Suppr超能文献

瘢痕疙瘩治疗:最新进展的循证系统评价。

Keloid treatments: an evidence-based systematic review of recent advances.

机构信息

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;12(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02192-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Keloids are pathologic scars that pose a significant functional and cosmetic burden. They are challenging to treat, despite the multitude of treatment modalities currently available.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to conduct an evidence-based review of all prospective data regarding keloid treatments published between 2010 and 2020.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of PubMed (National Library of Medicine), Embase (Elsevier), and Cochrane Library (Wiley) was performed in November of 2020. Search strategies with the keywords "keloid" and "treatment" were performed by a medical librarian. The search was limited to prospective studies that were peer-reviewed, reported on clinical outcomes of keloid therapies, and were published in the English language between January 1, 2010, and November 24, 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 3462 unique citations were identified, of which 108 studies met inclusion criteria. Current literature supports silicone gel or sheeting with corticosteroid injections as first-line therapy for keloids. Adjuvant intralesional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), bleomycin, or verapamil can be considered, although mixed results have been reported with each. Laser therapy can be used in combination with intralesional corticosteroids or topical steroids with occlusion to improve drug penetration. Excision of keloids with immediate post-excision radiation therapy is an effective option for recalcitrant lesions. Finally, silicone sheeting and pressure therapy have evidence for reducing keloid recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

This review was limited by heterogeneity of subject characteristics and study outcome measures, small sample sizes, and inconsistent study designs. Larger and more robust controlled studies are necessary to further understand the variety of existing and emerging keloid treatments, including corticosteroids, cryotherapy, intralesional injections, lasers, photodynamic therapy, excision and radiation, pressure dressings, and others.

摘要

背景

瘢痕疙瘩是一种病理性瘢痕,给患者带来了显著的功能和美容负担。尽管目前有多种治疗方法,但治疗仍具有挑战性。

目的

本研究旨在对 2010 年至 2020 年间发表的所有关于瘢痕疙瘩治疗的前瞻性数据进行基于证据的综述。

方法

于 2020 年 11 月在 PubMed(美国国立医学图书馆)、Embase(爱思唯尔)和 Cochrane Library(Wiley)进行了系统文献检索。由一名医学图书管理员使用关键词“瘢痕疙瘩”和“治疗”进行检索策略。检索仅限于同行评议的前瞻性研究,这些研究报告了瘢痕疙瘩治疗的临床结果,并于 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 11 月 24 日期间以英文发表。

结果

共确定了 3462 条独特的引文,其中 108 项研究符合纳入标准。目前的文献支持硅凝胶或皮质类固醇注射作为瘢痕疙瘩的一线治疗。辅助局部注射 5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)、博来霉素或维拉帕米也可以考虑,尽管每种方法的结果都不一致。激光治疗可与局部皮质类固醇或局部类固醇封闭联合使用,以提高药物渗透。对于难治性病变,切除瘢痕疙瘩后立即进行放射治疗是一种有效的选择。最后,硅酮片和压力治疗有减少瘢痕疙瘩复发的证据。

结论

本综述受到研究对象特征和研究结果衡量标准、样本量小以及研究设计不一致的限制。需要更大和更稳健的对照研究来进一步了解现有的和新兴的瘢痕疙瘩治疗方法,包括皮质类固醇、冷冻疗法、局部注射、激光、光动力疗法、切除和放射治疗、压力敷料和其他方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98cb/10012475/4bee423c461d/13643_2023_2192_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验