Suppr超能文献

肺部超声诊断呼吸机相关性肺炎的准确性及其应用:系统评价。

Accuracy and Applications of Lung Ultrasound to Diagnose Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

1 Emergency Department of University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

2 Intensive Care Unit of Nereu Ramos Hospital, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

出版信息

J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Aug;33(8):447-455. doi: 10.1177/0885066617737756. Epub 2017 Oct 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lung ultrasound (LUS) is an accurate tool to diagnose community-acquired pneumonia. However, it is not yet an established tool to diagnose ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

PURPOSE

To assess the evidence about LUS in the diagnosis of VAP, we conducted a systematic review of the literature.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and LILACS. Two researchers independently selected the studies that met the inclusion criteria. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the quality of the studies. In a qualitative synthesis, 3 questions guided the review: Q1. What are the sonographic signs of VAP? Q2. How can LUS be combined with others tests or signs of VAP? Q3. What is the role of LUS in VAP screening?

MAIN RESULTS

Three studies (n = 377 patients) with different designs were included. In terms of Q1, the 3 studies assessed the accuracy of sonographic consolidations. In patients suspected for VAP, lobar or hemilobar consolidation alone was not sufficient to diagnose VAP but seems useful to exclude it. The most useful signs were small subpleural consolidations (sensitivity: 81%; specificity: 41%) and dynamic air bronchograms (sensitivity: 44%; specificity: 81%). Two studies were assessed for Q2, when the 2 signs above were included in a clinical score (Ventilator-associated Pneumonia Lung Ultrasound Score associated with quantitative culture of endotracheal aspirate-VPLUS-EAquant), the accuracy was amplified (sensitivity: 48% and specificity: 97% for score ≥4; sensitivity: 78% and specificity: 77% for score ≥3 points). Finally, regarding Q3, no studies have assessed the use of LUS in screening of VAP.

CONCLUSION

Small subpleural consolidations and dynamic air bronchograms were the most useful sonographic signs to diagnose VAP in suspected patients. Clinical scores including LUS had better diagnosis accuracy than LUS alone. There are no data on LUS for VAP screening.

摘要

背景

肺部超声(LUS)是诊断社区获得性肺炎的一种准确工具。然而,它尚未成为诊断呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的既定工具。

目的

为了评估 LUS 在诊断 VAP 中的证据,我们对文献进行了系统回顾。

方法

我们在 PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science 和 LILACS 中进行了搜索。两名研究人员独立选择符合纳入标准的研究。使用诊断准确性研究的质量评估工具(QUADAS-2)评估研究的质量。在定性综合中,有 3 个问题指导了综述:Q1. VAP 的超声征象是什么?Q2. LUS 如何与其他 VAP 检测或征象结合?Q3. LUS 在 VAP 筛查中的作用是什么?

主要结果

纳入了 3 项(n = 377 名患者)不同设计的研究。就 Q1 而言,这 3 项研究评估了超声实变的准确性。在疑似 VAP 的患者中,单独的肺叶或半肺实变不足以诊断 VAP,但似乎有助于排除它。最有用的征象是小的胸膜下实变(敏感性:81%;特异性:41%)和动态空气支气管征(敏感性:44%;特异性:81%)。有 2 项研究评估了 Q2,当上述 2 个征象被纳入一个临床评分(与经气管抽吸定量培养相关的呼吸机相关性肺炎肺部超声评分- VPLUS-EAquant)时,准确性得到了放大(评分≥4 时的敏感性:48%和特异性:97%;评分≥3 分时的敏感性:78%和特异性:77%)。最后,关于 Q3,没有研究评估 LUS 在 VAP 筛查中的应用。

结论

小的胸膜下实变和动态空气支气管征是疑似患者诊断 VAP 最有用的超声征象。包括 LUS 的临床评分比单独使用 LUS 具有更高的诊断准确性。没有关于 LUS 用于 VAP 筛查的数据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验