Suppr超能文献

曲安奈德、5-氟尿嘧啶及其联合用药治疗瘢痕疙瘩的疗效比较。

Comparison of Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide, 5-Fluorouracil, and Their Combination for the Treatment of Keloids.

作者信息

Srivastava Sunil, Patil Aditya Nanasaheb, Prakash Chaitra, Kumari Hiranmayi

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Hospital, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur, India.

Department of Dermatology, Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Hospital, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur, India.

出版信息

Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2017 Nov 1;6(11):393-400. doi: 10.1089/wound.2017.0741.

Abstract

Despite the myriad options available, there is no universally accepted treatment for keloids. Our objective was to compare three regimens and establish superiority in terms of objective and subjective outcomes. In this randomized parallel group study, 60 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated to three groups. Patients received intralesional injections of triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) in Group TAC, 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in Group 5FU, and a combination in Group T + F every 3 weeks till 24 weeks or till the keloid resolved. There was a reduction in all parameters at every successive assessment in all three groups. Improvement in terms of height, vascularity, and pliability was fastest with 5FU, TAC, and T + F group, respectively, which was statistically significant. Decrease in pigmentation was significantly faster with T+F. Reduction in pruritus, however, was significantly faster with 5FU than the other groups, but the difference in reduction of pain among the three groups was not significant. Telangiectasias and skin atrophy were seen most commonly in TAC group, while skin ulceration was a common problem in 5FU group. TAC, 5FU, and their combination are all effective in keloid scars. A combination of TAC +5FU seems to offer the balanced benefit of faster and more efficacious response with lesser adverse effects when compared to individual drugs.

摘要

尽管有众多可用的治疗方法,但瘢痕疙瘩尚无普遍接受的治疗方案。我们的目的是比较三种治疗方案,并在客观和主观结果方面确定哪种方案更具优势。在这项随机平行组研究中,招募了60名患者并随机分配到三组。TAC组患者接受曲安奈德(TAC)皮损内注射,5FU组接受5-氟尿嘧啶(5FU)皮损内注射,T+F组接受两者联合注射,每3周一次,共24周或直至瘢痕疙瘩消退。在所有三组中,每次连续评估时所有参数均有所降低。在高度、血管化和柔韧性方面的改善,5FU组、TAC组和T+F组分别最快,且具有统计学意义。T+F组色素沉着的减轻明显更快。然而,5FU组瘙痒的减轻明显快于其他组,但三组之间疼痛减轻的差异不显著。毛细血管扩张和皮肤萎缩最常见于TAC组,而皮肤溃疡是5FU组的常见问题。TAC、5FU及其联合治疗对瘢痕疙瘩均有效。与单独使用药物相比,TAC+5FU联合使用似乎能提供更快、更有效的反应以及更少不良反应的平衡益处。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Frontal fibrosing alopecia: efficacy of treatment modalities.额部纤维性秃发:治疗方式的疗效
Int J Womens Health. 2019 Apr 29;11:273-285. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S177308. eCollection 2019.
8
Dose Effect in Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Resected Keloids.辅助放疗治疗切除后瘢痕疙瘩的剂量效应。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Sep 1;102(1):149-154. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.027. Epub 2018 May 17.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验