Suppr超能文献

[语音节拍器对电话辅助旁观者心肺复苏中按压速率和深度的影响:一项研究者设盲、三臂、随机模拟试验]

[Effects of a voice metronome on compression rate and depth in telephone assisted, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: an investigator-blinded, 3-armed, randomized, simulation trial].

作者信息

van Tulder Raphael, Roth Dominik, Krammel Mario, Laggner Roberta, Schriefl Christoph, Kienbacher Calvin, Lorenzo Hartmann Alexander, Novosad Heinz, Constantin Chwojka Christof, Havel Christoph, Schreiber Wolfgang, Herkner Harald

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

Department of General Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Viena, Austria.

出版信息

Emergencias. 2015;27(6):357-363.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the effect on compression rate and depth of a conventional metronome and a voice metronome in simulated telephone-assisted, protocol-driven bystander Cardiopulmonary resucitation (CPR) compared to standard instruction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-six lay volunteers performed 10 minutes of compression-only CPR in a prospective, investigator-blinded, 3-arm study on a manikin. Participants were randomized either to standard instruction ("push down firmly, 5 cm"), a regular metronome pacing 110 beats per minute (bpm), or a voice metronome continuously prompting "deep-deepdeep- deeper" at 110 bpm. The primary outcome was deviation from the ideal chest compression target range (50 mm compression depth x 100 compressions per minute x 10 minutes = 50 m). Secondary outcomes were CPR quality measures (compression and leaning depth, rate, no-flow times) and participants' related physiological response (heart rate, blood pressure and nine hole peg test and borg scales score). We used a linear regression model to calculate effects.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) deviation from the ideal target range (50 m) was -11 (9) m in the standard group, -20 (11) m in the conventional metronome group (adjusted difference [95%, CI], 9.0 [1.2-17.5 m], P=.03), and -18 (9) m in the voice metronome group (adjusted difference, 7.2 [-0.9-15.3] m, P=.08). Secondary outcomes (CPR quality measures and physiological response of participants to CPR performance) showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Compared to standard instruction, the conventional metronome showed a significant negative effect on the chest compression target range. The voice metronome showed a non-significant negative effect and therefore cannot be recommended for regular use in telephone-assisted CPR.

摘要

目的

我们研究了在模拟电话辅助、协议驱动的旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)中,与标准指导相比,传统节拍器和语音节拍器对按压速率和深度的影响。

材料与方法

36名非专业志愿者在一项前瞻性、研究者盲法、三臂研究中,在模拟人上进行了10分钟的单纯按压CPR。参与者被随机分为标准指导组(“用力向下按压,5厘米”)、每分钟110次心跳(bpm)的常规节拍器组,或每分钟110次心跳(bpm)持续提示“深深深-更深”的语音节拍器组。主要结局是偏离理想胸外按压目标范围(50毫米按压深度×每分钟100次按压×10分钟 = 50米)。次要结局是CPR质量指标(按压和倾斜深度、速率、无血流时间)以及参与者的相关生理反应(心率、血压、九孔插针试验和伯格量表评分)。我们使用线性回归模型来计算效应。

结果

标准组偏离理想目标范围(50米)的均值(标准差)为-11(9)米,传统节拍器组为-20(11)米(调整差异[95%,置信区间],9.0[1.2 - 17.5米],P = 0.03),语音节拍器组为-18(9)米(调整差异,7.2[-0.9 - 15.3]米,P = 0.08)。次要结局(CPR质量指标和参与者对CPR操作的生理反应)无显著差异。

结论

与标准指导相比,传统节拍器对胸外按压目标范围有显著负面影响。语音节拍器显示出非显著的负面影响,因此不建议在电话辅助CPR中常规使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验