Suppr超能文献

使用节拍器对心肺复苏质量的影响。

Effects of metronome use on cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality.

作者信息

Çalışkan Dikmen, Bildik Fikret, Aslaner Mehmet Ali, Kılıçaslan İsa, Keleş Ayfer, Demircan Ahmet

机构信息

Emergency Service, Antalya Kepez State Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.

Department of Emergency, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Emerg Med. 2021 Feb 12;21(2):51-55. doi: 10.4103/2452-2473.309137. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Whether the use of metronome affects the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the effect of metronome use on CPR quality.

METHODS

This was a prospective, simulation-based CPR manikin study. There were two phases: without and with metronome use. Chest compression was performed for 2 min, and three CPR quality criteria including chest compression depth, recoil, and rate were recorded with TrueCPR Feedback Device in both phases.

RESULTS

In all, 102 resident physicians were included. The achievement of optimal chest compression depth and complete recoil was better with metronome use than without (83% and 77% vs. 78% and 39%, ≤ 0.001, respectively). Optimal chest compression rate was also reached with metronome use because the range of the compression rate was closer to the normal limits than those without metronome use (110 [interquartile range (IQR) 109-113] vs. 120 [IQR 109-129], ≤ 0.001). Of all the participants, 70.6% stated that metronome use had a positive effect on their performance during the CPR application and 66.7% stated that they wished to use the metronome in their daily practice.

CONCLUSION

Using a metronome during simulation-based CPR improved the compression depth and recoil by fixing chest compression rate. We suggested that metronome should be used in CPR trainings of health-care professionals.

摘要

目的

节拍器的使用是否会影响心肺复苏(CPR)的质量尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们调查了使用节拍器对CPR质量的影响。

方法

这是一项基于模拟的CPR人体模型前瞻性研究。分为两个阶段:不使用节拍器和使用节拍器。进行2分钟的胸外按压,两个阶段均使用TrueCPR反馈设备记录包括胸外按压深度、回弹和速率在内的三项CPR质量标准。

结果

总共纳入了102名住院医师。使用节拍器时达到最佳胸外按压深度和完全回弹的情况比不使用时更好(分别为83%和77%对78%和39%,P≤0.001)。使用节拍器时也达到了最佳胸外按压速率,因为按压速率范围比不使用节拍器时更接近正常范围(110[四分位间距(IQR)109 - 113]对120[IQR 109 - 129],P≤0.001)。在所有参与者中,70.6%表示使用节拍器对他们在CPR操作过程中的表现有积极影响,66.7%表示他们希望在日常实践中使用节拍器。

结论

在基于模拟的CPR过程中使用节拍器通过固定胸外按压速率改善了按压深度和回弹。我们建议在医护人员的CPR培训中应使用节拍器。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8dd/8092000/9a076f919596/TJEM-21-51-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验