Suppr超能文献

确定颈椎前路融合术的参考手术时长:标准在手术流程改进中的作用。

Establishing a Reference Procedure Length for Anterior Cervical Fusions: The Role for Standards in Surgical Process Improvement.

作者信息

Bohl Michael, Kakarla Udaya K, Chang Steve W, Sethi Rajiv, Farrokhi Farrokh, Leveque Jean-Christophe

机构信息

Neurosurgery, Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Charlotte, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Feb 25;14(2):e22615. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22615. eCollection 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Surgical process improvement strategies are increasingly being applied to specific procedures to improve value. A critical step in any process improvement strategy is the identification of performance benchmarks. Procedure length is a performance benchmark for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures; therefore, we sought to establish reference procedure lengths for 1-level, 2-level, and 3-level ACDFs at both teaching and non-teaching institutions and to describe methods for using this information to advance surgical process improvement initiatives. We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive ACDFs performed at a resident teaching institution (RT) and a non-teaching institution (NT) for all 1-level, 2-level, and 3-level ACDFs. Mean case lengths and patient outcomes were calculated for individual surgeons and institutions. After limiting cases to 1-level, 2-level, and 3-level ACDFs and applying all exclusion criteria, 991 cases at the RT institution and 131 cases at the NT institution (a total of 1122 cases) were available for analysis. The mean (SD) procedure length for 1-level, 2-level, and 3-level ACDFs at the RT versus NT institutions were 121.9 min (36.3 min) and 73.6 min (29.7 min) (p<0.001), 172.7 min (44.8 min) and 112.0 min (43.0 min) (p<0.001), and 218.3 min (54.9 min) and 167.6 min (54.2 min) (p<0.001), respectively. Thirty-day outcomes were the same between institutions, except that the RT institution had a shorter mean hospital length of stay for 2-level ACDFs (1.6 days versus 2.9 days, p=0.001). This study is the first to attempt to establish a standard reference procedure length for 1-level, 2-level, and 3-level ACDFs. These data can guide efforts in surgical process improvement.

摘要

手术流程改进策略正越来越多地应用于特定手术以提高价值。任何流程改进策略的关键步骤都是确定性能基准。手术时长是颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)的一项性能基准;因此,我们试图在教学机构和非教学机构建立1节段、2节段和3节段ACDF的参考手术时长,并描述利用这些信息推进手术流程改进计划的方法。我们对一家住院医师教学机构(RT)和一家非教学机构(NT)进行的所有1节段、2节段和3节段ACDF连续病例进行了回顾性分析。计算了各个外科医生和机构的平均病例时长及患者预后。在将病例限制为1节段、2节段和3节段ACDF并应用所有排除标准后,RT机构有991例病例、NT机构有131例病例(共1122例病例)可供分析。RT机构与NT机构1节段、2节段和3节段ACDF的平均(标准差)手术时长分别为121.9分钟(36.3分钟)和73.6分钟(29.7分钟)(p<0.001)、172.7分钟(44.8分钟)和112.0分钟(43.0分钟)(p<0.001)、218.3分钟(54.9分钟)和167.6分钟(54.2分钟)(p<0.001)。机构间30天预后相同,但RT机构2节段ACDF的平均住院时长较短(1.6天对2.9天,p = 0.001)。本研究首次尝试为1节段、2节段和3节段ACDF建立标准参考手术时长。这些数据可指导手术流程改进工作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b62/8958152/7735e0eebc71/cureus-0014-00000022615-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验