Suppr超能文献

医疗保险和军事医疗保健系统的地域差异。

Geographic variation in Medicare and the military healthcare system.

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont St, 4-020, Boston, MA 02120. E-mail:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2017 Aug 1;23(8):e259-e264.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare geographic variation in healthcare spending and utilization between the Military Health System (MHS) and Medicare across hospital referral regions (HRRs).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

METHODS

Data on age-, sex-, and race-adjusted Medicare per capita expenditure and utilization measures by HRR were obtained from the Dartmouth Atlas for 2007 to 2010. Similarly, adjusted data from 2007 and 2010 were obtained from the MHS Data Repository and patients assigned to HRRs. We compared high- and low-spending regions, and computed coefficient of variation (CoV) and correlation coefficients for healthcare spending, hospital inpatient days, hip surgery, and back surgery between MHS and Medicare patients.

RESULTS

We found significant variation in spending and utilization across HRRs in both the MHS and Medicare. CoV for spending was higher in the MHS compared with Medicare, (0.24 vs 0.15, respectively) and CoV for inpatient days was 0.36 in the MHS versus 0.19 in Medicare. The CoV for back surgery was also greater in the MHS compared with Medicare (0.47 vs 0.29, respectively). Per capita Medicare spending per HRR was significantly correlated to adjusted MHS spending (r = 0.3; P <.0001). Correlation in inpatient days (r = 0.29; P <.0001) and back surgery (r = 0.52; P <.0001) was also significant. Higher spending markets in both systems were not comparable; lower spending markets were located mostly in the Midwest.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparing 2 systems with similar pricing schemes, differences in spending likely reflect variation in utilization and the influence of local provider culture.

摘要

目的

比较军事医疗保障体系(MHS)和医疗保险在医院转诊区(HRR)之间的医疗支出和利用的地域差异。

研究设计

回顾性分析。

方法

从达特茅斯地图集获取了 2007 年至 2010 年按年龄、性别和种族调整的医疗保险人均支出和按 HRR 调整的利用措施的数据。同样,从 MHS 数据存储库中获得了 2007 年和 2010 年的调整数据,并将患者分配到 HRR。我们比较了高支出和低支出地区,并计算了 MHS 和医疗保险患者之间医疗支出、住院天数、髋关节手术和背部手术的变异系数(CoV)和相关系数。

结果

我们发现 MHS 和医疗保险在 HRR 之间的支出和利用存在显著差异。MHS 的支出 CoV 高于医疗保险,分别为 0.24 和 0.15,住院天数的 CoV 分别为 0.36 和 0.19。MHS 的背部手术 CoV 也高于医疗保险,分别为 0.47 和 0.29。每个 HRR 的医疗保险人均支出与调整后的 MHS 支出显著相关(r = 0.3;P <.0001)。住院天数(r = 0.29;P <.0001)和背部手术(r = 0.52;P <.0001)的相关性也很显著。两个系统中较高的支出市场不可比;较低的支出市场主要位于中西部。

结论

在比较两个具有类似定价方案的系统时,支出差异可能反映了利用差异和当地提供者文化的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验