National Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):58-68. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3689. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a participatory physical and psychosocial workplace intervention (known as PIPPI) on work ability and recovery among industrial workers. Methods Eligible workers were cluster-randomized into intervention (N=193) and control (N=222) groups. Intervention group members participated in three workshops where they mapped positive and negative aspects of their physical and psychosocial work environment and developed action plans addressing the highlighted issues, which were subsequently implemented by the participants. Questionnaire-based data on work ability and recovery were collected at baseline and 8-, 10- and 12-month follow-up. Data on productivity, well-being, mental health, and physical demands and resources were collected at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Results The intervention was delivered and received as planned (100% planned workshops conducted, 69% [standard deviation (SD) 7%] participation in workshops) and with a response rate of 76% (SD 8%) to the questionnaires. No significant between-group improvements for any of the outcomes were found in intention-to-treat multi-level mixed models. On the contrary, tendencies were observed for poorer recovery and reduced work ability in the intervention compared to control group. Conclusion The intervention did not improve the outcomes. This result can have several explanations, such as a regression-toward-the-mean effect or that the intervention might have put an additional burden on the workers already facing high work demands. In addition, there may have been an insufficient match between the intervention components implemented and the predetermined outcomes, and implementation may have been unsuccessful. These potential explanations need to be investigated using process evaluation data.
目的 本研究旨在评估一种参与式身体和心理社会工作场所干预(称为 PIPPI)对工业工人工作能力和恢复的效果。
方法 符合条件的工人被整群随机分为干预组(N=193)和对照组(N=222)。干预组的成员参加了三个研讨会,在会上他们绘制了自己身体和心理社会工作环境的积极和消极方面,并制定了针对突出问题的行动计划,随后由参与者实施。在基线和 8、10 和 12 个月的随访中收集了关于工作能力和恢复的基于问卷的数据。在基线和 12 个月的随访中收集了关于生产力、幸福感、心理健康以及身体需求和资源的数据。
结果 干预按计划进行和接受(计划的研讨会 100%进行,69%[标准差(SD)7%]参加研讨会),问卷的响应率为 76%(SD 8%)。在意向性治疗多层次混合模型中,没有发现任何组间结局有显著改善。相反,与对照组相比,干预组的恢复和工作能力呈现出较差的趋势。
结论 干预并没有改善结果。这种结果可能有几种解释,例如回归均值效应,或者干预可能给已经面临高工作要求的工人增加了额外的负担。此外,实施的干预措施与预定的结果之间可能不匹配,并且实施可能不成功。这些潜在的解释需要使用过程评估数据进行调查。