• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉瓣置换术中有效瓣口面积的决定因素:解剖学和临床因素

Determinants of effective orifice area in aortic valve replacement: anatomic and clinical factors.

作者信息

Kim Hee Jung, Park Sung Jun, Koo Hyun Jung, Kang Joon-Won, Yang Dong Hyun, Jung Sung-Ho, Choo Suk Jung, Chung Cheol Hyun, Lee Jae Won, Kim Joon Bum

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2020 May;12(5):1942-1951. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-188.

DOI:10.21037/jtd-20-188
PMID:32642097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7330291/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Obtaining adequate effective orifice area (EOA) in surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is important to minimize pressure gradients across the prosthetic aortic valve (AV) and improve clinical outcomes. However, the predictors of EOA are unclear.

METHODS

From July 2011 to March 2016, patients undergoing SAVR who were preoperatively evaluated using a computed tomography (CT) on the aortic root were enrolled. Indexed EOA (iEOA) was used as an indicator of prosthetic AV opening area. The aortic root parameters investigated were the annular diameter (max and min), annular perimeter, annular area, and maximal dimensions of the proximal ascending aorta. These variables were evaluated as predictors of EOA, and an individual surgeon was incorporated in analysis for verifying surgeon dependent factors.

RESULTS

Among the 710 patients included in this study [age: 64.9±10.8 years; females: n=285 (40.1%)], 370 (52.1%) were implanted with bio-prosthesis. Mean prosthetic iEOA was 1.1±0.3 cm/m. Univariable linear regression analysis showed that all indexed aortic root parameters (maximal and minimal annular diameters, annular perimeter, annular area, and sinus dimensions) were significantly associated with iEOA (P<0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that indexed aortic annular area, indexed maximal diameter of the Valsalva sinus, female sex, and bio-prosthesis, supra-annular type prosthesis and surgeon were significant and independent determinants of iEOA (adjusted R=0.513, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic annular area and Valsalva sinus diameter are independent determinants for iEOA measured by preoperative CT; surgeon-dependent factors are also significant determinants in SAVR.

摘要

背景

在外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)中获得足够的有效瓣口面积(EOA)对于最小化人工主动脉瓣(AV)上的压力梯度并改善临床结果很重要。然而,EOA的预测因素尚不清楚。

方法

纳入2011年7月至2016年3月期间接受SAVR且术前对主动脉根部进行计算机断层扫描(CT)评估的患者。将指数化EOA(iEOA)用作人工AV开口面积的指标。研究的主动脉根部参数包括环直径(最大和最小)、环周长、环面积以及升主动脉近端的最大尺寸。将这些变量作为EOA的预测因素进行评估,并纳入一名个体外科医生进行分析以验证与外科医生相关的因素。

结果

在本研究纳入的710例患者中[年龄:64.9±10.8岁;女性:n = 285例(40.1%)],370例(52.1%)植入了生物假体。人工iEOA的平均值为1.1±0.3 cm/m²。单变量线性回归分析表明,所有指数化的主动脉根部参数(最大和最小环直径、环周长、环面积以及窦部尺寸)均与iEOA显著相关(P<0.001)。多变量分析表明,指数化的主动脉环面积、指数化的主动脉窦最大直径、女性性别、生物假体、瓣上型假体和外科医生是iEOA的显著且独立的决定因素(调整R² = 0.513,P<0.001)。

结论

主动脉环面积和主动脉窦直径是术前CT测量iEOA的独立决定因素;在SAVR中,与外科医生相关的因素也是重要的决定因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85a2/7330291/ed7280bd6565/jtd-12-05-1942-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85a2/7330291/659568c141fc/jtd-12-05-1942-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85a2/7330291/8cf3ca74154b/jtd-12-05-1942-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85a2/7330291/ed7280bd6565/jtd-12-05-1942-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85a2/7330291/659568c141fc/jtd-12-05-1942-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85a2/7330291/8cf3ca74154b/jtd-12-05-1942-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85a2/7330291/ed7280bd6565/jtd-12-05-1942-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Determinants of effective orifice area in aortic valve replacement: anatomic and clinical factors.主动脉瓣置换术中有效瓣口面积的决定因素:解剖学和临床因素
J Thorac Dis. 2020 May;12(5):1942-1951. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-188.
2
Impact of valve size, predicted effective and indexed effective orifice area after aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后瓣膜大小、预测有效及指数化有效瓣口面积的影响
J Card Surg. 2021 Mar;36(3):961-968. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15311. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
3
Patient Prosthesis Mismatch After SAVR and TAVR.外科主动脉瓣置换术和经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的患者-人工瓣膜不匹配
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 30;9:761917. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.761917. eCollection 2022.
4
Assessing options for the small aortic root.评估小主动脉根部的治疗方案。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2002 Jan;11 Suppl 1:S50-5.
5
Multidetector CT predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.多排 CT 预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术后假体-患者不匹配。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2013 Jul-Aug;7(4):248-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
6
Stress exercise haemodynamic performance and opening reserve of a stented bovine pericardial aortic valve bioprosthesis.应激运动对带支架牛心包主动脉瓣生物假体的血液动力学性能和开口储备的影响。
J Card Surg. 2022 Mar;37(3):618-627. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16220. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
7
Feasibility, Accuracy, and Reproducibility of Aortic Annular and Root Sizing for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using Novel Automated Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Software: Comparison with Multi-Detector Row Computed Tomography.使用新型自动化三维超声心动图软件评估经导管主动脉瓣置换术主动脉瓣环和根部的可行性、准确性和可重复性:与多排螺旋 CT 的比较。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018 Apr;31(4):505-514.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
8
Computed Tomography-Based Indexed Aortic Annulus Size to Predict Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.基于计算机断层扫描的主动脉瓣环大小指数预测人工瓣膜-患者不匹配。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr;12(4):e007396. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007396.
9
Comprehensive Echocardiographic Assessment of Normal Transcatheter Valve Function.经导管正常瓣膜功能的综合超声心动图评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jan;12(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
10
Immediate Outcomes of Aortic Valve Neocuspidization with Glutaraldehyde-treated Autologous Pericardium: a Multicenter Study.经戊二醛处理的自体心包主动脉瓣新尖化的即刻结果:一项多中心研究。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Jun 1;35(3):241-248. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0019.

引用本文的文献

1
Aortic valve replacement in small aortic root- Bi-leaflet mechanical valve is superior to a Mono-leaflet mechanical valve.小主动脉根部的主动脉瓣置换术——双叶机械瓣优于单叶机械瓣。
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 May 20;39(5):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s12055-023-01520-9.
2
Reply: Prosthesis-patient mismatch: No consensus yet.回复:人工瓣膜-患者不匹配:尚无共识。
JTCVS Open. 2021 Jul 29;8:247-248. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.07.022. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Aortic annulus sizing in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves using CT in patients with surgical aortic valve replacement.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Suture Techniques for Aortic Valve Replacement on Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.主动脉瓣置换术缝线技术对人工瓣膜-患者不匹配的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Mar;109(3):661-667. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.012. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
2
Comparison of Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Prostheses: Size Matters.外科主动脉瓣假体与经导管主动脉瓣假体的比较:尺寸很重要。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 4;73(21):2784. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.475.
3
Supra-annular versus intra-annular prostheses in aortic valve replacement: impact on haemodynamics and clinical outcomes.
在接受外科主动脉瓣置换术的患者中,使用 CT 对二叶式主动脉瓣和三叶式主动脉瓣进行主动脉瓣环测量。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 25;11(1):21005. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00406-3.
主动脉瓣置换术中瓣环上与瓣环内人工瓣膜:对血流动力学和临床结局的影响。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Jan 1;28(1):58-64. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy190.
4
Functional classification of aortic regurgitation using cardiac computed tomography: comparison with surgical inspection.使用心脏计算机断层扫描对主动脉瓣反流进行功能分类:与手术检查的比较。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Aug;34(8):1295-1303. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1341-1. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
5
2017 Multimodality Appropriate Use Criteria for Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging: Expert Consensus of the Asian Society of Cardiovascular Imaging.2017年非侵入性心脏成像多模态适宜性标准:亚洲心血管影像学会专家共识
Korean J Radiol. 2017 Nov-Dec;18(6):871-880. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.6.871. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
6
2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会对2014年《美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南》的重点更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jul 11;70(2):252-289. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
7
Predictors and Outcomes of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后人工瓣膜-患者不匹配的预测因素和结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Aug;9(8):924-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.10.026. Epub 2016 May 25.
8
Sutureless Versus Stented Valve in Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Small Annulus.小瓣环患者主动脉瓣置换术中无支架瓣膜与带支架瓣膜的比较
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jul;102(1):118-22. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
9
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement: Effect on Long-Term Survival.主动脉瓣置换术后人工瓣膜-患者不匹配:对长期生存的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Apr;101(4):1388-94. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.048. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
10
Sutureless Aortic Valve Prosthesis Sizing: Estimation and Prediction Using Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography.无缝合主动脉瓣假体尺寸测量:使用多排探测器计算机断层扫描进行估计和预测
Innovations (Phila). 2015 Jul-Aug;10(4):230-5; discussion 235. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000182.