• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用日本医学、护理和自然科学专业的大学生样本对乌得勒支学生工作投入量表(UWES-S)进行项目反应理论分析。

Item response theory analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students (UWES-S) using a sample of Japanese university and college students majoring medical science, nursing, and natural science.

作者信息

Tsubakita Takashi, Shimazaki Kazuyo, Ito Hiroshi, Kawazoe Nobuo

机构信息

Nagoya University of Commerce and Business, 4-4, Sagamine, Komenoki-cho, Nisshin-shi, Aichi-ken, Japan.

Department of Nursing College of Life and Health Sciences, Chubu University, 1200 Matsumoto-cho, Kasugai-shi, Aichi-ken, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2017 Oct 30;10(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2839-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13104-017-2839-7
PMID:29084577
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5663090/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students has been used internationally to assess students' academic engagement, but it has not been analyzed via item response theory. The purpose of this study was to conduct an item response theory analysis of the Japanese version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students translated by authors. Using a two-parameter model and Samejima's graded response model, difficulty and discrimination parameters were estimated after confirming the factor structure of the scale.

RESULTS

The 14 items on the scale were analyzed with a sample of 3214 university and college students majoring medical science, nursing, or natural science in Japan. The preliminary parameter estimation was conducted with the two parameter model, and indicated that three items should be removed because there were outlier parameters. Final parameter estimation was conducted using the survived 11 items, and indicated that all difficulty and discrimination parameters were acceptable. The test information curve suggested that the scale better assesses higher engagement than average engagement. The estimated parameters provide a basis for future comparative studies. The results also suggested that a 7-point Likert scale is too broad; thus, the scaling should be modified to fewer graded scaling structure.

摘要

目的

乌得勒支学生工作投入量表已在国际上用于评估学生的学业投入,但尚未通过项目反应理论进行分析。本研究的目的是对作者翻译的日语版乌得勒支学生工作投入量表进行项目反应理论分析。在确认量表的因子结构后,使用两参数模型和Samejima的分级反应模型估计难度和区分度参数。

结果

该量表的14个项目以日本3214名医学、护理或自然科学专业的大学生为样本进行了分析。使用两参数模型进行初步参数估计,结果表明有三个项目因参数异常应予以删除。使用剩余的11个项目进行最终参数估计,结果表明所有难度和区分度参数都是可接受的。测试信息曲线表明,该量表对较高投入程度的评估优于平均投入程度。估计的参数为未来的比较研究提供了基础。结果还表明,7点李克特量表过于宽泛;因此,应将量表改为分级较少的结构。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6e0/5663090/35fd6c228ea7/13104_2017_2839_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6e0/5663090/35fd6c228ea7/13104_2017_2839_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6e0/5663090/35fd6c228ea7/13104_2017_2839_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Item response theory analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students (UWES-S) using a sample of Japanese university and college students majoring medical science, nursing, and natural science.使用日本医学、护理和自然科学专业的大学生样本对乌得勒支学生工作投入量表(UWES-S)进行项目反应理论分析。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Oct 30;10(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2839-7.
2
Psychometric Properties of Spanish Version Student Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-S-9) in High-school Students.高中生西班牙语版学生乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES-S-9)的心理测量特性。
Span J Psychol. 2019 May 13;22:E21. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2019.25.
3
Validity and reliability of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-Student Version in Sri Lanka.乌得勒支工作投入量表学生版在斯里兰卡的效度和信度
BMC Res Notes. 2018 May 4;11(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3388-4.
4
A confirmatory factor analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students in a Chinese sample.乌得勒支学生工作投入量表在中国样本中的验证性因素分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Feb;49:129-134. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.017. Epub 2016 Nov 26.
5
Korean Version of the 17-Item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for University Students: A Validity and Reliability Study.大学生17项乌得勒支工作投入量表韩语版:效度与信度研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Mar 29;10(4):642. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040642.
6
Dimensionality of the 9-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9).9项乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES-9)的维度
Psychol Rep. 2013 Jun;112(3):788-99. doi: 10.2466/01.03.PR0.112.3.788-799.
7
Utrecht work engagement scale: Construct validity and reliability in Chilean health science students.乌得勒支工作投入量表:智利卫生科学专业学生的建构效度和信度。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Nov;71(11):2519-2523. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.292.
8
Organisational Justice, Burnout, and Engagement in University Students: A Comparison between Stressful Aspects of Labour and University Organisation.组织公正、倦怠与大学生敬业度:劳动压力与大学组织方面的比较
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 26;15(10):2116. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102116.
9
Do we all agree on how to measure work engagement? Factorial validity of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale as a standard measurement tool - A literature review.我们是否都认同如何衡量工作投入度?作为一种标准测量工具的乌得勒支工作投入量表的因素效度——一项文献综述。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017 Mar 30;30(2):161-175. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00947. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
10
Interprofessional education and collaborative practice: Psychometric analysis of the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale in undergraduate Serbian healthcare student context.跨专业教育与合作实践:塞尔维亚本科医疗保健专业学生的跨专业学习准备度量表的心理计量学分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jun;65:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Work engagement, resilience and turnover intentions among nurses: a mediation analysis.护士的工作投入、复原力与离职意向:一项中介效应分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 14;25(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12242-6.
2
Criteria for detection of possible risk factors for mental health problems in undergraduate university students.本科大学生心理健康问题潜在风险因素的检测标准。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 29;14:1184156. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1184156. eCollection 2023.
3
Exploring L2 Engagement: A Large-Scale Survey of Secondary School Students.

本文引用的文献

1
Single Sample Cross-Validation Indices for Covariance Structures.协方差结构的单样本交叉验证指标
Multivariate Behav Res. 1989 Oct 1;24(4):445-55. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2404_4.
2
From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation.从始至终:一种实用的方法,解决普遍存在的内部一致性估计问题。
Br J Psychol. 2014 Aug;105(3):399-412. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12046. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
3
Association of academic performance of premedical students to satisfaction and engagement in a short training program: a cross sectional study presenting gender differences.
探索第二语言参与度:一项针对中学生的大规模调查
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 14;13:868825. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.868825. eCollection 2022.
4
Validity and reliability of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-Student Version in Sri Lanka.乌得勒支工作投入量表学生版在斯里兰卡的效度和信度
BMC Res Notes. 2018 May 4;11(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3388-4.
5
Brazil-Portugal Transcultural Adaptation of the UWES-9: Internal Consistency, Dimensionality, and Measurement Invariance.《工作投入量表-9项版的巴西-葡萄牙跨文化调适:内部一致性、维度性和测量不变性》
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 20;9:353. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00353. eCollection 2018.
医学预科学生的学业成绩与短期培训项目中的满意度和参与度之间的关联:一项呈现性别差异的横断面研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Feb 24;7:105. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-105.
4
Construct dimensionality of engagement and its relation with satisfaction.构建参与度的维度及其与满意度的关系。
J Psychol. 2009 Jan;143(1):91-111. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.143.1.91-112.
5
AIC model selection using Akaike weights.使用赤池权重进行AIC模型选择。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Feb;11(1):192-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03206482.