Suppr超能文献

在 LED 和带滤光片的 LED 光源中使用口腔内数字分光光度计分析天然牙的比色匹配。

Analysis of Shade Matching in Natural Dentitions Using Intraoral Digital Spectrophotometer in LED and Filtered LED Light Sources.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, SRM Dental College Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e68-e73. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12665. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the shade matching capabilities in natural dentitions using Vita Toothguide 3D-Master and an intraoral digital spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade Advance 4.0) in various light sources.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants between 20 and 40 years old with natural, unrestored right maxillary central incisors, no history of bleaching, orthodontic treatment, or malocclusion and no rotations were included. According to their shades, subjects were randomly selected and grouped into A1, A2, and A3. A total of 100 participants (50 male and 50 female) in each group were chosen for this study. Shade selection was made between 10 am and 2 pm for all light sources. The same examiner selected the shade of natural teeth with Vita Toothguide 3D-Master under natural light within 2 minutes. Once the Vita Toothguide 3D-Masterwas matched with the maxillary right central incisor, the L*, a*, and b* values, chroma, and hue were recorded with Vita Easyshade Advance 4.0 by placing it on the shade tab under the same light source. The values were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD post hoc test with SPSS v22.0 software.

RESULTS

The mean ∆E* values for shades A1, A2, and A3 for groups 1, 2, and 3 were statistically significantly different from each other (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The intraoral digital spectrophotometer showed statistically significant differences in shade matching compared to Vita Toothguide 3D-Master. Incandescent light showed more accurate shade matching than the filtered LED, LED, and daylight.

摘要

目的

评估 Vita Toothguide 3D-Master 和口腔内数字分光光度计(Vita Easyshade Advance 4.0)在不同光源下对天然牙色匹配能力。

材料与方法

纳入 20 至 40 岁、右侧上颌中切牙天然、未修复、无漂白、正畸或错颌畸形、无旋转的参与者。根据他们的色调,随机选择受试者并分为 A1、A2 和 A3 组。每组共有 100 名参与者(50 名男性和 50 名女性)参与本研究。所有光源的色调选择均在上午 10 点至下午 2 点之间进行。同一检查者在自然光下使用 Vita Toothguide 3D-Master 在 2 分钟内选择天然牙齿的色调。一旦 Vita Toothguide 3D-Master 与上颌右侧中切牙匹配,就在同一光源下将其放在色调标签上,用 Vita Easyshade Advance 4.0 记录 L*、a*、b*值、彩度和色调。使用 SPSS v22.0 软件对数据进行单因素方差分析和 Tukey 的 HSD 事后检验进行统计学分析。

结果

第 1、2 和 3 组的 A1、A2 和 A3 色调的平均 ∆E*值彼此之间存在统计学显著差异(p<0.001)。

结论

与 Vita Toothguide 3D-Master 相比,口腔内数字分光光度计在色调匹配方面显示出统计学显著差异。白炽灯光比过滤式 LED、LED 和日光更能准确匹配色调。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验