• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

论阅读难度与走神之间的关系:基于章节长度的阐述

On the relation between reading difficulty and mind-wandering: a section-length account.

作者信息

Forrin Noah D, Risko Evan F, Smilek Daniel

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2019 Apr;83(3):485-497. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0936-9. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-017-0936-9
PMID:29094259
Abstract

In many situations, increasing task difficulty decreases thoughts that are unrelated to the task (i.e., mind-wandering). In the context of reading, however, recent research demonstrated that increasing passage reading difficulty actually increases mind-wandering rates (e.g., Feng et al. in Psychon Bull Rev 20:586-592, 2013). The primary goal of this research was to elucidate the mechanism that drives this positive relation. Across Experiments 1-3, we found evidence that the effect of Flesch-Kincaid reading difficulty on mind-wandering is partially driven by hard passages having longer sections of text (i.e., more words per screen) than easy passages when passages are presented one sentence at a time. In Experiment 4, we controlled for reading difficulty, and found that section length was positively associated with mind-wandering rates. We conclude by proposing that individuals may tend to disengage their attention from passages with relatively long sections of text because they appear to be more demanding than passages with shorter sections (even though objective task demands are equivalent).

摘要

在许多情况下,增加任务难度会减少与任务无关的思维活动(即走神)。然而,在阅读情境中,最近的研究表明,增加文章阅读难度实际上会提高走神率(例如,Feng等人,《心理通报与评论》,2013年,第20卷,第586 - 592页)。本研究的主要目的是阐明驱动这种正相关关系的机制。在实验1 - 3中,我们发现有证据表明,当每次逐句呈现文章时,弗莱什 - 金凯德阅读难度对走神的影响部分是由难文章比易文章有更长的文本段落(即每屏更多单词)所驱动的。在实验4中,我们控制了阅读难度,发现段落长度与走神率呈正相关。我们的结论是,个体可能倾向于将注意力从文本段落相对较长的文章上转移,因为它们似乎比段落较短的文章要求更高(尽管客观任务要求是相同的)。

相似文献

1
On the relation between reading difficulty and mind-wandering: a section-length account.论阅读难度与走神之间的关系:基于章节长度的阐述
Psychol Res. 2019 Apr;83(3):485-497. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0936-9. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
2
In the eye of the beholder: Evaluative context modulates mind-wandering.旁观者眼中的看法:评价性情境会调节走神。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Apr;185:172-179. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
3
Mind wandering in sentence reading: decoupling the link between mind and eye.句子阅读中的思维游荡:解开思维与眼睛之间的联系。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2013 Mar;67(1):51-59. doi: 10.1037/a0030217.
4
Mind wandering while reading easy and difficult texts.阅读简单和困难文本时的走神。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun;20(3):586-92. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0367-y.
5
Cognitive coupling during reading.阅读过程中的认知耦合。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Jun;146(6):872-883. doi: 10.1037/xge0000309. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
6
Influencing the occurrence of mind wandering while reading.影响阅读时走神现象的发生。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Jul;34:52-62. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
7
Re-reading after mind wandering.走神后重新阅读。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2017 Sep;71(3):203-211. doi: 10.1037/cep0000123. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
8
The nature of mind wandering during reading varies with the cognitive control demands of the reading strategy.阅读时思维漫游的本质取决于阅读策略的认知控制需求。
Brain Res. 2013 Nov 20;1539:48-60. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.09.047. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
9
Can I get me out of my head? Exploring strategies for controlling the self-referential aspects of the mind-wandering state during reading.我能摆脱自己的思绪吗?探索在阅读过程中控制走神状态下自我指涉方面的策略。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Jun;70(6):1053-1062. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1216573. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
10
Window to the wandering mind: pupillometry of spontaneous thought while reading.漫游思绪之窗:阅读时自发思维的瞳孔测量法
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(12):2289-94. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.858170. Epub 2013 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Demotivated, but still attentive: Text disfluency does not affect mind-wandering and reading comprehension, but reduces motivation.动力不足,但仍保持专注:文本不流畅不会影响走神和阅读理解,但会降低动力。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02735-0.
2
The benefits of mind wandering on a naturalistic prospective memory task.心流状态对自然主义前瞻记忆任务的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 15;13(1):11432. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37996-z.
3
The relationship between mind wandering and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis.心流与阅读理解的关系:元分析。

本文引用的文献

1
In the eye of the beholder: Evaluative context modulates mind-wandering.旁观者眼中的看法:评价性情境会调节走神。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Apr;185:172-179. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
2
Studying in the region of proximal learning reduces mind wandering.在近端学习区域进行学习可减少走神。
Mem Cognit. 2016 Jul;44(5):681-95. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0589-8.
3
An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance.主观努力与任务绩效的机会成本模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Feb;30(1):40-59. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02141-w. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
4
Mind wandering increases linearly with text difficulty.思维漫游随文本难度呈线性增加。
Psychol Res. 2022 Feb;86(1):284-293. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01483-9. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
5
A National Survey on Patient Provider Agreements When Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain.一项关于在开具慢性疼痛阿片类药物时患者与提供者达成协议的全国性调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(3):600-605. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06364-2. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
6
Reconsidering the Mind-Wandering Reader: Predictive Processing, Probability Designs, and Enculturation.重新审视心不在焉的读者:预测性处理、概率设计与文化适应
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 8;9:2648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02648. eCollection 2018.
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Dec;36(6):661-79. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12003196.
4
In pursuit of off-task thought: mind wandering-performance trade-offs while reading aloud and color naming.追求脱轨思维:朗读和颜色命名时的思维漫游与表现权衡。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 18;4:360. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00360. eCollection 2013.
5
Construction, integration, and mind wandering in reading.阅读中的建构、整合与走神
Can J Exp Psychol. 2013 Mar;67(1):1-10. doi: 10.1037/a0031234. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
6
Mind wandering while reading easy and difficult texts.阅读简单和困难文本时的走神。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun;20(3):586-92. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0367-y.
7
Mind wandering and reading comprehension: examining the roles of working memory capacity, interest, motivation, and topic experience.心流与阅读理解:考察工作记忆容量、兴趣、动机和主题经验的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):832-842. doi: 10.1037/a0029669. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
8
Aging and mind wandering during text comprehension.文本理解过程中的衰老与思维漫游。
Psychol Aging. 2012 Dec;27(4):951-958. doi: 10.1037/a0028831. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
9
A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing.关于实用贝叶斯替代零假设检验的教程。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Sep;43(3):679-90. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5.
10
Harnessing the wandering mind: the role of perceptual load.驾驭走神的思维:知觉负载的作用
Cognition. 2009 Jun;111(3):345-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.006. Epub 2009 Mar 26.