• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 FIT 和常规筛查数据的风险调整结直肠癌筛查:风险预测模型的建立。

Risk-adjusted colorectal cancer screening using the FIT and routine screening data: development of a risk prediction model.

机构信息

Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.

Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2018 Jan;118(2):285-293. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.375. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1038/bjc.2017.375
PMID:29096402
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5785737/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is replacing the guaiac faecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening. Increased uptake and FIT positivity will challenge colonoscopy services. We developed a risk prediction model combining routine screening data with FIT concentration to improve the accuracy of screening referrals.

METHODS

Multivariate analysis used complete cases of those with a positive FIT (⩾20 μg g) and diagnostic outcome (n=1810; 549 cancers and advanced adenomas). Logistic regression was used to develop a risk prediction model using the FIT result and screening data: age, sex and previous screening history. The model was developed further using a feedforward neural network. Model performance was assessed by discrimination and calibration, and test accuracy was investigated using clinical sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Discrimination improved from 0.628 with just FIT to 0.659 with the risk-adjusted model (P=0.01). Calibration using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was 0.90 for the risk-adjusted model. The sensitivity improved from 30.78% to 33.15% at similar specificity (FIT threshold of 160 μg g). The neural network further improved model performance and test accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining routinely available risk predictors with the FIT improves the clinical sensitivity of the FIT with an increase in the diagnostic yield of high-risk adenomas.

摘要

背景

粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)正在取代粪便隐血试验(FOBT)用于结直肠癌筛查。FIT 检测的广泛应用和阳性率的提高将对结肠镜服务形成挑战。我们开发了一种风险预测模型,将常规筛查数据与 FIT 浓度相结合,以提高筛查推荐的准确性。

方法

多变量分析采用了阳性 FIT(⩾20μg g)和诊断结果的完整病例(n=1810;549 例癌症和高级腺瘤)。使用 FIT 结果和筛查数据(年龄、性别和既往筛查史)进行逻辑回归,建立风险预测模型。进一步使用前馈神经网络对模型进行开发。通过区分度和校准评估模型性能,并通过临床敏感度、特异性和接受者操作特征曲线研究测试准确性。

结果

仅使用 FIT 时,区分度为 0.628,而使用风险调整模型时为 0.659(P=0.01)。Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验校准的风险调整模型为 0.90。在保持相似特异性(FIT 阈值为 160μg g)的情况下,敏感性从 30.78%提高到 33.15%。神经网络进一步提高了模型性能和测试准确性。

结论

将常规可用的风险预测因子与 FIT 相结合,可以提高 FIT 的临床敏感度,并增加高危腺瘤的检出率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e965/5785737/5ed14b057e52/bjc2017375f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e965/5785737/374f472b8068/bjc2017375f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e965/5785737/5ed14b057e52/bjc2017375f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e965/5785737/374f472b8068/bjc2017375f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e965/5785737/5ed14b057e52/bjc2017375f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk-adjusted colorectal cancer screening using the FIT and routine screening data: development of a risk prediction model.基于 FIT 和常规筛查数据的风险调整结直肠癌筛查:风险预测模型的建立。
Br J Cancer. 2018 Jan;118(2):285-293. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.375. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
2
Combining risk factors with faecal immunochemical test outcome for selecting CRC screenees for colonoscopy.将风险因素与粪便免疫化学试验结果相结合,以选择接受结肠镜筛查的 CRC 筛查对象。
Gut. 2014 Mar;63(3):466-71. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305013. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
3
Increased uptake and improved outcomes of bowel cancer screening with a faecal immunochemical test: results from a pilot study within the national screening programme in England.粪便免疫化学试验增加结直肠癌筛查的检出率和改善结局:英格兰国家筛查计划中一项试点研究的结果。
Gut. 2017 Sep;66(9):1631-1644. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310691. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
4
Cost-effectiveness of the faecal immunochemical test at a range of positivity thresholds compared with the guaiac faecal occult blood test in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.在英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)肠癌筛查项目中,与愈创木脂粪便潜血试验相比,不同阳性阈值下粪便免疫化学检测的成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 27;7(10):e017186. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017186.
5
Seasonal variations do not affect the superiority of fecal immunochemical tests over guaiac tests for colorectal cancer screening.季节性变化并不影响粪便免疫化学检测在结直肠癌筛查中相对于愈创木脂法检测的优越性。
Int J Cancer. 2015 Apr 15;136(8):1827-34. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29187. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
6
Demand for Colonoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening Using a Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test and Age/Sex-Specific Thresholds for Test Positivity.定量粪便免疫化学试验和基于年龄/性别检测阳性阈值在结直肠癌筛查中对结肠镜检查的需求。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Jun;27(6):704-709. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0387. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
7
Faecal immunochemical tests versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests: what clinicians and colorectal cancer screening programme organisers need to know.粪便免疫化学试验与愈创木脂粪便潜血试验:临床医生和结直肠癌筛查计划组织者需要了解的内容。
Gut. 2015 Aug;64(8):1327-37. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308074. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
8
Interval Colorectal Cancer Incidence Among Subjects Undergoing Multiple Rounds of Fecal Immunochemical Testing.多次粪便免疫化学检测受试者的间期结直肠癌发病率。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Aug;153(2):439-447.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 5.
9
Superior diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin in a head-to-head comparison with guaiac based faecal occult blood test among 2235 participants of screening colonoscopy.在一项 2235 名筛查结肠镜参与者的头对头比较中,粪便免疫化学试验检测血红蛋白的诊断性能优于愈创木脂粪便隐血试验。
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Sep;49(14):3049-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.04.023. Epub 2013 May 22.
10
Lower risk of advanced neoplasia among patients with a previous negative result from a fecal test for colorectal cancer.粪便检测阴性的结直肠癌患者发生高级别腺瘤风险较低。
Gastroenterology. 2012 Mar;142(3):497-504. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.11.024. Epub 2011 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Colorectal Cancer Screening Based on Fecal Immunochemical Test and Risk Assessment: A Population-based Study Including Two Million Participants in China.基于粪便免疫化学检测和风险评估的结直肠癌筛查:一项纳入中国两百万参与者的基于人群的研究。
J Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 5;35(6):297-302. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20240252. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
2
Accuracy, Acceptability, and Application: Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Early Detection of Advanced Neoplasia in Colonoscopy-Based Surveillance.准确性、可接受性和应用:粪便免疫化学检测在结肠镜检查为基础的监测中对晚期肿瘤的早期检测。
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Jul;69(7):2621-2630. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08466-x. Epub 2024 May 16.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening.结直肠癌筛查的依从性:四轮基于粪便免疫化学检测的筛查
Br J Cancer. 2017 Jan 3;116(1):44-49. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.399. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
2
Faecal haemoglobin concentration is related to detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia in the next screening round.粪便血红蛋白浓度与下一轮筛查中晚期结直肠肿瘤的检测有关。
J Med Screen. 2017 Jun;24(2):62-68. doi: 10.1177/0969141316653983. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
3
Increased uptake and improved outcomes of bowel cancer screening with a faecal immunochemical test: results from a pilot study within the national screening programme in England.
Differences in treatment of stage I colorectal cancers: a population-based study of colorectal cancers detected within and outside of a screening program.
Ⅰ期结直肠癌的治疗差异:一项基于人群的结直肠癌筛查项目内外检出病例的研究。
Endoscopy. 2024 Jan;56(1):5-13. doi: 10.1055/a-2173-5989. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
4
Diagnostic yield of a risk model versus faecal immunochemical test only: a randomised controlled trial in a colorectal cancer screening programme.风险模型与粪便免疫化学检测单独应用的诊断效果:一项在结直肠癌筛查计划中的随机对照试验。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Sep;129(5):791-796. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02358-z. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
5
Improved use of faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin in the Scottish bowel screening programme.提高粪便免疫化学试验在苏格兰肠道筛查计划中检测血红蛋白的应用。
J Med Screen. 2023 Dec;30(4):184-190. doi: 10.1177/09691413231175611. Epub 2023 May 25.
6
Colorectal Cancer Risk Assessment and Precision Approaches to Screening: Brave New World or Worlds Apart?结直肠癌风险评估与精准筛查方法:崭新世界还是相去甚远?
Gastroenterology. 2023 Apr;164(5):812-827. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.02.021. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
7
Machine Learning in Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction from Routinely Collected Data: A Review.基于常规收集数据的机器学习在结直肠癌风险预测中的应用综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 13;13(2):301. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13020301.
8
Impact of time between faecal immunochemical tests in colorectal cancer screening on screening results: A natural experiment.粪便免疫化学试验在结直肠癌筛查中的时间间隔对筛查结果的影响:一项自然实验。
Int J Cancer. 2023 Apr 1;152(7):1414-1424. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34351. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
9
Colorectal Cancer Screening in China: Status, Challenges, and Prospects - China, 2022.中国的结直肠癌筛查:现状、挑战与前景 - 中国,2022年
China CDC Wkly. 2022 Apr 15;4(15):322-328. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2022.077.
10
A scoping review of risk-stratified bowel screening: current evidence, future directions.风险分层肠道筛查的范围综述:当前证据,未来方向。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 May;33(5):653-685. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01568-9. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
粪便免疫化学试验增加结直肠癌筛查的检出率和改善结局:英格兰国家筛查计划中一项试点研究的结果。
Gut. 2017 Sep;66(9):1631-1644. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310691. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
4
FIT for the future: a case for risk-based colorectal cancer screening using the faecal immunochemical test.为未来做好准备:基于风险的粪便免疫化学检测用于结直肠癌筛查的案例
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jul;18(7):650-3. doi: 10.1111/codi.13365.
5
Anticipating missing reference standard data when planning diagnostic accuracy studies.在规划诊断准确性研究时预测缺失的参考标准数据。
BMJ. 2016 Feb 9;352:i402. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i402.
6
A combination of clinical risk stratification and fecal immunochemical test results to prioritize colonoscopy screening in asymptomatic participants.将临床风险分层与粪便免疫化学检测结果相结合,以优先对无症状参与者进行结肠镜筛查。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):719-27. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.035.
7
Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement.个体预后或诊断多变量预测模型的透明报告(TRIPOD):TRIPOD声明
BMC Med. 2015 Jan 6;13:1. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z.
8
Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration.透明报告个体预后或诊断的多变量预测模型(TRIPOD):解释和说明。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):W1-73. doi: 10.7326/M14-0698.
9
Serum sCD26 for colorectal cancer screening in family-risk individuals: comparison with faecal immunochemical test.血清可溶性CD26用于有家族风险个体的结直肠癌筛查:与粪便免疫化学检测的比较
Br J Cancer. 2015 Jan 20;112(2):375-81. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.605. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
10
Optimising faecal occult blood screening:retrospective analysis of NHS Bowel Cancer Screening data to improve the screening algorithm.优化粪便潜血筛查:对英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)肠癌筛查数据进行回顾性分析以改进筛查算法。
Br J Cancer. 2014 Nov 25;111(11):2156-62. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.480. Epub 2014 Sep 16.