Beck Kyongmin Sarah, Kim Jeong A, Choe Yeon Hyeon, Hian Sim Kui, Hoe John, Hong Yoo Jin, Kim Sung Mok, Kim Tae Hoon, Kim Young Jin, Kim Yun Hyeon, Kuribayashi Sachio, Lee Jongmin, Leong Lilian, Lim Tae-Hwan, Lu Bin, Park Jae Hyung, Sakuma Hajime, Yang Dong Hyun, Yaw Tan Swee, Wan Yung-Liang, Zhang Zhaoqi, Zhao Shihua, Yong Hwan Seok
Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.
Department of Radiology, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang 10380, Korea.
Korean J Radiol. 2017 Nov-Dec;18(6):871-880. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.6.871. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
In 2010, the Asian Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASCI) provided recommendations for cardiac CT and MRI, and this document reflects an update of the 2010 ASCI appropriate use criteria (AUC). In 2016, the ASCI formed a new working group for revision of AUC for noninvasive cardiac imaging. A major change that we made in this document is the rating of various noninvasive tests (exercise electrocardiogram, echocardiography, positron emission tomography, single-photon emission computed tomography, radionuclide imaging, cardiac magnetic resonance, and cardiac computed tomography/angiography), compared side by side for their applications in various clinical scenarios. Ninety-five clinical scenarios were developed from eight selected pre-existing guidelines and classified into four sections as follows: 1) detection of coronary artery disease, symptomatic or asymptomatic; 2) cardiac evaluation in various clinical scenarios; 3) use of imaging modality according to prior testing; and 4) evaluation of cardiac structure and function. The clinical scenarios were scored by a separate rating committee on a scale of 1-9 to designate appropriate use, uncertain use, or inappropriate use according to a modified Delphi method. Overall, the AUC ratings for CT were higher than those of previous guidelines. These new AUC provide guidance for clinicians choosing among available testing modalities for various cardiac diseases and are also unique, given that most previous AUC for noninvasive imaging include only one imaging technique. As cardiac imaging is multimodal in nature, we believe that these AUC will be more useful for clinical decision making.
2010年,亚洲心血管影像学会(ASCI)发布了心脏CT和MRI的相关建议,本文献反映了2010年ASCI适用标准(AUC)的更新。2016年,ASCI成立了一个新的工作组,对无创心脏成像的AUC进行修订。我们在本文献中做出的一个主要改变是对各种无创检查(运动心电图、超声心动图、正电子发射断层扫描、单光子发射计算机断层扫描、放射性核素成像、心脏磁共振以及心脏计算机断层扫描/血管造影)进行评级,并将它们在各种临床场景中的应用进行对比。从八个已有的指南中选取了95个临床场景,并将其分为以下四个部分:1)有症状或无症状冠状动脉疾病的检测;2)各种临床场景下的心脏评估;3)根据先前检查结果选择成像方式;4)心脏结构和功能的评估。临床场景由一个单独的评级委员会根据改良的德尔菲法,按照1 - 9分的标准进行评分,以确定其使用是否恰当、不确定或不恰当。总体而言,CT的AUC评级高于先前的指南。这些新的AUC为临床医生在各种心脏疾病的现有检查方式中进行选择提供了指导,而且鉴于之前大多数无创成像的AUC仅包含一种成像技术,所以这些新的AUC也具有独特性。由于心脏成像本质上是多模态的,我们相信这些AUC对临床决策将更有帮助。