Suppr超能文献

谁来判定被告是否患有精神障碍?关于欧洲人权法院一个案件的法医学考量

Who Establishes the Presence of a Mental Disorder in Defendants? Medicolegal Considerations on a European Court of Human Rights Case.

作者信息

Kooijmans Tijs, Meynen Gerben

机构信息

Tilburg Law School, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.

Faculty of Humanities, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 16;8:199. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00199. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Legal insanity is a peculiar element of criminal law, because it brings together two very different disciplines: psychiatry and psychology on the one hand and the law on the other. One of the basic questions regarding evaluations of defendants concerns the question of who should establish "true mental disorder," the judge or the behavioral expert? This question is complicated, and in this contribution it will be explored based on a Dutch case that was eventually decided by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). We will argue that the ECtHR provides a valuable legal framework. Based on its merits, the framework could also be of interest to countries outside the Court's jurisdiction.

摘要

法律上的精神错乱是刑法中的一个特殊元素,因为它将两个截然不同的学科结合在一起:一方面是精神病学和心理学,另一方面是法律。关于对被告评估的一个基本问题涉及应由谁来确定“真正的精神障碍”,是法官还是行为专家?这个问题很复杂,在本论文中,将基于一个最终由欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)裁决的荷兰案例来探讨。我们将论证欧洲人权法院提供了一个有价值的法律框架。基于其优点,该框架可能也会引起法院管辖范围之外国家的兴趣。

相似文献

3
The United States Supreme Court and psychiatry in the 1990s.20世纪90年代的美国最高法院与精神病学
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1999 Mar;22(1):197-211. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(05)70069-1.
7
Coercive neuroimaging, criminal law, and privacy: a European perspective.强制神经成像、刑法与隐私:欧洲视角
J Law Biosci. 2019 Oct 9;6(1):289-309. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsz015. eCollection 2019 Oct.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验