Shannon Robert, Donovan-Hall Maggie, Bruton Anne
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Southampton NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 31;12(10):e0187335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187335. eCollection 2017.
Motivational interviewing (MI) is a method for building motivation for behaviour change that has potential for use in respiratory contexts. There is a paucity of published research exploring the feasibility of this intervention from the clinicians' perspective. This study aimed to explore respiratory clinicians' views of MI: Is it perceived as useful? Could it be integrated into practice? What training would be required to make it part of routine care? Nine respiratory clinicians attended a one-day MI workshop and a semi-structured face-to-face interview two weeks later. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed with thematic analysis. Four main themes are presented-1) MI's suitability for use in respiratory contexts: participants saw potential in using MI to motivate their patients to engage with prescribed respiratory interventions, such as increased physical activity. Those who experimented with new skills post-workshop were encouraged by patient responsiveness and outcomes. 2) MI's relationship with routine clinical practice: some believed they already used elements of MI, but most participants felt MI was fundamentally 'different' to their normal style of working. 3) Implementation issues: additional time would need to be made available to enable an appropriate depth of conversation. 4) Training issues: Participants sensed the complexity of MI could make it difficult to learn and that it would take them time to become competent. On-going supervision was perceived as necessary. One key challenge identified was how to suppress behaviours that are antithetical to MI. These findings lend support to the feasibility of using MI in respiratory contexts such as pulmonary rehabilitation programmes, but highlight implementation and training issues that would need to be overcome. The insights have informed the development of another study, testing the effect of a tailored training package on MI skill, specifically for respiratory clinicians delivering pulmonary rehabilitation programmes.
动机性访谈(MI)是一种激发行为改变动机的方法,在呼吸领域具有应用潜力。从临床医生的角度出发,探索这种干预措施可行性的已发表研究较少。本研究旨在探讨呼吸科临床医生对动机性访谈的看法:它是否被认为有用?能否融入实践?将其纳入常规护理需要哪些培训?九名呼吸科临床医生参加了为期一天的动机性访谈工作坊,两周后进行了半结构化面对面访谈。所有访谈均进行了录音,逐字转录,并采用主题分析法进行分析。本文呈现了四个主要主题——1)动机性访谈在呼吸领域的适用性:参与者认为使用动机性访谈来激励患者参与规定的呼吸干预措施,如增加体育活动,具有潜力。那些在工作坊后尝试新技能的人受到了患者反应和结果的鼓舞。2)动机性访谈与常规临床实践的关系:一些人认为他们已经在使用动机性访谈的某些要素,但大多数参与者认为动机性访谈与他们正常的工作方式“根本不同”。3)实施问题:需要额外的时间来进行适当深入的交谈。4)培训问题:参与者意识到动机性访谈的复杂性可能使其难以学习,他们需要时间才能胜任。持续监督被认为是必要的。确定的一个关键挑战是如何抑制与动机性访谈相悖的行为。这些发现支持了在诸如肺康复计划等呼吸领域使用动机性访谈的可行性,但也突出了需要克服的实施和培训问题。这些见解为另一项研究的开展提供了参考,该研究测试了针对提供肺康复计划的呼吸科临床医生的定制培训包对动机性访谈技能的影响。