Kooijmans Tijs, Meynen Gerben
Tilburg Law School, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Faculty of Humanities, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Front Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 16;8:199. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00199. eCollection 2017.
Legal insanity is a peculiar element of criminal law, because it brings together two very different disciplines: psychiatry and psychology on the one hand and the law on the other. One of the basic questions regarding evaluations of defendants concerns the question of who should establish "true mental disorder," the judge or the behavioral expert? This question is complicated, and in this contribution it will be explored based on a Dutch case that was eventually decided by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). We will argue that the ECtHR provides a valuable legal framework. Based on its merits, the framework could also be of interest to countries outside the Court's jurisdiction.
法律上的精神错乱是刑法中的一个特殊元素,因为它将两个截然不同的学科结合在一起:一方面是精神病学和心理学,另一方面是法律。关于对被告评估的一个基本问题涉及应由谁来确定“真正的精神障碍”,是法官还是行为专家?这个问题很复杂,在本论文中,将基于一个最终由欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)裁决的荷兰案例来探讨。我们将论证欧洲人权法院提供了一个有价值的法律框架。基于其优点,该框架可能也会引起法院管辖范围之外国家的兴趣。