Hughes Patrick G, Brito Jose Cepeda, Ahmed Rami A
Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Division of Emergency Medicine, Florida US.
Summa Akron City Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medical Education, Ohio, US.
Can Med Educ J. 2017 Jun 30;8(3):e81-e89. eCollection 2017 Jun.
Coupled with the expansion of simulation has been the development and growth of medical simulation fellowships. These non-accredited fellowships do not have a standardized curriculum and there are currently no studies investigating the simulation fellowship experience. The purpose of this study was to explore the simulation fellowship experience of graduates throughout North America and how it prepared them for their post-fellowship career.
A web-based survey was developed by Emergency Medicine attending physicians both of whom completed one-year fellowships in medical simulation. Prior to distribution, the survey was reviewed and tested by three simulation fellowship graduates and a PhD researcher. Feedback was integrated into the survey prior to distribution. The survey consisted of a maximum of 29 multiple choice questions including two step-logic questions and two open response questions. The survey was distributed to simulation fellowship directors in multiple disciplines and the directors were asked to forward the survey to graduates. Additionally, the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Simulation Academy list-serve was utilized for distribution of the survey.
The survey had 35 responses. The majority of respondents completed fellowship within the last two years (66%, 23/35). Fellowship graduates strongly agreed or agreed that their fellowship adequately prepared them for their post-fellowship simulation career (88%). Graduates report that research design/reporting (53%) and administration (18%) were areas of their fellowship curriculum that needed the most improvement.
The majority of simulation fellowship graduates agreed that their fellowship experience adequately prepared them for their post-fellowship simulation career. Graduates also felt that training in research and administration are areas that could be improved.
随着模拟技术的扩展,医学模拟研究员培训项目也在发展和增加。这些未经认证的培训项目没有标准化的课程,目前也没有研究调查模拟研究员培训的经历。本研究的目的是探索北美各地模拟研究员培训毕业生的经历,以及培训如何使他们为培训后的职业生涯做好准备。
由急诊医学主治医师开发了一项基于网络的调查问卷,这两位医师都完成了为期一年的医学模拟研究员培训。在分发之前,该调查问卷由三名模拟研究员培训毕业生和一名博士研究员进行了审查和测试。在分发之前,反馈意见被纳入了调查问卷。该调查问卷最多包含29个多项选择题,包括两个分步逻辑问题和两个开放式回答问题。该调查问卷分发给多个学科的模拟研究员培训主任,并要求主任将调查问卷转发给毕业生。此外,学术急诊医学模拟学会的邮件列表也被用于分发调查问卷。
该调查问卷共收到35份回复。大多数受访者在过去两年内完成了研究员培训(66%,23/35)。研究员培训毕业生强烈同意或同意他们的培训使他们为培训后的模拟职业生涯做好了充分准备(88%)。毕业生报告说,研究设计/报告(53%)和管理(18%)是他们研究员培训课程中最需要改进的领域。
大多数模拟研究员培训毕业生认为他们的培训经历使他们为培训后的模拟职业生涯做好了充分准备。毕业生还认为研究和管理方面的培训是可以改进的领域。