• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在瑞典的建筑行业中共同创建职业健康干预措施:利益相关者对过程和结果的看法。

Co-Creating an Occupational Health Intervention within the Construction Industry in Sweden: Stakeholder Perceptions of the Process and Output.

机构信息

Unit of Occupational Medicine, Institute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 7;18(24):12872. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412872.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph182412872
PMID:34948487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8700815/
Abstract

One way to prevent work-related stress, is to implement primary occupational health interventions aimed at improving the psychosocial work environment. However, such interventions have shown a limited effect, often due to implementation failure and poor contextual fit. Co-creation, where researchers, together with end-users and other relevant stakeholders, develop the intervention is increasingly encouraged. However, few studies have evaluated the effects of co-created interventions, and participants' experience of the co-creation process. This is one of the first studies evaluating stakeholder perceptions of co-creating an occupational health intervention. We applied a thematic analysis, with data from 12 semi-structured interviews with stakeholders involved in the co-creation. Our results show that the respondents, in general, were satisfied with engaging in the co-creation, and they reported an increased awareness regarding risk factors of stress and how these should be handled. Additionally, the respondents described trust in the intervention activities and a good fit into the context. The study indicates that co-creating occupational health interventions can enhance the implementation and the contextual fit.

摘要

预防与工作相关的压力的一种方法是实施初级职业健康干预,旨在改善心理社会工作环境。然而,此类干预的效果有限,通常是由于实施失败和适应不良造成的。共同创造(co-creation)越来越受到鼓励,即研究人员与最终用户和其他相关利益攸关方共同开发干预措施。然而,很少有研究评估共同创造干预措施的效果,以及参与者对共同创造过程的体验。这是评估利益攸关方对共同创造职业健康干预措施的看法的首批研究之一。我们应用主题分析方法,对参与共同创造的 12 名利益攸关方进行了半结构化访谈。我们的研究结果表明,受访者普遍对参与共同创造感到满意,并报告说他们对压力的风险因素以及如何应对这些因素有了更多的认识。此外,受访者还描述了对干预活动的信任和良好的适应能力。该研究表明,共同创造职业健康干预措施可以提高实施效果和适应能力。

相似文献

1
Co-Creating an Occupational Health Intervention within the Construction Industry in Sweden: Stakeholder Perceptions of the Process and Output.在瑞典的建筑行业中共同创建职业健康干预措施:利益相关者对过程和结果的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 7;18(24):12872. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412872.
2
Study protocol of a co-created primary organizational-level intervention with the aim to improve organizational and social working conditions and decrease stress within the construction industry - a controlled trial.一项共同创建的主要组织层面干预措施的研究方案,旨在改善建筑行业的组织和社会工作条件,并减少压力 - 一项对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08542-7.
3
Effects of a co-created occupational health intervention on stress and psychosocial working conditions within the construction industry: A controlled trial.一项合作创建的职业健康干预对建筑行业压力和心理社会工作条件的影响:一项对照试验。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 23;10:973890. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.973890. eCollection 2022.
4
Barriers to and facilitators of implementing complex workplace dietary interventions: process evaluation results of a cluster controlled trial.实施复杂工作场所饮食干预措施的障碍与促进因素:一项整群对照试验的过程评估结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 21;16:139. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1413-7.
5
The effectiveness of mindfulness based programs in reducing stress experienced by nurses in adult hospital settings: a systematic review of quantitative evidence protocol.基于正念的项目在减轻成人医院环境中护士所经历压力方面的有效性:定量证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):21-9. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2380.
6
Stakeholders' Perceptions Regarding Adaptation and Implementation of Existing Individual and Environmental Workplace Health Promotion Interventions in Blue-Collar Work Settings.利益相关者对现有个体和环境工作场所健康促进干预措施在蓝领工作环境中的适应性和实施的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;19(20):13545. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013545.
7
A Participatory Intervention to Improve the Psychosocial Work Environment and Mental Health in Human Service Organisations. A Mixed Methods Evaluation Study.参与式干预以改善人类服务组织的心理社会工作环境和心理健康。一项混合方法评估研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 29;18(7):3546. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073546.
8
Occupational advice to help people return to work following lower limb arthroplasty: the OPAL intervention mapping study.下肢关节置换术后帮助患者重返工作岗位的职业建议:OPAL 干预映射研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(45):1-408. doi: 10.3310/hta24450.
9
The EMPOWER Occupational e-Mental Health Intervention Implementation Checklist to Foster e-Mental Health Interventions in the Workplace: Development Study.《促进职场电子心理健康干预措施实施的 EMPOWER 职业电子心理健康干预措施实施清单:开发研究》。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 15;26:e48504. doi: 10.2196/48504.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the efficacy of a job rotation for improving occupational physical and psychosocial work environment, musculoskeletal health, social equality, production quality and resilience at a commercial laundromat: protocol for a longitudinal case study.评估岗位轮换对改善商业洗衣店职业物理和心理社会工作环境、肌肉骨骼健康、社会平等、生产质量和弹性的效果:一项纵向案例研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 12;13(5):e067633. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067633.
2
Co-creation and self-evaluation: An accountability mechanism process in water, sanitation and hygiene services delivery in childcare centres in Nairobi's informal settlements.共同创造和自我评估:内罗毕非正规住区儿童保育中心供水、环境卫生和个人卫生服务提供中的问责机制过程。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 12;10:1035284. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035284. eCollection 2022.
3

本文引用的文献

1
How to design, implement and evaluate organizational interventions for maximum impact: the Sigtuna Principles.如何设计、实施和评估组织干预措施以实现最大影响:锡格蒂纳原则。
Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2020 Aug 26;30(3):415-427. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2020.1803960. eCollection 2021.
2
Effectiveness of workplace wellness programmes for dietary habits, overweight, and cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.工作场所健康促进计划对饮食习惯、超重和心血管代谢健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Sep;6(9):e648-e660. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00140-7.
3
Workplace wellness programmes to improve health.
The effectiveness of organisational-level workplace mental health interventions on mental health and wellbeing in construction workers: A systematic review and recommended research agenda.组织层面的工作场所心理健康干预措施对建筑工人心理健康和幸福感的有效性:系统评价和推荐的研究议程。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 16;17(11):e0277114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277114. eCollection 2022.
4
Effects of a co-created occupational health intervention on stress and psychosocial working conditions within the construction industry: A controlled trial.一项合作创建的职业健康干预对建筑行业压力和心理社会工作条件的影响:一项对照试验。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 23;10:973890. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.973890. eCollection 2022.
改善健康的职场健康计划。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Sep;6(9):e625. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00184-5.
4
Psychosocial work exposures and health outcomes: a meta-review of 72 literature reviews with meta-analysis.心理社会工作暴露与健康结果:72 篇文献综述的荟萃分析元综述。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Oct 1;47(7):489-508. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3968. Epub 2021 May 27.
5
A Participatory Intervention to Improve the Psychosocial Work Environment and Mental Health in Human Service Organisations. A Mixed Methods Evaluation Study.参与式干预以改善人类服务组织的心理社会工作环境和心理健康。一项混合方法评估研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 29;18(7):3546. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073546.
6
Co-production of knowledge: the future.知识共创:未来。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 16;372:n434. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n434.
7
Co-Creating and Evaluating an App-Based Well-Being Intervention: The HOW (Healthier Outcomes at Work) Social Work Project.基于应用程序的幸福感干预措施的共同创建和评估:HOW(工作中更健康的结果)社会工作项目。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 24;17(23):8730. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238730.
8
Process Evaluation of a Participative Organizational Intervention as a Stress Preventive Intervention for Employees in Swedish Primary Health Care.参与式组织干预作为瑞典初级卫生保健中员工压力预防干预的效果评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 6;17(19):7285. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197285.
9
Study protocol of a co-created primary organizational-level intervention with the aim to improve organizational and social working conditions and decrease stress within the construction industry - a controlled trial.一项共同创建的主要组织层面干预措施的研究方案,旨在改善建筑行业的组织和社会工作条件,并减少压力 - 一项对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08542-7.
10
A qualitative evaluation of participants' experiences of using co-design to develop a collective leadership educational intervention for health-care teams.对参与者使用共同设计来开发医疗保健团队集体领导力教育干预措施的体验进行定性评估。
Health Expect. 2020 Apr;23(2):358-367. doi: 10.1111/hex.13002. Epub 2020 Jan 30.