• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以患者为中心、基于注册的姑息治疗学习型健康系统:实现更好的结局、体验、价值和科学的共创路径。

A Person-Centered, Registry-Based Learning Health System for Palliative Care: A Path to Coproducing Better Outcomes, Experience, Value, and Science.

机构信息

1 Duke Cancer Institute and the Fuqua School of Business, Duke University , Durham, North Carolina.

2 Dartmouth Hitchcock Health and The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice , Lebanon , New Hampshire.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;21(S2):S61-S67. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0354. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2017.0354
PMID:29091509
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5756463/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Palliative care offers an approach to the care of people with serious illness that focuses on quality of life and aligning care with individual and family goals, and values in the context of what is medically achievable.

OBJECTIVE

Measurement of the impact of palliative care is critical for determining what works for which patients in what settings, to learn, improve care, and ensure access to high value care for people with serious illness.

METHODS

A learning health system that includes patients and families partnering with clinicians and care teams, is directly linked to a registry to support networks for improvement and research, and offers an ideal framework for measuring what matters to a range of stakeholders interested in improving care for this population.

MEASUREMENTS

Measurement focuses on the individual patient and family experience as the fundamental outcome of interest around which all care delivery is organized.

RESULTS

We describe an approach to codesigning and implementing a palliative care registry that functions as a learning health system, by combining patient and family inputs and clinical data to support person-centered care, quality improvement, accountability, transparency, and scientific research.

DISCUSSION

The potential for a palliative care learning health system that, by design, brings together enriched information environments to support coproduction of healthcare and facilitated peer networks to support patients and families, collaborative clinician networks to support palliative care program improvement, and collaboratories to support research and the application of research to benefit individual patients is immense.

摘要

背景

姑息治疗为患有严重疾病的患者提供了一种关注生活质量的护理方法,使护理与个人和家庭目标以及在医学可实现范围内的价值观保持一致。

目的

姑息治疗效果的衡量对于确定哪些患者在哪些环境中适合哪种治疗方法至关重要,这样可以学习、改善护理,并确保为患有严重疾病的人提供高价值的护理。

方法

一个包含患者和家属与临床医生和护理团队合作的学习型医疗系统,与一个支持改进和研究网络的登记处直接相关,并为衡量一系列对改善该人群护理感兴趣的利益相关者的重要事项提供了理想的框架。

测量

测量重点是个体患者和家庭的体验,作为所有护理服务组织的基本关注结果。

结果

我们描述了一种联合设计和实施姑息治疗登记处的方法,该方法作为一个学习型医疗系统,通过结合患者和家属的投入以及临床数据,支持以患者为中心的护理、质量改进、问责制、透明度和科学研究。

讨论

一个姑息治疗学习型医疗系统的潜力是巨大的,通过设计,该系统将丰富的信息环境结合起来,以支持医疗保健的共同创造,并为患者和家属提供便利的同行网络,支持姑息治疗项目的改进,以及合作实验室,以支持研究和将研究应用于造福个体患者。

相似文献

1
A Person-Centered, Registry-Based Learning Health System for Palliative Care: A Path to Coproducing Better Outcomes, Experience, Value, and Science.以患者为中心、基于注册的姑息治疗学习型健康系统:实现更好的结局、体验、价值和科学的共创路径。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;21(S2):S61-S67. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0354. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
2
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
3
The National Palliative Care Research Center and the Center to Advance Palliative Care: a partnership to improve care for persons with serious illness and their families.国家姑息治疗研究中心与推进姑息治疗中心:改善重症患者及其家庭护理的合作伙伴关系。
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011 Oct;33 Suppl 2:S126-31. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e318230dfa0.
4
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
5
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
6
Earlier identification of seriously ill patients: an implementation case series. 早期识别重病患者:实施案例系列。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Dec;10(4):e31. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001789. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
7
Comparative Clinical Effectiveness Research Focused on Community-Based Delivery of Palliative Care: Overview of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's Funding Initiative.以社区为基础的姑息治疗服务为重点的临床效果比较研究:患者为中心的结局研究学会资助倡议概述。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;22(S1):2-6. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0370.
8
Palliative care in the pediatric ICU: challenges and opportunities for family-centered practice.儿科重症监护病房中的姑息治疗:以家庭为中心实践的挑战与机遇
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2012;8(4):297-315. doi: 10.1080/15524256.2012.732461.
9
Collaborative networks for both improvement and research.合作网络,用于改进和研究。
Pediatrics. 2013 Jun;131 Suppl 4:S210-4. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3786H.
10
A qualitative analysis of patient and family perspectives of palliative care.对患者及家属姑息治疗观点的定性分析。
J Palliat Med. 2015 Mar;18(3):282-5. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0155. Epub 2014 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Moving from a registry to a learning health system: A case study of a Dutch prostate cancer registry.从登记系统迈向学习型健康系统:荷兰前列腺癌登记系统的案例研究
Learn Health Syst. 2025 Jan 16;9(3):e10476. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10476. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Using Focus Groups to Evaluate a Self-Assessment Approach to Coproduction Value Creation in an International Community of Practice: Phase 2 of the CO-VALUE Study.运用焦点小组评估国际实践社区中共同生产价值创造的自我评估方法:CO-VALUE研究的第二阶段
Perm J. 2024 Sep 16;28(3):278-283. doi: 10.7812/TPP/24.009. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
3
Towards a shared understanding of the learning health system in a large academic-based health system: A qualitative analysis.迈向对大型学术型医疗系统中学习型健康系统的共同理解:一项定性分析。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2025 Feb;38(1):22-30. doi: 10.1177/09514848241254928. Epub 2024 May 15.
4
The speech neuroprosthesis.言语神经假体。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2024 Jul;25(7):473-492. doi: 10.1038/s41583-024-00819-9. Epub 2024 May 14.
5
Conceptualizing learning health systems: A mapping review.学习型健康系统的概念化:一项映射综述。
Learn Health Syst. 2022 Jun 2;7(1):e10311. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10311. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
Prioritizing Measures That Matter Within a Person-Centered Oncology Learning Health System.在以患者为中心的肿瘤学学习健康系统中优先考虑重要措施。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2022 May 2;6(3). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkac037.
7
Psychometric assessment of the consideRATE questions, a new measure of serious illness experience, with an online simulation study.考虑量表(consideRATE)问卷的心理测量评估:一种新的严重疾病体验测量方法,结合在线模拟研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2581-2589. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.01.002. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
8
The role of co-production in Learning Health Systems.共同生产在学习型健康系统中的作用。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Nov 29;33(Supplement_2):ii26-ii32. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab072.
9
Aiming for quality: a global compass for national learning systems.追求质量:国家学习体系的全球指南。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Jul 19;19(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00746-6.
10
The work of having a chronic condition: development and psychometric evaluation of the distribution of co-care activities (DoCCA) scale.患有慢性病的工作:共同照护活动分配量表(DoCCA 量表)的编制和心理计量学评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 20;21(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06455-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Creating a culture of health: evolving healthcare systems and patient engagement.营造健康文化:不断发展的医疗体系与患者参与度
QJM. 2017 Mar 1;110(3):125-129. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcw188.
2
MACRAeconomics: Physician incentives and behavioral economics in the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act.《医疗保险获取与儿童健康保险计划再授权法案》中的MACRA经济学:医生激励措施与行为经济学
Healthc (Amst). 2017 Sep;5(3):150-152. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
3
Patient focused registries can improve health, care, and science.以患者为中心的注册系统可以改善健康、医疗和科学。
BMJ. 2016 Jul 1;354:i3319. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3319.
4
Coproduction of healthcare service.医疗服务的共同生产
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):509-17. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004315. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
5
The Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register: optimisation of rheumatic disease assessments using register-enriched data.瑞典风湿病质量登记册:利用登记册丰富的数据优化风湿病评估
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014 Sep-Oct;32(5 Suppl 85):S-147-9. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
6
Accelerating implementation of biomedical research advances: critical elements of a successful 10 year Cystic Fibrosis Foundation healthcare delivery improvement initiative.加速生物医学研究进展的实施:囊性纤维化基金会成功的 10 年医疗保健提供改进计划的关键要素。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Apr;23 Suppl 1:i95-i103. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002790.
7
The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry as a tool for use in quality improvement.囊性纤维化基金会患者登记处作为质量改进的工具。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Apr;23 Suppl 1:i9-14. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002378. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
8
Collaborative Chronic Care Networks (C3Ns) to transform chronic illness care.协作性慢性病照护网络(C3Ns)改变慢性病照护模式。
Pediatrics. 2013 Jun;131 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S219-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3786J.
9
Improved outcomes in a quality improvement collaborative for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.质量改进合作改善小儿炎症性肠病的结局。
Pediatrics. 2012 Apr;129(4):e1030-41. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1700. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
10
Goal-oriented patient care--an alternative health outcomes paradigm.以目标为导向的患者护理——一种替代性的健康结果范式。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):777-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1113631.