Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia; Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of Environment (CRC CARE), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia.
Environ Pollut. 2018 Feb;233:348-355. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.089. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
In vitro assays act as surrogate measurements of relative bioavailability (RBA) for inorganic contaminants. The values derived from these assays are routinely used to refine human health risk assessments (HHRA). Extensive in vitro research has been performed on three major inorganic contaminants; As, Cd and Pb. However, the majority of these studies have evaluated the contaminants individually, even in cases when they are found as co-contaminants. Recently, in vivo studies (animal model) have determined that when the three aforementioned contaminants are present in the same soil matrix, they have the ability to influence each other's individual bioavailability. Since in vitro assays are used to inform HHRA, this study investigated whether bioaccessibility methods including the Solubility/Bioavailability Research Consortium (SBRC) assay, and physiologically based extraction test (PBET), have the ability to detect interactions between As, Cd and Pb. Using a similar dosing methodology to recently published in vivo studies, spiked aged (12 years) soil was assessed by evaluating contaminant bioaccessibility individually, in addition to tertiary combinations. In two spiked aged soils (grey and brown chromosols), there was no influence on contaminant bioaccessibility when As, Cd and Pb we present as co-contaminants. However, in a red ferrosol, the presence of As and Pb significantly decreased (p < 0.05) the bioaccessibility of Cd when assessed using gastric and intestinal phases of the SBRC assay and the PBET. Conceivable, differences in key physico-chemical properties (TOC, Fe, Al, P) between the study soils influenced contaminant interactions and bioaccessibility outcomes. Although bioaccessibility methods may not account for interactions between elements as demonstrated in in vivo models, in vitro assessment provides a conservative prediction of contaminant RBA under co-contaminant scenarios.
体外测定可作为无机污染物相对生物可利用性 (RBA) 的替代测量方法。这些测定得出的值通常用于完善人类健康风险评估 (HHRA)。已经对三种主要无机污染物(砷、镉和铅)进行了广泛的体外研究。然而,这些研究中的大多数都单独评估了污染物,即使它们是作为共存污染物存在的情况下也是如此。最近,体内研究(动物模型)已经确定,当上述三种污染物存在于同一土壤基质中时,它们有能力相互影响各自的生物可利用性。由于体外测定用于告知 HHRA,因此本研究调查了生物可利用性方法(包括可溶性/生物可利用性研究联合会 (SBRC) 测定法和基于生理学的提取测试 (PBET))是否有能力检测砷、镉和铅之间的相互作用。使用与最近发表的体内研究相似的给药方法,通过单独评估污染物的生物可利用性以及三元组合来评估添加 aged (12 年) 土壤中的污染物生物可利用性。在两种添加 aged 的土壤(灰色和棕色土)中,当砷、镉和铅作为共存污染物存在时,没有影响污染物的生物可利用性。然而,在红色铁土中,当使用 SBRC 测定法的胃和肠相以及 PBET 评估 Cd 的生物可利用性时,As 和 Pb 的存在显著降低了 Cd 的生物可利用性 (p < 0.05)。可以想象,研究土壤之间关键物理化学性质(TOC、Fe、Al、P)的差异会影响污染物相互作用和生物可利用性结果。尽管生物可利用性方法可能无法解释体内模型中元素之间的相互作用,但体外评估在共存污染物情况下提供了污染物 RBA 的保守预测。