• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期癌症接受姑息治疗患者的决策控制偏好。

Decisional control preferences of patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care.

机构信息

Department of Palliative Medicine,Centre Hospitalier de Lyon-Sud,Hospices Civils de Lyon,Pierre-Bénite,France.

Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,Houston,Texas,USA.

出版信息

Palliat Support Care. 2018 Oct;16(5):544-551. doi: 10.1017/S1478951517000803. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1017/S1478951517000803
PMID:29094668
Abstract

UNLABELLED

ABSTRACTObjective:Understanding patients' decisional control preferences (DCPs) is important to improving the quality of care and the satisfaction of patients who have advanced cancer with their care. In addition to passive decisional control (i.e., the patient prefers his/her doctor or family caregiver to make a decision on their behalf) and active decisional control (i.e., the patient decides alone), shared decisional control, where patients and caregivers decide together, could be more appropriate. The primary aim of our study was to describe the decision-making process and the DCPs of patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care in France.

METHOD

We conducted a prospective survey with advanced cancer patients referred to a palliative care team in an outpatient setting. We collected information about patients' demographic and clinical characteristics using the Decision Control Preference Scale, the Satisfaction with the Decisions and Care questionnaire, and the Understanding of Illness questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients were evaluable. The median age was 63.5 years and 53.5% female. The cancers most commonly represented were gastrointestinal and breast. A total of 72 patients (36.2%) preferred active decisional control, 52 (26.1%) preferred shared decisional control, and 75 (37.7%) preferred passive decisional control. Younger age (p = 0.003), higher education (p < 0.001), and employment status (p = 0.046) were found to be associated with active or shared DCPs. Some 82% of patients were satisfied with the decision-making process, 35% of whom expressed wishes that did not match the actual decision-making process. Only 23% of patients thought they could be cured of their illness, and 47% thought that their treatment would "get rid of " their disease.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

The decision-making processes are shared in the three models of DCPs in our cohort of French patients with advanced cancer. Further prospective studies are needed.

摘要

未加标签

摘要

目的

了解患者的决策控制偏好(DCP)对于提高接受姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者的护理质量和满意度非常重要。除了被动决策控制(即患者希望其医生或家庭照顾者代表他们做出决策)和主动决策控制(即患者独自做出决策)外,患者和照顾者共同做出决策的共享决策控制可能更为合适。我们研究的主要目的是描述法国接受姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者的决策过程和 DCP。

方法

我们对在门诊环境下接受姑息治疗团队治疗的晚期癌症患者进行了前瞻性调查。我们使用决策控制偏好量表、决策和护理满意度问卷以及疾病理解问卷收集了患者的人口统计学和临床特征信息。

结果

共 200 例患者可评估。中位年龄为 63.5 岁,53.5%为女性。最常见的癌症是胃肠道和乳腺癌。共有 72 例(36.2%)患者偏爱主动决策控制,52 例(26.1%)偏爱共享决策控制,75 例(37.7%)偏爱被动决策控制。年轻(p = 0.003)、高教育程度(p < 0.001)和就业状态(p = 0.046)与主动或共享 DCP 相关。82%的患者对决策过程感到满意,其中 35%的患者表达了与实际决策过程不符的意愿。只有 23%的患者认为自己可以治愈疾病,47%的患者认为自己的治疗可以“消除”疾病。

结果的意义

在我们的法国晚期癌症患者队列中,三种 DCP 模型的决策过程都是共享的。需要进一步的前瞻性研究。

相似文献

1
Decisional control preferences of patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care.晚期癌症接受姑息治疗患者的决策控制偏好。
Palliat Support Care. 2018 Oct;16(5):544-551. doi: 10.1017/S1478951517000803. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
2
Decisional control preferences, disclosure of information preferences, and satisfaction among Hispanic patients with advanced cancer.晚期癌症西班牙裔患者的决策控制偏好、信息披露偏好及满意度
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 May;47(5):896-905. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.06.010. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
3
Decisional control preferences among patients with advanced cancer: An international multicenter cross-sectional survey.晚期癌症患者的决策控制偏好:一项国际多中心横断面调查。
Palliat Med. 2018 Apr;32(4):870-880. doi: 10.1177/0269216317747442. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
4
Patient's Decisional Control Preferences of a Cohort of Patients With Advanced Cancer Receiving Palliative Care in India.印度接受姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者队列的患者决策控制偏好
J Palliat Care. 2019 Jul;34(3):175-180. doi: 10.1177/0825859719827316. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
5
Decisional control preferences of Hispanic patients with advanced cancer from the United States and Latin America.美国和拉丁美洲晚期癌症西班牙裔患者的决策控制偏好。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Sep;46(3):376-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.08.015. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
6
Decisional Control Preferences in the Hispanic Population in the Bronx.布朗克斯区西班牙裔人群的决策控制偏好
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Jun;34(3):472-477. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1325-9.
7
Decision-Making Preferences among Advanced Cancer Patients in a Palliative Setting in Jordan.约旦缓和医疗环境下晚期癌症患者的决策偏好。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 18;20(8):5550. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20085550.
8
Shared Decision Making in Health Care Visits for CKD: Patients' Decisional Role Preferences and Experiences.慢性肾脏病就诊中的共同决策:患者的决策角色偏好和体验。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2023 Dec;82(6):677-686. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.04.012. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
9
A multicenter survey of Hispanic caregiver preferences for patient decision control in the United States and Latin America.一项关于美国和拉丁美洲西班牙裔照顾者对患者决策控制偏好的多中心调查。
Palliat Med. 2013 Jul;27(7):692-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216313486953. Epub 2013 May 13.
10
[Information disclosure and decision making preferences of patients with advanced cancer in a Pain and Palliative Care Unit in Chile].[智利一家疼痛与姑息治疗病房中晚期癌症患者的信息披露与决策偏好]
Rev Med Chil. 2014 Jan;142(1):48-54. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872014000100008.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging the care gap: patients' needs and experiences regarding shared decision-making in radiotherapy.弥合护理差距:患者在放射治疗共同决策方面的需求与体验
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024 Nov 24;50:100897. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100897. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Knowledge and Preference of Filipino COPD Patients on Advance Care Planning: A Cross-sectional Survey.菲律宾慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者对预先护理计划的认知与偏好:一项横断面调查。
Acta Med Philipp. 2023 Apr 28;57(4):41-50. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.2320. eCollection 2023.
3
A Joanna Briggs Institute Framework Approach to Shared Decision Making in End-of-Life.
乔安娜·布里格斯研究所终末期共享决策框架方法
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70041. doi: 10.1111/hex.70041.
4
How do Patients With Advanced Cancer and Family Caregivers Accommodate One Another in Decision-Making? Findings From a Qualitative Study in Specialist Palliative Care.晚期癌症患者及其家庭照顾者在决策过程中如何相互适应?一项专科姑息治疗定性研究的结果
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 May;42(5):452-458. doi: 10.1177/10499091241255117. Epub 2024 May 16.
5
Advanced directives' knowledge among Portuguese palliative patients and caregivers: do the sociodemographic factors influence it? A cross-sectional survey.晚期癌症患者和照护者对预立医疗指示的了解:社会人口因素会影响它吗?一项横断面调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jul 1;22(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01203-7.
6
Patients' preferences in therapeutic decision-making in digestive oncology: a single centre cross-sectional observational study.消化肿瘤学治疗决策中的患者偏好:单中心横断面观察研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 26;13(1):8534. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35407-x.
7
Decision-Making Preferences among Advanced Cancer Patients in a Palliative Setting in Jordan.约旦缓和医疗环境下晚期癌症患者的决策偏好。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 18;20(8):5550. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20085550.
8
Truth-telling in Oncology: Egyptian Patients' Attitudes and Preferences.肿瘤学中的真话告知:埃及患者的态度和偏好。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Dec 1;23(12):4227-4231. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.12.4227.
9
Patients' Preference for Participation in Medical Decision-Making: Secondary Analysis of the BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE Trial.患者对参与医疗决策的偏好:BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE 试验的二次分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Apr;38(5):1180-1189. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07775-z. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
10
Effects of the Heart to Heart Card Game for Patients with Advanced Cancer Receiving Home-Based Palliative Care: A Clinical Randomized Controlled Trial.《基于家庭的临终关怀中晚期癌症患者使用心连心卡牌游戏的效果:一项临床随机对照试验》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 17;19(10):6115. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106115.