Kathuria Hasmeena, Detterbeck Frank C, Fathi Joelle T, Fennig Kathleen, Gould Michael K, Jolicoeur Denise G, Land Stephanie R, Massetti Greta M, Mazzone Peter J, Silvestri Gerard A, Slatore Christopher G, Smith Robert A, Vachani Anil, Zeliadt Steven B, Wiener Renda Soylemez
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov 1;196(9):1202-1212. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201709-1858ST.
Smoking cessation counseling in conjunction with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening is recommended in multiple clinical practice guidelines. The best approach for integrating effective smoking cessation interventions within this setting is unknown.
To summarize evidence, identify research gaps, prioritize topics for future research, and propose standardized tools for use in conducting research on smoking cessation interventions within the LDCT lung cancer screening setting.
The American Thoracic Society convened a multistakeholder committee with expertise in tobacco dependence treatment and/or LDCT screening. During an in-person meeting, evidence was reviewed, research gaps were identified, and key questions were generated for each of three research domains: (1) target population to study; (2) adaptation, development, and testing of interventions; and (3) implementation of interventions with demonstrated efficacy. We also identified standardized measures for use in conducting this research. A larger stakeholder panel then ranked research questions by perceived importance in an online survey. Final prioritization was generated hierarchically on the basis of average rank assigned.
There was little consensus on which questions within the population domain were of highest priority. Within the intervention domain, research to evaluate the effectiveness in the lung cancer screening setting of evidence-based smoking cessation interventions shown to be effective in other contexts was ranked highest. In the implementation domain, stakeholders prioritized understanding strategies to identify and overcome barriers to integrating smoking cessation in lung cancer screening settings.
This statement offers an agenda to stimulate research surrounding the integration and implementation of smoking cessation interventions with LDCT lung cancer screening.
多项临床实践指南推荐在低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)肺癌筛查的同时提供戒烟咨询。在此背景下整合有效戒烟干预措施的最佳方法尚不清楚。
总结证据,识别研究差距,确定未来研究的优先主题,并提出用于在LDCT肺癌筛查背景下开展戒烟干预措施研究的标准化工具。
美国胸科学会召集了一个由烟草依赖治疗和/或LDCT筛查领域专家组成的多利益相关方委员会。在一次面对面会议期间,对证据进行了审查,识别了研究差距,并针对三个研究领域中的每一个提出了关键问题:(1)研究的目标人群;(2)干预措施的调整、开发和测试;(3)已证明有效的干预措施的实施。我们还确定了用于开展此项研究的标准化措施。随后,一个更大的利益相关方小组在一项在线调查中根据感知的重要性对研究问题进行了排序。最终的优先排序是根据所分配的平均排名分层生成的。
在人群领域内哪些问题最为优先,几乎没有达成共识。在干预领域,评估在其他背景下已证明有效的循证戒烟干预措施在肺癌筛查背景下的有效性的研究排名最高。在实施领域,利益相关方将了解识别和克服肺癌筛查环境中戒烟整合障碍的策略列为优先事项。
本声明提供了一个议程,以推动围绕戒烟干预措施与LDCT肺癌筛查的整合与实施的研究。