• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一家三级保健医院识别无症状携带者。

Identification of Asymptomatic Carriers in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

机构信息

Clinical Laboratory, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Division of Medical Practice, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:5450829. doi: 10.1155/2017/5450829. Epub 2017 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1155/2017/5450829
PMID:29098156
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5643058/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of infection (CDI) increases concern that asymptomatic carriers of toxigenic may be diagnosed with CDI.

METHODS

A matched case control study was conducted in inpatients in a tertiary care center. The first 50 patients with diarrhea and a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test beginning February 1, 2015, were identified as cases. Control patients were hospitalized patients receiving antibiotics, but with no diarrhea, housed in a room as close as possible to each case during the same admission time. A convenience sample of healthcare workers who cared for infected patients was also tested.

RESULTS

We found two positive PCR results for in controls (4.1%). None of these healthcare workers were positive for by PCR. There was no difference between groups with respect to overall antibiotic use before the requested PCR for ( = 0.359). The majority of cases had a high proportion of gastrointestinal disorders (71.4%) compared with control (8.2%), < 0.001. Patients with neoplasia had a higher chance of being identified as cases ( = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

PCR should not be the only diagnostic tool but should be complementary to other methods and to the medical history.

摘要

背景

感染(CDI)的诊断增加了对可能被诊断为 CDI 的产毒 无症状携带者的关注。

方法

在一家三级保健中心对住院患者进行了匹配的病例对照研究。2015 年 2 月 1 日起,将第 50 位出现腹泻和聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测阳性的患者确定为病例。对照患者为接受抗生素治疗但无腹泻的住院患者,与同一入院时间内的每个病例尽可能住在同一病房。还对照顾 感染患者的医护人员进行了方便抽样检测。

结果

我们在对照组中发现了两个阳性的 PCR 结果(4.1%)。这些医护人员中没有人通过 PCR 检测出 。在请求进行 PCR 检测 之前,两组患者的总体抗生素使用情况无差异( = 0.359)。与对照组(8.2%)相比,大多数病例有较高比例的胃肠道疾病(71.4%),差异具有统计学意义( <0.001)。患有肿瘤的患者更有可能被确定为病例( = 0.041)。

结论

PCR 不应是唯一的诊断工具,而应与其他方法和病史互补。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acce/5643058/22170769f0e6/BMRI2017-5450829.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acce/5643058/22170769f0e6/BMRI2017-5450829.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acce/5643058/22170769f0e6/BMRI2017-5450829.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Identification of Asymptomatic Carriers in a Tertiary Care Hospital.在一家三级保健医院识别无症状携带者。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:5450829. doi: 10.1155/2017/5450829. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
2
Clinical characteristics of Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea in a university hospital in China.中国某大学医院抗生素相关性腹泻住院患者艰难梭菌感染的临床特征
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Oct;33(10):1773-9. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2132-9. Epub 2014 May 13.
3
BaiCD gene cluster abundance is negatively correlated with Clostridium difficile infection.BaiCD 基因簇丰度与艰难梭菌感染呈负相关。
PLoS One. 2018 May 8;13(5):e0196977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196977. eCollection 2018.
4
Clinical predictors of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection in out-patients.门诊患者复发性艰难梭菌感染的临床预测因素
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Sep;40(5):518-22. doi: 10.1111/apt.12864. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
5
Environmental shedding of toxigenic Clostridioides difficile by asymptomatic carriers: A prospective observational study.无症状携带者中产毒艰难梭菌的环境脱落:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Aug;26(8):1052-1057. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.12.011. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
6
Toxigenic -mediated diarrhoea in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in-patients: rapid diagnosis and efficient treatment.造血干细胞移植住院患者的产毒介导性腹泻:快速诊断和有效治疗。
Epidemiol Infect. 2021 Aug 10;149:e250. doi: 10.1017/S095026882100162X.
7
Clostridium difficile infection in children hospitalized due to diarrhea.儿童因腹泻住院时的艰难梭菌感染。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Feb;33(2):201-9. doi: 10.1007/s10096-013-1946-1. Epub 2013 Nov 10.
8
Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals the High Nosocomial Transmission and Antimicrobial Resistance of Clostridioides difficile in a Single Center in China, a Four-Year Retrospective Study.全基因组测序揭示中国单中心艰难梭菌的高医院内传播和耐药性:一项四年回顾性研究。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0132221. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01322-21. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
9
Prevalence and risk factors for asymptomatic Clostridium difficile carriage.无症状艰难梭菌携带的患病率及危险因素
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 15;59(2):216-22. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu258. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
10
Use of multilocus variable number of tandem repeats analysis genotyping to determine the role of asymptomatic carriers in Clostridium difficile transmission.应用多位点可变串联重复分析基因分型技术来确定无症状携带者在艰难梭菌传播中的作用。
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Oct;57(8):1094-102. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit475. Epub 2013 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic performance of a multiplexed gastrointestinal PCR panel for identifying diarrheal pathogens in children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant.用于鉴定行造血干细胞移植的儿童腹泻病原体的多重胃肠道 PCR 面板的诊断性能。
World J Pediatr. 2024 Sep;20(9):966-975. doi: 10.1007/s12519-023-00776-w. Epub 2024 Feb 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Rising Stakes for Health Care-Associated Infection Prevention: Implications for the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory.医疗保健相关感染预防的风险不断增加:对临床微生物实验室的影响
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Apr;55(4):996-1001. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02544-16. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
2
Inappropriate Clostridium difficile Testing and Consequent Overtreatment and Inaccurate Publicly Reported Metrics.艰难梭菌检测不当、随之而来的过度治疗以及公开报告的指标不准确。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;37(12):1395-1400. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.210. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
3
Response to Prior and Fitzpatrick.
对普赖尔和菲茨帕特里克的回应。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Mar;37(3):362-3. doi: 10.1017/ice.2015.338.
4
Clostridium difficile--To Test or Not to Test? Response to Kundrapu et al.艰难梭菌——检测还是不检测?对昆德拉普等人的回应
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Mar;37(3):361-2. doi: 10.1017/ice.2015.315.
5
Overdiagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection in the Molecular Test Era.分子检测时代艰难梭菌感染的过度诊断
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1792-801. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4114.
6
Real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of asymptomatic Clostridium difficile colonization and rising C. difficile-associated disease rates.实时聚合酶链反应检测无症状艰难梭菌定植及艰难梭菌相关疾病发病率上升
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;35(6):667-73. doi: 10.1086/676433. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
7
Strategies to prevent Clostridium difficile infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 Update.急性护理医院预防艰难梭菌感染的策略:2014年更新版
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;35(6):628-45. doi: 10.1086/676023.
8
Differences in outcome according to Clostridium difficile testing method: a prospective multicentre diagnostic validation study of C difficile infection.根据艰难梭菌检测方法的结果差异:艰难梭菌感染的前瞻性多中心诊断验证研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Nov;13(11):936-45. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70200-7. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
9
Effect of nucleic acid amplification testing on population-based incidence rates of Clostridium difficile infection.核酸扩增检测对基于人群的艰难梭菌感染发病率的影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Nov;57(9):1304-7. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit492. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
10
Clinical relevance of a positive molecular test in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.分子检测阳性对艰难梭菌感染诊断的临床意义。
J Hosp Infect. 2013 Aug;84(4):311-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Jul 5.