• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《工作投入量表-9项版的巴西-葡萄牙跨文化调适:内部一致性、维度性和测量不变性》

Brazil-Portugal Transcultural Adaptation of the UWES-9: Internal Consistency, Dimensionality, and Measurement Invariance.

作者信息

Sinval Jorge, Pasian Sonia, Queirós Cristina, Marôco João

机构信息

Faculty of Philosophy, Sciences and Letters of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 20;9:353. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00353. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00353
PMID:29618995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5872586/
Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present a revision of international versions of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale and to describe the psychometric properties of a Portuguese version of the UWES-9 developed simultaneously for Brazil and Portugal, the validity evidence related with the internal structure, namely, Dimensionality, measurement invariance between Brazil and Portugal, and Reliability of the scores. This is the first UWES version developed simultaneously for both countries, and it is an important instrument for understanding employees' work engagement in the organizations, allowing human resources departments to better use workforces, especially when they are migrants. A total of 524 Brazilian workers and 522 Portuguese workers participated in the study. Confirmatory Factor Analysis, group comparisons, and Reliability estimates were used. The use of workers who were primarily professionals or administrative support, according to ISCO-08, reinforced the need to collect data on other professional occupations. Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable fit for the UWES-9 original three-factor solution, and a second-order factor structure has been proposed that presented an acceptable fit. Full-scale invariance was obtained between the Portuguese and Brazilian samples, both for the original three-factor first-order and second-order models. Data revealed that Portuguese and Brazilian workers didn't show statistically significant differences in the work engagement dimensions. This version allows for direct comparisons of means and, consequently, for performance of comparative and cross-cultural studies between these two countries.

摘要

本文旨在对乌得勒支工作投入量表的国际版本进行修订,并描述同时为巴西和葡萄牙开发的葡萄牙语版UWES-9的心理测量特性、与内部结构相关的效度证据,即维度性、巴西和葡萄牙之间的测量不变性以及分数的可靠性。这是首个同时为两国开发的UWES版本,是了解组织中员工工作投入情况的重要工具,有助于人力资源部门更好地利用劳动力,尤其是当员工为移民时。共有524名巴西员工和522名葡萄牙员工参与了该研究。研究采用了验证性因素分析、组间比较和可靠性估计。根据国际标准职业分类-08(ISCO-08),主要使用专业人员或行政支持人员的数据,这凸显了收集其他职业数据的必要性。验证性因素分析表明,UWES-9最初的三因素解决方案拟合度可接受,并提出了一个二阶因素结构,其拟合度也可接受。对于最初的三因素一阶和二阶模型而言,葡萄牙和巴西样本之间均获得了完全尺度不变性。数据显示,葡萄牙和巴西员工在工作投入维度上没有统计学上的显著差异。该版本允许直接比较均值,从而可以在这两个国家之间进行比较研究和跨文化研究。

相似文献

1
Brazil-Portugal Transcultural Adaptation of the UWES-9: Internal Consistency, Dimensionality, and Measurement Invariance.《工作投入量表-9项版的巴西-葡萄牙跨文化调适:内部一致性、维度性和测量不变性》
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 20;9:353. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00353. eCollection 2018.
2
Work Engagement among Rescue Workers: Psychometric Properties of the Portuguese UWES.救援人员的工作投入:葡萄牙语版工作投入量表(UWES)的心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 22;8:2229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02229. eCollection 2017.
3
Transcultural Adaptation of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) for Brazil and Portugal.针对巴西和葡萄牙的《奥尔登堡倦怠量表》(OLBI)跨文化调适
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 12;10:338. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00338. eCollection 2019.
4
[Maslach Burnout Inventory - Student Survey: Portugal-Brazil cross-cultural adaptation].[马氏倦怠量表-学生版:葡萄牙-巴西跨文化适应性研究]
Rev Saude Publica. 2012 Oct;46(5):816-24. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102012000500008.
5
Work Engagement in Serbia: Psychometric Properties of the Serbian Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES).塞尔维亚的工作投入:乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES)塞尔维亚语版的心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 16;8:1799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01799. eCollection 2017.
6
Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT): Validity Evidence from Brazil and Portugal.倦怠评估工具(BAT):来自巴西和葡萄牙的有效性证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 25;19(3):1344. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031344.
7
The Multidimensional Daily Diary of Fatigue-Fibromyalgia-17 Items (MDF-Fibro-17): Evidence from Validity, Reliability and Transcultural Invariance between Portugal and Brazil.疲劳-纤维肌痛多维日常日记-17项量表(MDF-Fibro-17):葡萄牙与巴西之间效度、信度及跨文化不变性的证据
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 22;9(8):2330. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082330.
8
Openness Toward Organizational Change Scale (OTOCS): Validity evidence from Brazil and Portugal.组织变革开放性量表(OTOCS):来自巴西和葡萄牙的效度证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 19;16(4):e0249986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249986. eCollection 2021.
9
Psychometric Properties of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) in a Sample of Active Health Care Professionals in Spain.西班牙在职医护人员样本中乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES-9)的心理测量特性
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Nov 30;15:3461-3472. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S387242. eCollection 2022.
10
The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students (UWES-9S): Factorial Validity, Reliability, and Measurement Invariance in a Chilean Sample of Undergraduate University Students.乌得勒支大学生工作投入量表(UWES-9S):智利本科大学生样本中的因子效度、信度和测量不变性
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 30;10:1017. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01017. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
The Daily Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Work Engagement of Nurses: A 'Shortitudinal' Diary Study.护士的日常基本心理需求满足与工作投入:一项“纵向”日记研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 6;10(5):863. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050863.
2
Promoting a sense of belonging, engagement, and collegiality to reduce burnout: a mixed methods study among undergraduate medical students in a non-Western, Asian context.在非西方的亚洲背景下,通过促进归属感、参与感和同事关系来减少倦怠感:一项针对本科医学生的混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 28;22(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03380-0.
3
Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT): Validity Evidence from Brazil and Portugal.

本文引用的文献

1
Work Engagement among Rescue Workers: Psychometric Properties of the Portuguese UWES.救援人员的工作投入:葡萄牙语版工作投入量表(UWES)的心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 22;8:2229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02229. eCollection 2017.
2
Work Engagement in Serbia: Psychometric Properties of the Serbian Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES).塞尔维亚的工作投入:乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES)塞尔维亚语版的心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 16;8:1799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01799. eCollection 2017.
3
Item response theory analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students (UWES-S) using a sample of Japanese university and college students majoring medical science, nursing, and natural science.
倦怠评估工具(BAT):来自巴西和葡萄牙的有效性证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 25;19(3):1344. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031344.
4
Initial Validation of the Mindful Presence Scale: The Issue of the Construal Level of Scale Items.正念存在量表的初步验证:量表项目的解释水平问题。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 21;12:626084. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626084. eCollection 2021.
5
Having the Cake and Eating It Too: First-Order, Second-Order and Bifactor Representations of Work Engagement.鱼与熊掌兼得:工作投入的一阶、二阶和双因素模型
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 22;12:615581. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.615581. eCollection 2021.
6
Openness Toward Organizational Change Scale (OTOCS): Validity evidence from Brazil and Portugal.组织变革开放性量表(OTOCS):来自巴西和葡萄牙的效度证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 19;16(4):e0249986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249986. eCollection 2021.
7
Development of the Referee Shared Mental Models Measure (RSMMM).裁判共享心智模型量表(RSMMM)的开发。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 19;11:550271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.550271. eCollection 2020.
8
Short Index of Job Satisfaction: Validity evidence from Portugal and Brazil.简短工作满意度指数:来自葡萄牙和巴西的效度证据。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 14;15(4):e0231474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231474. eCollection 2020.
9
Age-Diversity Practices and Retirement Preferences Among Older Workers: A Moderated Mediation Model of Work Engagement and Work Ability.老年员工的年龄多元化实践与退休偏好:工作投入与工作能力的调节中介模型
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 27;10:1937. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01937. eCollection 2019.
10
The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students (UWES-9S): Factorial Validity, Reliability, and Measurement Invariance in a Chilean Sample of Undergraduate University Students.乌得勒支大学生工作投入量表(UWES-9S):智利本科大学生样本中的因子效度、信度和测量不变性
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 30;10:1017. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01017. eCollection 2019.
使用日本医学、护理和自然科学专业的大学生样本对乌得勒支学生工作投入量表(UWES-S)进行项目反应理论分析。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Oct 30;10(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2839-7.
4
Measuring engagement in nurses: the psychometric properties of the Persian version of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.测量护士的工作投入度:乌得勒支工作投入量表波斯语版的心理测量特性
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017 Feb 28;31:15. doi: 10.18869/mjiri.31.15. eCollection 2017.
5
One, two or three dimensions of work engagement? Testing the factorial validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale on a sample of Polish employees.工作投入的一维、二维还是三维?在波兰员工样本中检验乌得勒支工作投入量表的因子效度。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2019 Jun;25(2):241-249. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1371958. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
6
Building work engagement: A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of work engagement interventions.构建工作投入度:一项关于工作投入干预效果的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Organ Behav. 2017 Jul;38(6):792-812. doi: 10.1002/job.2167. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
7
Is a Transdisciplinary Theory of Engagement in Organized Settings Possible? A Concept Analysis of the Literature on Employee Engagement, Consumer Engagement and Patient Engagement.是否有可能形成一种关于在有组织环境中参与的跨学科理论?对员工参与、消费者参与和患者参与相关文献的概念分析。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 6;8:872. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00872. eCollection 2017.
8
Work Engagement in South Korea.韩国的工作投入度。
Psychol Rep. 2017 Jun;120(3):561-578. doi: 10.1177/0033294117697085. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
9
Do we all agree on how to measure work engagement? Factorial validity of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale as a standard measurement tool - A literature review.我们是否都认同如何衡量工作投入度?作为一种标准测量工具的乌得勒支工作投入量表的因素效度——一项文献综述。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017 Mar 30;30(2):161-175. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00947. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
10
Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research.测量不变性的惯例与报告:心理学研究的现状与未来方向
Dev Rev. 2016 Sep;41:71-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 29.