• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左侧开胸术在离心式连续血流左心室辅助装置植入中的应用:来自机械循环支持研究网络的分析。

Left Lateral Thoracotomy for Centrifugal Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement: An Analysis from the Mechanical Circulatory Support Research Network.

机构信息

From the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.

Department of General Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago/MGH, Illinois.

出版信息

ASAIO J. 2018 Nov/Dec;64(6):715-720. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000714.

DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000000714
PMID:29095733
Abstract

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) have revolutionized the management of patients with advanced heart failure. Alternative implant strategies are increasingly used for device placement. We reviewed our experience from the Mechanical Circulatory Support Research Network registry with the HeartWare centrifugal CF-LVAD (HVAD). From May 2004 to August 2015, 1,150 patients underwent primary CF-LVAD implantation at our institutions. Within this group, a total of 283 patients (25%) were implanted with the HVAD. A minimally invasive left lateral thoracotomy (MILT) implant strategy was used in 53 patients (20%), of which 22 (42%) were implanted off-pump. Median age at implant was 59 years and 183 patients (65%) were implanted as bridge-to-transplantation. Follow-up was 100% complete for a total of 302 patient-years of support. In-hospital mortality was 4.9% (14 patients), and was comparable between the conventional sternotomy (CS) and MILT cohorts (p = 0.15). Patients in the MILT cohort had a shorter median length of stay (p < 0.01) and had a lower incidence of postimplant pump thrombus (p = 0.02). Cumulative survival at the end of follow-up reached 84%, and was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.298). Multivariate analysis identified preoperative bilirubin level as the only independent predictor of survival. Surgical technique had no impact on survival. In this large, multicenter experience, data demonstrate excellent survival and adverse event profiles for patients supported with the HVAD technology, regardless of surgical implant technique. With constant advancements in device technology along with our increasing clinical experience with the newer techniques, minimally invasive LVAD implantation continues to evolve as a valuable alternative to CS in selected patients.

摘要

持续流动左心室辅助装置 (CF-LVAD) 彻底改变了晚期心力衰竭患者的治疗方式。替代植入策略越来越多地用于设备放置。我们回顾了我们在机械循环支持研究网络注册中心使用 HeartWare 离心 CF-LVAD (HVAD) 的经验。从 2004 年 5 月到 2015 年 8 月,我们的机构对 1150 名患者进行了首次 CF-LVAD 植入。在这一组中,共有 283 名患者 (25%) 植入了 HVAD。微创左侧开胸术 (MILT) 植入策略用于 53 名患者 (20%),其中 22 名患者 (42%) 为非体外循环植入。植入时的中位年龄为 59 岁,183 名患者 (65%) 作为桥接移植植入。共有 302 名患者完成了 302 患者年的随访。住院死亡率为 4.9% (14 例),传统胸骨切开术 (CS) 和 MILT 队列之间无差异 (p = 0.15)。MILT 组的中位住院时间更短 (p < 0.01),且植入后泵血栓形成的发生率较低 (p = 0.02)。随访结束时的累积生存率达到 84%,两组之间无差异 (p = 0.298)。多变量分析确定术前胆红素水平是生存的唯一独立预测因子。手术技术对生存没有影响。在这项大型多中心经验中,数据表明,无论采用何种手术植入技术,HVAD 技术支持的患者的生存和不良事件谱都非常出色。随着设备技术的不断进步以及我们对新技术的临床经验不断增加,微创 LVAD 植入在选定患者中继续作为 CS 的有价值替代方法不断发展。

相似文献

1
Left Lateral Thoracotomy for Centrifugal Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement: An Analysis from the Mechanical Circulatory Support Research Network.左侧开胸术在离心式连续血流左心室辅助装置植入中的应用:来自机械循环支持研究网络的分析。
ASAIO J. 2018 Nov/Dec;64(6):715-720. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000714.
2
In-hospital outcomes of a minimally invasive off-pump left thoracotomy approach using a centrifugal continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.使用离心式连续流左心室辅助装置微创非体外循环左开胸术的住院治疗结果。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Jan;34(1):107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.09.023. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
3
Impact of thoracotomy approach on right ventricular failure and length of stay in left ventricular assist device implants: an intermacs registry analysis.胸腔切开术对左心室辅助装置植入患者右心衰竭和住院时间的影响:Intermacs 注册分析。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Sep;40(9):981-989. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.05.022. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
4
Evaluation of a lateral thoracotomy implant approach for a centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist device: The LATERAL clinical trial.经外侧开胸入路植入离心式左心室辅助装置的评估:LATERAL 临床试验。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Apr;38(4):344-351. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.02.002.
5
Outcomes of Patients Implanted Using a Left Thoracotomy Technique for a Miniaturized Centrifugal Continuous-Flow Pump.采用左胸切开术技术植入小型离心式连续流泵患者的预后
ASAIO J. 2016 Sep-Oct;62(5):539-44. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000407.
6
Minimally Invasive Implantation of Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: The Evolution of Surgical Techniques in a Single-Center Experience.连续流左心室辅助装置的微创植入:单中心经验中手术技术的演变
Artif Organs. 2019 Mar;43(3):E41-E52. doi: 10.1111/aor.13339. Epub 2018 Oct 28.
7
Adverse events in contemporary continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: A multi-institutional comparison shows significant differences.当代连续血流左心室辅助装置中的不良事件:多机构比较显示出显著差异。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jan;151(1):177-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.09.100. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
8
A minimally invasive off-pump implantation technique for continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: early experience.一种微创非体外循环植入技术用于连续流左心室辅助装置:早期经验。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Aug;33(8):851-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.05.016. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
9
First results of HeartWare left ventricular assist device implantation with tunnelling of the outflow graft through the transverse sinus.经横窦进行流出道移植物隧道化植入HeartWare左心室辅助装置的初步结果。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Oct 1;25(4):503-508. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx124.
10
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs database annual report: Evolving indications, outcomes, and scientific partnerships.胸外科医师学会 Intermacs 数据库年度报告:不断演变的适应证、结果和科学合作。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Feb;38(2):114-126. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.11.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Heart Transplant and Ventricular Assist: Cardiac Surgery and Heart Failure Perspective.心脏移植与心室辅助:心脏外科与心力衰竭视角
US Cardiol. 2021 Sep 24;15:e16. doi: 10.15420/usc.2021.11. eCollection 2021.
2
Does lateral approach preserve the right ventricular function after HeartMate 3 insertion?HeartMate 3植入术后,外侧入路是否能保留右心室功能?
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023 Oct 4;37(4). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad168.
3
Less is better? Comparing effects of median sternotomy and thoracotomy surgical approaches for left ventricular assist device implantation on postoperative outcomes and valvulopathy.
更少是否更好?比较正中开胸和胸腔镜手术入路在左心室辅助装置植入术后结果和瓣膜病方面的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Feb;167(2):731-743.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.04.036. Epub 2022 May 17.
4
Advancements in left ventricular assist devices to prevent pump thrombosis and blood coagulopathy.左心室辅助装置在预防泵血栓和血液凝固异常方面的进展。
J Anat. 2023 Jan;242(1):29-49. doi: 10.1111/joa.13675. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
5
Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: Current knowledge, complications, and future directions.持续血流左心室辅助装置:当前的知识、并发症和未来方向。
Cardiol J. 2022;29(2):293-304. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2021.0172. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
6
Left ventricular assist device implants in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: do we need cardiopulmonary bypass?体外膜肺氧合患者中左心室辅助装置的植入:我们是否需要体外循环?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Mar 31;34(4):676-682. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab311.
7
Conventional and alternative sites for left ventricular assist device inflow and outflow cannula placement.左心室辅助装置流入和流出插管放置的传统及替代部位。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Mar;10(2):281-288. doi: 10.21037/acs-2020-cfmcs-28.
8
Sex differences in outcomes following less-invasive left ventricular assist device implantation.微创左心室辅助装置植入术后结局的性别差异。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Mar;10(2):255-267. doi: 10.21037/acs-2020-cfmcs-21.
9
Minimally invasive ventricular assist device implantation.微创心室辅助装置植入术
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Mar;13(3):2010-2017. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-1492.
10
Minimally invasive versus conventional continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation for heart failure: a meta-analysis.心力衰竭患者微创与传统连续流左心室辅助装置植入术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Heart Fail Rev. 2022 Jul;27(4):1053-1061. doi: 10.1007/s10741-021-10102-z. Epub 2021 Apr 3.