置信区间:3.8 - 8.1)。出院时重新评估时,33.2%的患者NRS评分降低>50%,平均降低39%(95%置信区间:35.3% - 41.9%)。患者满意度较高,平均值>9分(最高满意度 = 10)。

结论

该方案表明,通过患者在分诊时迅速接受有效的止痛治疗实现了最佳疼痛管理,从而使患者满意度大幅提高。在中度疼痛中,1000毫克可溶型对乙酰氨基酚使67.6%的患者NRS评分降低2分,证实其为急诊科的首选镇痛药。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4961/5652903/329806b0ae8e/jpr-10-2479Fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4961/5652903/17b5ffe3ab7d/jpr-10-2479Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4961/5652903/e6d92cfe5817/jpr-10-2479Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4961/5652903/d0355066cbe3/jpr-10-2479Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4961/5652903/412eea5735b3/jpr-10-2479Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4961/5652903/993de38e4bf2/jpr-10-2479Fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4961/5652903/329806b0ae8e/jpr-10-2479Fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4961/5652903/17b5ffe3ab7d/jpr-10-2479Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4961/5652903/e6d92cfe5817/jpr-10-2479Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4961/5652903/d0355066cbe3/jpr-10-2479Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4961/5652903/412eea5735b3/jpr-10-2479Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4961/5652903/993de38e4bf2/jpr-10-2479Fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4961/5652903/329806b0ae8e/jpr-10-2479Fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of the triage emergency department nursing protocol for the management of pain.评估分诊急诊科护理方案在疼痛管理中的有效性和效率。
J Pain Res. 2017 Oct 16;10:2479-2488. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S138850. eCollection 2017.
2
The Use of a Nurse-Initiated Pain Protocol in the Emergency Department for Patients with Musculoskeletal Injury: A Pre-Post Intervention Study.急诊科针对肌肉骨骼损伤患者采用护士启动的疼痛护理方案:一项干预前后对照研究。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2019 Dec;20(6):639-648. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 May 15.
3
Adult emergency department patients with sickle cell pain crisis: a learning collaborative model to improve analgesic management.成人急诊患者镰状细胞疼痛危象:改善镇痛管理的学习协作模式。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;17(4):399-407. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00693.x.
4
Multimodal oral analgesia for non-severe trauma patients: evaluation of a triage-nurse directed protocol combining methoxyflurane, paracetamol and oxycodone.多模式口腔镇痛用于非严重创伤患者:分诊护士指导的方案(结合甲氧氟烷、对乙酰氨基酚和羟考酮)的评估。
Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;14(7):1139-1145. doi: 10.1007/s11739-019-02147-8. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
5
Triage to Observation: A Quality Improvement Initiative for Chest Pain Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.分诊至观察区:针对急诊科胸痛患者的质量改进举措
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2019 Jun;18(2):75-79. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000175.
6
Does the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) represent the optimal tool for evaluating pain in the triage process of patients presenting to the ED? Results of a muticenter study.数字评定量表(NRS)是评估急诊科就诊患者分诊过程中疼痛的最佳工具吗?一项多中心研究的结果。
Acta Biomed. 2016 Jan 16;87(3):347-352.
7
The influence of triage systems and triage scores on timeliness of ED analgesic administration.分诊系统和分诊分数对急诊科镇痛药物给药及时性的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;26(8):867-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.11.020.
8
Pain Reduction Emergency Protocol: A Prospective Study Evaluating Impact of a Nurse-initiated Protocol on Pain Management and Parental Satisfaction.疼痛缓解急救方案:一项前瞻性研究,评估护士主导方案对疼痛管理和家长满意度的影响。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 Jan 1;38(1):e157-e164. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002193.
9
The use of inhaled nitrous oxide for analgesia in adult ED patients: a pilot study.成人急诊科患者吸入一氧化二氮用于镇痛的初步研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;34(2):269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.038. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
10
Efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia for patients with acute abdominal pain in the emergency department: a randomized trial.急诊患者中患者自控镇痛对急性腹痛的疗效:一项随机试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;19(4):370-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01322.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse Reactions Following First-Dose Administration of Co-Crystal of Tramadol-Celecoxib Versus Tramadol Alone for Moderate-To-Severe Acute Pain.曲马多 - 塞来昔布共晶与单独使用曲马多首剂给药治疗中度至重度急性疼痛后的不良反应
Pain Ther. 2025 Jun;14(3):1147-1154. doi: 10.1007/s40122-025-00730-w. Epub 2025 May 2.
2
Safety of Co-Crystal of Tramadol-Celecoxib (CTC) in Patients with Acute Moderate-to-Severe Pain: Pooled Analysis of Three Phase 3 Randomized Trials.曲马多-塞来昔布共晶(CTC)用于急性中重度疼痛患者的安全性:三项3期随机试验的汇总分析
Pain Ther. 2024 Dec;13(6):1617-1631. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00655-w. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Increased analgesia administration in emergency medicine after implementation of revised guidelines.修订指南实施后急诊医学中镇痛药物使用量增加。
Int J Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;9(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12245-016-0102-y. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
2
Italian Intersociety Recommendations on pain management in the emergency setting (SIAARTI, SIMEU, SIS 118, AISD, SIARED, SICUT, IRC).意大利跨学会关于急诊环境下疼痛管理的建议(SIAARTI、SIMEU、SIS 118、AISD、SIARED、SICUT、IRC)。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 Feb;81(2):205-25. Epub 2014 May 22.
3
Patients in pain that refuse acetaminophen at triage.
Present and Future of Pharmacological Management for Acute Moderate-to-Severe Postoperative, Traumatic, or Musculoskeletal Pain in Europe: A Narrative Review.
欧洲急性中重度术后、创伤性或肌肉骨骼疼痛的药物治疗现状与未来:叙述性综述
Pain Ther. 2024 Dec;13(6):1351-1376. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00645-y. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
4
Efficacy of Co-Crystal of Tramadol-Celecoxib (CTC) in Patients with Acute Moderate-to-Severe Pain: A Pooled Analysis of Data from Two Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials.曲马多-塞来昔布共晶(CTC)治疗急性中重度疼痛的疗效:两项 3 期随机临床试验数据的汇总分析。
Drugs R D. 2024 Jun;24(2):239-252. doi: 10.1007/s40268-024-00469-3. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
5
The Pain Management of Trauma Patients in the Emergency Department.急诊科创伤患者的疼痛管理
J Clin Med. 2023 May 5;12(9):3289. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093289.
6
Implementation of advanced triage in the Emergency Department of high complexity public hospital: Research protocol.高级分诊在高复杂度公立医院急诊科的实施:研究方案。
Nurs Open. 2023 Jun;10(6):4101-4110. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1622. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
7
Bedside Evaluation of Early VAS/NRS Based Protocols for Intravenous Morphine in the Emergency Department: Reasons for Poor Follow-Up and Targeted Practices.急诊科基于早期视觉模拟评分法/数字评定量表的静脉注射吗啡方案的床边评估:随访不佳的原因及针对性措施
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 29;10(21):5089. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215089.
8
Nurses' Behavior Regarding Pain Treatment in an Emergency Department: A Single-Center Observational Study.急诊科护士在疼痛治疗方面的行为:一项单中心观察性研究。
J Pain Res. 2020 Sep 22;13:2355-2359. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S266087. eCollection 2020.
9
Pain in emergency units: correlation with risk classification categories.急诊科的疼痛:与风险分类类别的相关性。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018 Nov 14;26:e3070. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2415.3070.
10
The Effectiveness of Near-Field Communication Integrated with a Mobile Electronic Medical Record System: Emergency Department Simulation Study.近场通信与移动电子病历系统集成的有效性:急诊科模拟研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Sep 21;6(9):e11187. doi: 10.2196/11187.
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;32(4):388-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.12.030. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
4
Emergency nurses' perceived barriers to demonstrating caring when managing adult patients' pain.急诊护士在处理成年患者疼痛时感知到的表达关怀的障碍。
J Emerg Nurs. 2012 May;38(3):218-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2010.09.017. Epub 2011 Jan 22.
5
Problems and barriers of pain management in the emergency department: Are we ever going to get better?急诊科疼痛管理的问题和障碍:我们会变得更好吗?
J Pain Res. 2008 Dec 9;2:5-11.
6
Quality of pain management in the emergency department: results of a multicentre prospective study.急诊科疼痛管理质量:一项多中心前瞻性研究的结果。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Feb;28(2):97-105. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283418fb0.
7
Factors influencing desired and received analgesia in emergency department.影响急诊科期望和获得镇痛效果的因素。
Intern Emerg Med. 2011 Feb;6(1):69-78. doi: 10.1007/s11739-010-0463-9. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
8
Level of pain and waiting time in the emergency department.急诊科的疼痛程度和等待时间。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2010 Jun;11(2):108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
9
Pain in the emergency department: adherence to an implemented treatment protocol.急诊科疼痛:遵循既定的治疗方案。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2010 Jun 12;140(23-24):341-7. doi: 10.4414/smw.2010.12975.
10
Use of a triage pain protocol in the ED.在急诊科使用分诊疼痛协议。
Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Sep;25(7):791-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.12.020.