• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经脊柱介入学会召集的多学科协作会制定的用于透视引导下诊断性和治疗性骶髂关节介入的适宜性标准:多学科协作研究结果。

Appropriate Use Criteria for Fluoroscopically Guided Diagnostic and Therapeutic Sacroiliac Interventions: Results from the Spine Intervention Society Convened Multispecialty Collaborative.

机构信息

Southern Rehab, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Ahwatukee Sports and Spine, Phoenix, Arizona.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2017 Nov 1;18(11):2081-2095. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx253.

DOI:10.1093/pm/pnx253
PMID:29092085
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of a multisociety effort to formulate appropriate use criteria for image-guided injections and radiofrequency procedures in the diagnosis and treatment of sacroiliac joint and posterior sacroiliac complex pain.

METHODS

The Spine Intervention Society convened a multisociety effort to guide physicians and define for payers the appropriate use of image-guided injections and radiofrequency procedures. An evidence panel was established to write systematic reviews, define key terms and assumptions, and develop clinical scenarios to be addressed. The rating panel considered the evidence presented in the systematic reviews, carefully reviewed the definitions and assumptions, and rated the clinical scenarios. Final median ratings, in combination with the level of agreement, determined the final ratings for the appropriate use of sacroiliac injections and radiofrequency neurotomy.

RESULTS

More than 10,000 scenarios were addressed in the appropriate use criteria and are housed within five modules in the portal, available on the Spine Intervention Society website: Module 1: Clinical Indications and Imaging; Module 2: Anticoagulants; Module 3: Timing of Injections; Module 4: Number of Injections; and Module 5: Lateral Branch Radiofrequency Neurotomy. Within several of these modules, several issues of interest are identified and discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians and payers can access the appropriate use criteria portal on the Spine Intervention Society's website and select specific clinical indications for a particular patient in order to learn more about the appropriateness of the intervention(s) under consideration.

摘要

目的

概述多学会努力制定适当的使用标准,用于影像引导注射和射频程序,以诊断和治疗骶髂关节和骶髂后复合体疼痛。

方法

脊柱介入学会召集了多学会努力,指导医生并为支付者定义影像引导注射和射频程序的适当使用。建立了一个证据小组,以撰写系统评价,定义关键术语和假设,并开发要解决的临床情况。评级小组考虑了系统评价中提出的证据,仔细审查了定义和假设,并对临床情况进行了评分。最终中位数评分,结合一致性水平,确定了骶髂关节注射和射频神经切断术适当使用的最终评分。

结果

在适当使用标准中解决了 10000 多个情况,并在五个模块中进行了分类,可在脊柱介入学会网站的门户中访问:模块 1:临床适应症和影像学;模块 2:抗凝剂;模块 3:注射时间;模块 4:注射次数;模块 5:侧支射频神经切断术。在这些模块中的几个模块中,确定并讨论了几个感兴趣的问题。

结论

医生和支付者可以访问脊柱介入学会网站上的适当使用标准门户,并为特定患者选择特定的临床适应症,以了解正在考虑的干预措施的适当性。

相似文献

1
Appropriate Use Criteria for Fluoroscopically Guided Diagnostic and Therapeutic Sacroiliac Interventions: Results from the Spine Intervention Society Convened Multispecialty Collaborative.经脊柱介入学会召集的多学科协作会制定的用于透视引导下诊断性和治疗性骶髂关节介入的适宜性标准:多学科协作研究结果。
Pain Med. 2017 Nov 1;18(11):2081-2095. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx253.
2
Fluoroscopically Guided Diagnostic and Therapeutic Intra-Articular Sacroiliac Joint Injections: A Systematic Review.透视引导下诊断性和治疗性骶髂关节腔内注射:一项系统评价
Pain Med. 2015 Aug;16(8):1500-18. doi: 10.1111/pme.12833. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
3
A Retrospective Analysis of Sacroiliac Joint Pain Interventions: Intraarticular Steroid Injection and Lateral Branch Radiofrequency Neurotomy.骶髂关节疼痛干预措施的回顾性分析:关节内注射类固醇与外侧支射频神经切断术
Pain Physician. 2022 Mar;25(2):E341-E347.
4
A systematic evaluation of the therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions.对骶髂关节介入治疗的疗效进行系统评价。
Pain Physician. 2012 May-Jun;15(3):E247-78.
5
Diagnosis and treatment of posterior sacroiliac complex pain: a systematic review with comprehensive analysis of the published data.骶髂关节后复合体疼痛的诊断与治疗:对已发表数据进行综合分析的系统评价
Pain Med. 2015 Feb;16(2):257-65. doi: 10.1111/pme.12630.
6
Sensory stimulation-guided sacroiliac joint radiofrequency neurotomy: technique based on neuroanatomy of the dorsal sacral plexus.感觉刺激引导下的骶髂关节射频神经切断术:基于骶神经后丛神经解剖学的技术
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 15;28(20):2419-25. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000085360.03758.C3.
7
Sacroiliac joint interventions: a systematic review.骶髂关节干预措施:一项系统评价
Pain Physician. 2007 Jan;10(1):165-84.
8
Evaluation of sacroiliac joint interventions: a systematic appraisal of the literature.骶髂关节干预措施的评估:文献的系统评价
Pain Physician. 2009 Mar-Apr;12(2):399-418.
9
Fluoroscopically guided therapeutic sacroiliac joint injections for sacroiliac joint syndrome.荧光镜引导下治疗性骶髂关节注射治疗骶髂关节综合征
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Jun;80(6):425-32. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200106000-00007.
10
Sacroiliac Joint Interventions.骶髂关节干预措施
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2018 Feb;29(1):171-183. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2017.09.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of technical adequacy of sacral lateral branches cooled radiofrequency neurotomy.骶外侧支冷却射频神经切断术技术充分性评估
Interv Pain Med. 2022 Feb 17;1(1):100069. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100069. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
A New Approach to the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain and First Patient-Reported Outcomes Using a Novel Arthrodesis Technique for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.一种治疗骶髂关节疼痛的新方法及首例使用新型骶髂关节融合关节固定技术的患者报告结局
Orthop Res Rev. 2024 Feb 1;16:43-57. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S434566. eCollection 2024.
3
Treating refractory posterior sacroiliac joint complex pain in the current healthcare ecosystem: a call to action.
在当前医疗生态系统中治疗难治性骶髂关节复合体疼痛:行动呼吁。
Pain Med. 2023 Oct 3;24(10):1131-1132. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnad071.
4
Minimally Invasive and Conservative Interventions for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Review of Recent Literature.骶髂关节疼痛治疗的微创及保守干预:近期文献综述
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022 May 31;14(4):34098. doi: 10.52965/001c.34098. eCollection 2022.
5
Nonoperative Treatment Options for Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Pain.骶髂关节疼痛患者的非手术治疗选择
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Feb 10;14(Suppl 1):35-40. doi: 10.14444/6082. eCollection 2020 Feb.