• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Towards an assessment of psychosocial work factors in a multi-level mental health intervention in the workplace: results from the MENTUPP pilot-study.迈向多层面职场心理健康干预中心理社会工作因素评估:MENTUPP 试点研究结果。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2024 Oct;97(8):915-929. doi: 10.1007/s00420-024-02096-6. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
2
Outcome assessment of a complex mental health intervention in the workplace. Results from the MENTUPP pilot study.工作场所复杂心理健康干预的结果评估。MENTUPP 试点研究的结果。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2023 Oct;96(8):1149-1165. doi: 10.1007/s00420-023-01996-3. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
3
Mental Health Promotion and Intervention in Occupational Settings: Protocol for a Pilot Study of the MENTUPP Intervention.职业环境中的心理健康促进和干预:MENTUPP 干预的试点研究方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 15;19(2):947. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020947.
4
Implementation and evaluation of a multi-level mental health promotion intervention for the workplace (MENTUPP): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.多层面职场心理健康促进干预措施(MENTUPP)的实施和评估:一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Sep 30;24(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07537-0.
5
Implementing a complex mental health intervention in occupational settings: process evaluation of the MENTUPP pilot study.在职业环境中实施复杂的心理健康干预措施:MENTUPP 试点研究的过程评估。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 14;13(12):e077093. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077093.
6
[A two-year program to promote participatory workplace environmental improvements at small enterprises with fewer than ten employees].[一项为期两年的计划,旨在促进员工人数少于十人的小企业参与工作场所环境改善]
Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2020 Nov 25;62(6):249-260. doi: 10.1539/sangyoeisei.2019-022-E. Epub 2020 May 27.
7
IMPROVEjob - Participatory intervention to improve job satisfaction of general practice teams: a model for structural and behavioural prevention in small and medium-sized enterprises - a study protocol of a cluster-randomised controlled trial.改善工作(job)-参与式干预措施提高一般实践团队的工作满意度: 中小企业结构和行为预防的模型-一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 16;21(1):532. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04427-7.
8
Workplace bullying and mental health among teachers in relation to psychosocial job characteristics and burnout.教师工作场所霸凌与心理健康:与心理社会工作特征及职业倦怠的关系
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017 Jun 19;30(4):629-640. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00943. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
9
Psychosocial work environment of hospital workers: validation of a comprehensive assessment scale.医院工作人员的社会心理工作环境:一种综合评估量表的验证
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Jul;44(5):814-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.01.008. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
10
The Danish Psychosocial Work Environment Questionnaire (DPQ): Development, content, reliability and validity.丹麦心理社会工作环境问卷(DPQ):编制、内容、信度和效度。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 Jul 1;45(4):356-369. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3793. Epub 2018 Dec 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing a complex mental health intervention in occupational settings: process evaluation of the MENTUPP pilot study.在职业环境中实施复杂的心理健康干预措施:MENTUPP 试点研究的过程评估。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 14;13(12):e077093. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077093.
2
Work-related causes of mental health conditions and interventions for their improvement in workplaces.工作相关的心理健康问题的原因,以及改善工作场所心理健康的干预措施。
Lancet. 2023 Oct 14;402(10410):1368-1381. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00869-3.
3
Suicide Risks of Health Care Workers in the US.美国医护人员的自杀风险。
JAMA. 2023 Sep 26;330(12):1161-1166. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.15787.
4
Outcome assessment of a complex mental health intervention in the workplace. Results from the MENTUPP pilot study.工作场所复杂心理健康干预的结果评估。MENTUPP 试点研究的结果。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2023 Oct;96(8):1149-1165. doi: 10.1007/s00420-023-01996-3. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
5
Developing a framework for evaluation: a Theory of Change for complex workplace mental health interventions.制定评估框架:复杂工作场所心理健康干预的变革理论。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 17;23(1):1171. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16092-x.
6
Occupational Risk Factors by Sectors: An Observational Study of 20,000 Workers.职业风险因素按行业划分:对 20000 名工人的观察性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 18;20(4):3632. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043632.
7
Evidence for the effectiveness of interventions to reduce mental health related stigma in the workplace: a systematic review.干预措施减少工作场所心理健康相关污名的有效性证据:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 20;13(2):e067126. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067126.
8
The Association of Resilience with Mental Health in a Large Population-Based Sample (LIFE-Adult-Study).韧性与大型基于人群样本(LIFE 成人研究)中精神健康的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 29;19(23):15944. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315944.
9
The effectiveness of organisational-level workplace mental health interventions on mental health and wellbeing in construction workers: A systematic review and recommended research agenda.组织层面的工作场所心理健康干预措施对建筑工人心理健康和幸福感的有效性:系统评价和推荐的研究议程。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 16;17(11):e0277114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277114. eCollection 2022.
10
Suicide in the Construction Industry: A Targeted Meta-analysis.建筑行业中的自杀行为:一项针对性的荟萃分析。
Arch Suicide Res. 2023 Oct-Dec;27(4):1134-1146. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2022.2131488. Epub 2022 Oct 13.

迈向多层面职场心理健康干预中心理社会工作因素评估:MENTUPP 试点研究结果。

Towards an assessment of psychosocial work factors in a multi-level mental health intervention in the workplace: results from the MENTUPP pilot-study.

机构信息

LUCAS, Centre for Care Research and Consultancy, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.

National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2024 Oct;97(8):915-929. doi: 10.1007/s00420-024-02096-6. Epub 2024 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00420-024-02096-6
PMID:39162783
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11485064/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mental health in the workplace is a growing concern for enterprises and policy makers. MENTUPP is a multi-level mental health intervention implemented in small and medium size enterprises from three work sectors in nine countries. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, delivery, and instruments for the MENTUPP intervention to inform the planning of a clustered randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

We administered items from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire and the Danish Work Environment Cohort Study measuring psychosocial workplace factors. The questionnaire was answered by 382 participants at baseline, of which 98 participants also answered after six months at follow-up. We calculated mean scores of 19 psychosocial factors at baseline and conducted repeated measures ANOVAs to assess differences in eight psychosocial factors at follow-up. We also examined whether outcomes differed between work sectors and job positions at follow-up.

RESULTS

The construction sector and workers with no or a lower leadership role reported more negative working environment factors at baseline. We observed a statistically significant decline in social support from colleagues and social community at work, and a marginally significant decline in justice at work. For the rest of the constructs, we did not observe statistically significant changes.

CONCLUSIONS

We found significant differences in psychosocial work environment factors among work sectors and job positions at baseline. Contrary to our hypotheses, three psychosocial work environment factors decreased at follow-up. Possible explanations are the utilization of specific psychosocial factors as resources to cope with psychosocial stressors, high participant expectations that were not met by the intervention, insufficient time for structural changes, or the intervention prompting critical evaluations of the work environment. These findings will inform the design and implementation of the forthcoming clustered randomized controlled trial, where they will also be further investigated to validate their significance.

摘要

背景

职场心理健康是企业和政策制定者日益关注的问题。MENTUPP 是一项多层次的心理健康干预措施,在来自三个工作领域的九个国家的中小企业中实施。本试点研究旨在评估 MENTUPP 干预措施的可行性、实施情况和工具,以为集群随机对照试验的规划提供信息。

方法

我们采用了哥本哈根心理社会问卷和丹麦工作环境队列研究中的项目来衡量心理社会工作场所因素。共有 382 名参与者在基线时回答了问卷,其中 98 名参与者在 6 个月的随访时也回答了问卷。我们计算了 19 个心理社会因素的平均得分,并进行了重复测量方差分析,以评估 8 个心理社会因素在随访时的差异。我们还检查了在随访时不同工作领域和职位之间的结果是否存在差异。

结果

建筑行业和没有或较低领导角色的工人在基线时报告了更多负面的工作环境因素。我们观察到同事和工作中的社会支持以及工作中的公正程度显著下降,而在其余结构中,我们没有观察到统计学上的显著变化。

结论

我们在基线时发现了工作领域和职位之间心理社会工作环境因素的显著差异。与我们的假设相反,有三个心理社会工作环境因素在随访时下降。可能的解释是利用特定的心理社会因素作为应对心理压力源的资源,干预措施没有满足参与者的高期望,没有足够的时间进行结构变革,或者干预措施促使对工作环境进行批判性评估。这些发现将为即将进行的集群随机对照试验的设计和实施提供信息,我们也将进一步调查这些发现的意义,以验证其重要性。