• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字评定量表(NRS)是评估急诊科就诊患者分诊过程中疼痛的最佳工具吗?一项多中心研究的结果。

Does the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) represent the optimal tool for evaluating pain in the triage process of patients presenting to the ED? Results of a muticenter study.

作者信息

Capponi Rebecca, Loguercio Valentina, Guerrini Stefania, Beltrami Giampietro, Vesprini Andrea, Giostra Fabrizio

机构信息

.

出版信息

Acta Biomed. 2016 Jan 16;87(3):347-352.

PMID:28112706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10521894/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Pain evaluation at triage in Emergency Department (ED) is fundamental, as it influences significantly patients color code determination. Different scales have been proposed to quantify pain but they are not always reliable. This study aims to determine a) how important is for triage nurses pain measurement b) reliability of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the most used instrument to evaluate pain in Italian EDs, because it frequently shows higher pain scores than others scales.

METHODS

End point 1: a questionnaire was administered to triage nurses in some hospitals of northern Italy. End point 2: 250 patients arriving at the ED referring pain have been evaluated using, randomly, either the NRS or a fake "30-50" scale.

RESULTS

End point 1: Triage nurses acknowledge to modify frequently the referred pain intensity. This for several reasons: nurses think that patients may exaggerate to obtain a higher priority color code; they may be influenced by specific patients categories (non EU citizens, drugs-addicted, elderly); the pain score referred by patients is not correspondent to nurse perception. End point 2: Data show that the mean value obtained with NRS is significantly (p<0.05) higher that the mean obtained with the "30-50" scale.

CONCLUSION

Manipulation on pain evaluation performed by nurses might result in a dangerous underestimation of this symptom. At the same time, the use of NRS seems to allow patients to exaggerate pain perception with consequent altered attribution of color code at triage.

摘要

未标注

急诊科分诊时的疼痛评估至关重要,因为它会显著影响患者颜色代码的确定。已经提出了不同的量表来量化疼痛,但它们并不总是可靠的。本研究旨在确定:a)分诊护士进行疼痛测量的重要性如何;b)数字评分量表(NRS)的可靠性,NRS是意大利急诊科评估疼痛最常用的工具,因为它经常显示出比其他量表更高的疼痛评分。

方法

终点1:对意大利北部一些医院的分诊护士进行问卷调查。终点2:随机使用NRS或假的“30 - 50”量表对250名因疼痛前来急诊科的患者进行评估。

结果

终点1:分诊护士承认经常会修改所报告的疼痛强度。原因如下:护士认为患者可能会夸大疼痛以获得更高优先级的颜色代码;他们可能会受到特定患者类别(非欧盟公民、吸毒成瘾者、老年人)的影响;患者报告的疼痛评分与护士的感知不相符。终点2:数据显示,使用NRS获得的平均值显著高于(p<0.05)使用“30 - 50”量表获得的平均值。

结论

护士对疼痛评估的操作可能会导致对该症状的危险低估。同时,使用NRS似乎会让患者夸大疼痛感知,从而在分诊时改变颜色代码的分配。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b2/10521894/d7056199b234/ACTA-87-347-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b2/10521894/621ff944defc/ACTA-87-347-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b2/10521894/406c90a9fff7/ACTA-87-347-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b2/10521894/dc7c74e9e6f7/ACTA-87-347-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b2/10521894/d7056199b234/ACTA-87-347-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b2/10521894/621ff944defc/ACTA-87-347-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b2/10521894/406c90a9fff7/ACTA-87-347-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b2/10521894/dc7c74e9e6f7/ACTA-87-347-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b2/10521894/d7056199b234/ACTA-87-347-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Does the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) represent the optimal tool for evaluating pain in the triage process of patients presenting to the ED? Results of a muticenter study.数字评定量表(NRS)是评估急诊科就诊患者分诊过程中疼痛的最佳工具吗?一项多中心研究的结果。
Acta Biomed. 2016 Jan 16;87(3):347-352.
2
Accuracy of emergency nurses in assessment of patients' pain.急诊护士评估患者疼痛的准确性。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2003 Dec;4(4):171-5. doi: 10.1016/s1524-9042(03)00033-x.
3
The Use of a Nurse-Initiated Pain Protocol in the Emergency Department for Patients with Musculoskeletal Injury: A Pre-Post Intervention Study.急诊科针对肌肉骨骼损伤患者采用护士启动的疼痛护理方案:一项干预前后对照研究。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2019 Dec;20(6):639-648. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 May 15.
4
A comparison of three self-report pain scales in adults with acute pain.三种自我报告疼痛量表在急性疼痛成人患者中的比较。
J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;48(1):10-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.07.039. Epub 2014 Sep 27.
5
High inter-observer agreement of observer-perceived pain assessment in the emergency department.急诊科观察者对疼痛评估的观察者间一致性较高。
BMC Emerg Med. 2018 Feb 21;18(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12873-018-0159-4.
6
Pain assessment in the Emergency Department. Correlation between pain rated by the patient and by the nurse. An observational study.急诊科的疼痛评估。患者与护士所评定疼痛之间的相关性。一项观察性研究。
Acta Biomed. 2018 Feb 27;89(4-S):64-70. doi: 10.23750/abm.v89i4-S.7055.
7
Pain assessment by emergency nurses at triage in the emergency department: A qualitative study.急诊护士在急诊科分诊时的疼痛评估:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(3-4):669-676. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13992. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
8
Pain rating in the ED-a comparison between 2 scales in a Swedish hospital.急诊科的疼痛评分——瑞典一家医院两种量表的比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;33(3):419-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.12.069. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
9
Comparison of four pain scales in children with acute abdominal pain in a pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊科急性腹痛患儿四种疼痛量表的比较
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;50(4):379-83, 383.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.04.021. Epub 2007 Jun 22.
10
Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department.用于急诊科的急性疼痛口头数字评定量表的验证
Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Apr;10(4):390-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01355.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Occurrence of Delirium during ECMO Therapy in a Critical Care Unit in Poland-A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.波兰重症监护病房体外膜肺氧合治疗期间谵妄的发生:一项横断面初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 12;18(8):4029. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084029.

本文引用的文献

1
Pain as the fifth vital sign: exposing the vital need for pain education.疼痛作为第五大生命体征:揭示疼痛教育的重要性。
Clin Ther. 2013 Nov;35(11):1728-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.10.001. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
2
The future of pain management in emergency medicine.
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2005 May;23(2):467-75. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2004.12.011.
3
Pain assessment instruments for use in the emergency department.用于急诊科的疼痛评估工具。
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2005 May;23(2):285-95. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2004.12.002.