• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与式生理和心理社会干预对平衡工业工人需求和资源的有效性:一项群组随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of a participatory physical and psychosocial intervention to balance the demands and resources of industrial workers: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

National Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):58-68. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3689. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

DOI:10.5271/sjweh.3689
PMID:29095478
Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a participatory physical and psychosocial workplace intervention (known as PIPPI) on work ability and recovery among industrial workers. Methods Eligible workers were cluster-randomized into intervention (N=193) and control (N=222) groups. Intervention group members participated in three workshops where they mapped positive and negative aspects of their physical and psychosocial work environment and developed action plans addressing the highlighted issues, which were subsequently implemented by the participants. Questionnaire-based data on work ability and recovery were collected at baseline and 8-, 10- and 12-month follow-up. Data on productivity, well-being, mental health, and physical demands and resources were collected at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Results The intervention was delivered and received as planned (100% planned workshops conducted, 69% [standard deviation (SD) 7%] participation in workshops) and with a response rate of 76% (SD 8%) to the questionnaires. No significant between-group improvements for any of the outcomes were found in intention-to-treat multi-level mixed models. On the contrary, tendencies were observed for poorer recovery and reduced work ability in the intervention compared to control group. Conclusion The intervention did not improve the outcomes. This result can have several explanations, such as a regression-toward-the-mean effect or that the intervention might have put an additional burden on the workers already facing high work demands. In addition, there may have been an insufficient match between the intervention components implemented and the predetermined outcomes, and implementation may have been unsuccessful. These potential explanations need to be investigated using process evaluation data.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在评估一种参与式身体和心理社会工作场所干预(称为 PIPPI)对工业工人工作能力和恢复的效果。

方法 符合条件的工人被整群随机分为干预组(N=193)和对照组(N=222)。干预组的成员参加了三个研讨会,在会上他们绘制了自己身体和心理社会工作环境的积极和消极方面,并制定了针对突出问题的行动计划,随后由参与者实施。在基线和 8、10 和 12 个月的随访中收集了关于工作能力和恢复的基于问卷的数据。在基线和 12 个月的随访中收集了关于生产力、幸福感、心理健康以及身体需求和资源的数据。

结果 干预按计划进行和接受(计划的研讨会 100%进行,69%[标准差(SD)7%]参加研讨会),问卷的响应率为 76%(SD 8%)。在意向性治疗多层次混合模型中,没有发现任何组间结局有显著改善。相反,与对照组相比,干预组的恢复和工作能力呈现出较差的趋势。

结论 干预并没有改善结果。这种结果可能有几种解释,例如回归均值效应,或者干预可能给已经面临高工作要求的工人增加了额外的负担。此外,实施的干预措施与预定的结果之间可能不匹配,并且实施可能不成功。这些潜在的解释需要使用过程评估数据进行调查。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a participatory physical and psychosocial intervention to balance the demands and resources of industrial workers: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.参与式生理和心理社会干预对平衡工业工人需求和资源的有效性:一项群组随机对照试验。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):58-68. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3689. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
2
A participatory physical and psychosocial intervention for balancing the demands and resources among industrial workers (PIPPI): study protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.一项旨在平衡产业工人需求与资源的参与式身体和社会心理干预措施(PIPPI):一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 20;15:274. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1621-9.
3
Effects of a worker participatory program for improving work environments on job stressors and mental health among workers: a controlled trial.一项关于工人参与改善工作环境计划对工人工作压力源和心理健康影响的对照试验。
J Occup Health. 2008;50(6):455-70. doi: 10.1539/joh.l7166. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
4
IMPROVEjob - Participatory intervention to improve job satisfaction of general practice teams: a model for structural and behavioural prevention in small and medium-sized enterprises - a study protocol of a cluster-randomised controlled trial.改善工作(job)-参与式干预措施提高一般实践团队的工作满意度: 中小企业结构和行为预防的模型-一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 16;21(1):532. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04427-7.
5
Participatory intervention for workplace improvements on mental health and job performance among blue-collar workers: a cluster randomized controlled trial.针对蓝领工人心理健康和工作绩效的工作场所改善参与式干预:一项整群随机对照试验。
J Occup Environ Med. 2009 May;51(5):554-63. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181a24d28.
6
[A two-year program to promote participatory workplace environmental improvements at small enterprises with fewer than ten employees].[一项为期两年的计划,旨在促进员工人数少于十人的小企业参与工作场所环境改善]
Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2020 Nov 25;62(6):249-260. doi: 10.1539/sangyoeisei.2019-022-E. Epub 2020 May 27.
7
The impact of workplace ergonomics and neck-specific exercise versus ergonomics and health promotion interventions on office worker productivity: A cluster-randomized trial.工作场所人体工程学和颈部特定运动与人体工程学和健康促进干预对办公人员生产力的影响:一项集群随机试验。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 Jan 1;45(1):42-52. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3760. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
8
Towards an assessment of psychosocial work factors in a multi-level mental health intervention in the workplace: results from the MENTUPP pilot-study.迈向多层面职场心理健康干预中心理社会工作因素评估:MENTUPP 试点研究结果。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2024 Oct;97(8):915-929. doi: 10.1007/s00420-024-02096-6. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
9
Results of caring and reaching for health (CARE): a cluster-randomized controlled trial assessing a worksite wellness intervention for child care staff.关爱与追求健康的结果(CARE):一项评估儿童保育工作者工作场所健康干预措施的集群随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 May 15;17(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00968-x.
10
A cluster randomized controlled trial to reduce office workers' sitting time: effect on productivity outcomes.一项旨在减少办公人员久坐时间的整群随机对照试验:对生产力结果的影响。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 Sep 1;45(5):483-492. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3820. Epub 2019 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Organizational role stress, quality of work life, organizational citizenship behavior, and psychological well-being among university faculty members.大学教师的组织角色压力、工作生活质量、组织公民行为和心理健康
BMC Psychol. 2025 May 21;13(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02883-x.
2
Can an organizationally anchored, multilevel intervention improve perceived stress and psychosocial factors in the workplace? A pre-post study assessing effectiveness and implementation.一个基于组织的多层次干预能否改善工作场所的感知压力和社会心理因素?一项评估有效性和实施情况的前后对照研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20801-5.
3
Work conditions and determinants of health status among industrial shift workers: a cross-sectional study.
产业轮班工人的工作条件与健康状况决定因素:一项横断面研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;12:1489178. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1489178. eCollection 2024.
4
Effectiveness of workplace health promotion programs for industrial workers: a systematic review.针对产业工人的工作场所健康促进项目的有效性:一项系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 15;25(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21365-8.
5
Disposal of SARS-CoV-2 corpses: experiences of environmental health officers.SARS-CoV-2 尸体的处理:环境卫生官员的经验。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):3062. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20569-8.
6
Effects of a co-created occupational health intervention on stress and psychosocial working conditions within the construction industry: A controlled trial.一项合作创建的职业健康干预对建筑行业压力和心理社会工作条件的影响:一项对照试验。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 23;10:973890. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.973890. eCollection 2022.
7
Further psychometric evaluation of the Structured Multidisciplinary Work Evaluation Tool (SMET) questionnaire: Practical implications in healthcare settings.进一步心理计量学评估结构多学科工作评估工具(SMET)问卷:在医疗保健环境中的实际意义。
Work. 2022;73(4):1279-1295. doi: 10.3233/WOR-210095.
8
Evaluating the Effect of Supported Systematic Work Environment Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.评估新冠疫情期间支持性系统工作环境管理的效果:一项混合方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Mar 10;11(3):e34152. doi: 10.2196/34152.
9
Designing industrial work to be 'just right' to promote health - a study protocol for a goldilocks work intervention.设计“恰到好处”的工业工作以促进健康——一项金发姑娘工作干预研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 23;22(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12643-w.
10
Co-Creating an Occupational Health Intervention within the Construction Industry in Sweden: Stakeholder Perceptions of the Process and Output.在瑞典的建筑行业中共同创建职业健康干预措施:利益相关者对过程和结果的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 7;18(24):12872. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412872.