J Neurosurg. 2018 Sep;129(3):711-717. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.JNS17394. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
OBJECTIVE Overlapping surgery is a controversial subject in medicine today; however, few studies have examined the outcomes of this practice. The authors analyzed outcomes of patients with acutely ruptured saccular aneurysms who were treated with microsurgical clipping in a prospectively collected database from the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. Acute and long-term outcomes for overlapping versus nonoverlapping cases were compared. METHODS During the study period, 241 patients with ruptured saccular aneurysms underwent microsurgical clipping. Patients were separated into overlapping (n = 123) and nonoverlapping (n = 118) groups based on surgical start/stop times. Outcomes at discharge and at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 6 years after surgery were analyzed. RESULTS Patient variables (e.g., age, smoking status, cardiovascular history, Hunt and Hess grade, Fisher grade, and aneurysm size) were similar between the 2 groups. Aneurysm locations were similar, with the exception of the overlapping group having more posterior circulation aneurysms (18/123 [15%]) than the nonoverlapping group (8/118 [7%]) (p = 0.0495). Confirmed aneurysm obliteration at discharge was significantly higher for the overlapping group (109/119 [91.6%]) than for the nonoverlapping group (95/116 [81.9%]) (p = 0.03). Hospital length of stay, discharge location, and proportions of patients with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score > 2 at discharge and up to 6 years postoperatively were similar. The mean and median mRS, Glasgow Outcome Scale, Mini-Mental State Examination, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and Barthel Index scores at all time points were not statistically different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Compared with nonoverlapping surgery, overlapping surgery was not associated with worse outcomes for any variable at any time point, despite the complexity of the surgical management in this patient population. These findings should be considered during the discussion of future guidelines on the practice of overlapping surgery.
目的
重叠手术在当今医学领域是一个备受争议的话题;然而,很少有研究探讨这种手术的结果。作者分析了前瞻性收集的巴罗破裂动脉瘤试验数据库中接受显微夹闭治疗的急性破裂囊状动脉瘤患者的结果。比较了重叠病例和非重叠病例的急性和长期结果。
方法
在研究期间,241 例破裂囊状动脉瘤患者接受了显微夹闭术。根据手术开始/停止时间,患者被分为重叠组(n=123)和非重叠组(n=118)。分析了术后出院时以及术后 6 个月、1 年、3 年和 6 年的结果。
结果
两组患者的变量(如年龄、吸烟状况、心血管病史、Hunt 和 Hess 分级、Fisher 分级和动脉瘤大小)相似。动脉瘤位置相似,除了重叠组后循环动脉瘤(18/123[15%])多于非重叠组(8/118[7%])(p=0.0495)。重叠组出院时确认的动脉瘤闭塞率(109/119[91.6%])显著高于非重叠组(95/116[81.9%])(p=0.03)。出院时的住院时间、出院地点以及出院后至 6 年内改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分>2 的患者比例相似。两组在所有时间点的平均和中位数 mRS、格拉斯哥结局量表、简易精神状态检查、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表和巴氏指数评分均无统计学差异。
结论
与非重叠手术相比,重叠手术在任何时间点的任何变量上都没有导致更差的结果,尽管在这群患者中手术管理更为复杂。在讨论重叠手术实践的未来指南时,应考虑这些发现。