Luna Beatriz
Professor of Psychiatry and Psychology, and Director of the Laboratory of Neurocognitive Development at the Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic and the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
Hastings Law J. 2012 Aug;63(6):1469-1486.
The overreaching aim of this Article is to describe how developmental cognitive neuroscience can inform juvenile law. Fundamental to culpability and responsibility is the ability to effectively execute voluntary executive behavior. Executive function, including cognitive control and working memory, has a protracted development with key aspects continuing to mature through adolescence. These limitations in executive control are due in great part to still maturing brain processes. Gray and white matter changes are still becoming established in adolescence, enhancing efficiency and the speed of brain processing supporting executive control. Dopamine, a neurotransmitter that underlies reward processing and learning, peaks in adolescence-supporting known increases in sensation seeking but also in adaptable learning. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging ("fMRI") studies show that adolescent limitations in recruiting brain systems that support response planning, error processing, the ability to sustain an executive state, and top-down prefrontal executive control of behavior underlie limitations in executive control in adolescence. Moreover, adolescents show over-reactivity to reward incentives, thus engaging response systems that may contribute to impulsive responses in situations with high motivation. Neurobiological evidence indicating that adolescence is a transitional stage of limited executive control in the context of increased vulnerability to sensation seeking can inform culpability, long-term sentencing, and greater amenability for rehabilitation. Finally, it is important to note that executive control, while limited in its efficiency, is available in adolescence, and given time to deliberate with guidance from mature adults, adolescents can make responsible decisions.
本文的总体目标是描述发展认知神经科学如何为青少年法律提供信息。罪责和责任的基础是有效执行自愿执行行为的能力。执行功能,包括认知控制和工作记忆,有一个漫长的发展过程,其关键方面在整个青春期持续成熟。执行控制方面的这些限制在很大程度上归因于大脑过程仍在成熟。灰质和白质的变化在青春期仍在形成,提高了支持执行控制的大脑处理效率和速度。多巴胺是一种作为奖励处理和学习基础的神经递质,在青春期达到峰值,这既支持了已知的寻求刺激行为的增加,也支持了适应性学习。功能磁共振成像(“fMRI”)研究表明,青少年在调动支持反应计划、错误处理、维持执行状态的能力以及对行为进行自上而下的前额叶执行控制的大脑系统方面存在局限性,这是青少年执行控制受限的基础。此外,青少年对奖励激励表现出过度反应,从而激活了可能导致在高动机情境中产生冲动反应的反应系统。神经生物学证据表明,在对寻求刺激的易感性增加的背景下,青春期是执行控制有限的过渡阶段,这可以为罪责、长期量刑以及更强的康复适应性提供信息。最后,需要指出的是,执行控制虽然效率有限,但在青春期是存在的,并且在成熟成年人的指导下有时间进行深思熟虑时,青少年能够做出负责任的决定。