Kredel Ralf, Vater Christian, Klostermann André, Hossner Ernst-Joachim
Movement Science, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 17;8:1845. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01845. eCollection 2017.
Reviewing 60 studies on natural gaze behavior in sports, it becomes clear that, over the last 40 years, the use of eye-tracking devices has considerably increased. Specifically, this review reveals the large variance of methods applied, analyses performed, and measures derived within the field. The results of sub-sample analyses suggest that sports-related eye-tracking research strives, on the one hand, for ecologically valid test settings (i.e., viewing conditions and response modes), while on the other, for experimental control along with high measurement accuracy (i.e., controlled test conditions with high-frequency eye-trackers linked to algorithmic analyses). To meet both demands, some promising compromises of methodological solutions have been proposed-in particular, the integration of robust mobile eye-trackers in motion-capture systems. However, as the fundamental trade-off between laboratory and field research cannot be solved by technological means, researchers need to carefully weigh the arguments for one or the other approach by accounting for the respective consequences. Nevertheless, for future research on dynamic gaze behavior in sports, further development of the current mobile eye-tracking methodology seems highly advisable to allow for the acquisition and algorithmic analyses of larger amounts of gaze-data and further, to increase the explanatory power of the derived results.
回顾60项关于运动中自然注视行为的研究后可以清楚地看到,在过去40年里,眼动追踪设备的使用显著增加。具体而言,本次综述揭示了该领域内所应用的方法、进行的分析以及得出的测量结果存在很大差异。子样本分析结果表明,与运动相关的眼动追踪研究一方面力求实现生态有效的测试环境(即观看条件和反应模式),另一方面力求实现实验控制以及高测量精度(即使用与算法分析相连的高频眼动追踪仪的受控测试条件)。为了满足这两个需求,已经提出了一些有前景的方法学解决方案折衷方案,特别是将坚固的移动眼动追踪仪集成到动作捕捉系统中。然而,由于实验室研究和实地研究之间的基本权衡无法通过技术手段解决,研究人员需要通过考虑各自的后果来仔细权衡支持一种或另一种方法的论据。尽管如此,对于未来关于运动中动态注视行为的研究,进一步发展当前的移动眼动追踪方法似乎非常可取,以便能够获取和进行大量注视数据的算法分析,并进一步提高所得结果的解释力。