• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扁平上皮异型增生:升级率及风险分层方法以支持明智决策

Flat Epithelial Atypia: Upgrade Rates and Risk-Stratification Approach to Support Informed Decision Making.

作者信息

Lamb Leslie R, Bahl Manisha, Gadd Michele A, Lehman Constance D

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Dec;225(6):696-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.08.022. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.08.022
PMID:29100673
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to determine upgrade rates of pure flat epithelial atypia (FEA) to malignancy and higher-risk lesions and to identify patients with FEA at low risk for upgrade.

STUDY DESIGN

Medical chart review from 2007 to 2016 identified 208 consecutive patients with pure FEA diagnosed by image-guided core needle biopsy who underwent surgical excision (96.2% [200 of 208]) or had at least 2 years of imaging follow-up (3.8% [8 of 208]). Medical records were reviewed for risk factors and surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall upgrade rate of FEA to malignancy was 2.4% (5 of 208). All 5 upgraded cases were ductal carcinoma in situ at operation. The upgrade rate to atypical ductal hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ, or atypical lobular hyperplasia was 29.8% (62 of 208). The FEA lesions in patients with a genetic mutation were more likely to upgrade to malignancy than FEA lesions in patients without a genetic mutation (33.3% [1 of 3] vs 2.0% [4 of 205]; p < 0.01). The FEA lesions in patients with a personal history of breast cancer were more likely to upgrade to higher-risk lesions than those without a personal history (47.8% [11 of 23] vs 27.6% [51 of 185]; p = 0.046) but were not more likely to be upgraded to malignancy (0% [0 of 23] vs 2.7% [5 of 185]; p = 0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall risk of upgrade of FEA to malignancy is low at 2.4%; however, the upgrade rate to a higher-risk lesion is nearly 30%. Surveillance rather than surgical excision of FEA can be a reasonable option for patients without a genetic mutation who opt against chemoprevention.

摘要

背景

我们的目的是确定单纯扁平上皮异型增生(FEA)进展为恶性肿瘤及更高风险病变的升级率,并识别FEA升级风险较低的患者。

研究设计

回顾2007年至2016年的病历,确定208例经影像引导下粗针穿刺活检诊断为单纯FEA的连续患者,这些患者接受了手术切除(96.2%[208例中的200例])或至少有2年的影像随访(3.8%[208例中的8例])。审查病历以了解风险因素和手术结果。

结果

FEA进展为恶性肿瘤的总体升级率为2.4%(208例中的5例)。所有5例升级病例在手术时均为导管原位癌。进展为非典型导管增生、小叶原位癌或非典型小叶增生的升级率为29.8%(208例中的62例)。有基因突变的患者的FEA病变比没有基因突变的患者的FEA病变更有可能进展为恶性肿瘤(33.3%[3例中的1例]对2.0%[205例中的4例];p<0.01)。有乳腺癌个人史的患者的FEA病变比没有乳腺癌个人史的患者的FEA病变更有可能进展为更高风险的病变(47.8%[23例中的11例]对27.6%[185例中的51例];p=0.046),但进展为恶性肿瘤的可能性并无增加(0%[23例中的0例]对2.7%[185例中的5例];p=0.42)。

结论

FEA进展为恶性肿瘤的总体风险较低,为2.4%;然而,进展为更高风险病变的升级率近30%。对于不选择化学预防的无基因突变患者,对FEA进行监测而非手术切除可能是一个合理的选择。

相似文献

1
Flat Epithelial Atypia: Upgrade Rates and Risk-Stratification Approach to Support Informed Decision Making.扁平上皮异型增生:升级率及风险分层方法以支持明智决策
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Dec;225(6):696-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.08.022. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
2
Rates of upgrade to malignancy for 271 cases of flat epithelial atypia (FEA) diagnosed by breast core biopsy.271 例乳腺核心活检诊断为平坦上皮不典型性(FEA)的恶变升级率。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jun;133(2):659-66. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1839-x. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
3
Flat epithelial atypia: are we being too aggressive?平坦上皮不典型增生:我们是否过于激进?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan;179(2):511-517. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05481-9. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
4
Magnetic resonance imaging-guided core needle breast biopsies resulting in high-risk histopathologic findings: upstage frequency and lesion characteristics.磁共振成像引导下的乳腺粗针活检导致高危组织病理学结果:分期上调频率和病变特征。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2015 Jun;15(3):234-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2014.12.005. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
5
Significance of flat epithelial atypia on mammotome core needle biopsy: Should it be excised?乳腺旋切针芯活检中扁平上皮异型增生的意义:是否应将其切除?
Hum Pathol. 2007 Jan;38(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.08.008. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
6
Surgical excision of pure flat epithelial atypia identified on core needle breast biopsy.对在乳腺粗针活检中发现的单纯扁平上皮异型增生进行手术切除。
Breast. 2014 Aug;23(4):352-6. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 Feb 8.
7
Is the outcome at surgery different when flat epithelial atypia and lobular neoplasia are found in association at biopsy?活检时发现扁平上皮异型增生和小叶瘤变同时存在,手术结果会有所不同吗?
Br J Radiol. 2017 Apr;90(1072):20160750. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160750. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
8
Majority of flat epithelial atypia diagnosed on biopsy do not require surgical excision.大多数在活检中诊断出的平坦上皮异型增生不需要手术切除。
Breast. 2018 Feb;37:13-17. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
9
Incidence of breast cancer in patients with pure flat epithelial atypia diagnosed at core-needle biopsy of the breast.乳腺空芯针穿刺活检诊断为单纯平坦上皮不典型增生患者的乳腺癌发病率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jan;20(1):133-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2591-0. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
10
Diagnostic terminology used to describe atypia on breast core needle biopsy: correlation with excision and upgrade rates.用于描述乳腺芯针活检中非典型性的诊断术语:与切除和升级率的相关性。
Diagn Pathol. 2019 Jun 29;14(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13000-019-0842-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence of Adjacent Synchronous Ipsilateral Infiltrating Carcinoma and/or Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Patients Diagnosed with Flat Epithelial Atypia by Core Needle Biopsy (TBCRC 034).经粗针活检诊断为扁平上皮异型增生的患者中,相邻同步同侧浸润性癌和/或导管原位癌的发病率(TBCRC 034)。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;32(4):2578-2584. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16762-z. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
2
Prevalence, Impact, and Diagnostic Challenges of Benign Breast Disease: A Narrative Review.良性乳腺疾病的患病率、影响及诊断挑战:一项叙述性综述
Int J Womens Health. 2023 May 18;15:765-778. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S351095. eCollection 2023.
3
Are Columnar Cell Lesions the Earliest Non-Obligate Precursor in the Low-Grade Breast Neoplasia Pathway?
柱状细胞病变是否是低级别乳腺肿瘤通路中最早的非必需前体?
Curr Oncol. 2022 Aug 11;29(8):5664-5681. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29080447.
4
Machine learning-based image analysis for accelerating the diagnosis of complicated preneoplastic and neoplastic ductal lesions in breast biopsy tissues.基于机器学习的图像分析加速乳腺活检组织中复杂的癌前和肿瘤性导管病变的诊断。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Aug;188(3):649-659. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06243-2. Epub 2021 May 1.
5
Upgrade Rate of Pure Flat Epithelial Atypia Diagnosed at Core Needle Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在核心针活检中诊断为单纯平坦上皮不典型性的升级率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2021 Jan 22;3(1):e200116. doi: 10.1148/rycan.2021200116. eCollection 2021 Jan.
6
Performance of a clinical and imaging-based multivariate model as decision support tool to help save unnecessary surgeries for high-risk breast lesions.基于临床和影像学的多变量模型作为决策支持工具的性能,有助于避免高危乳腺病变的不必要手术。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jan;185(2):479-494. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05947-1. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
7
Flat Epithelial Atypia in Breast Core Needle Biopsies With Radiologic-Pathologic Concordance: Is Excision Necessary?乳腺芯针活检中与影像学-病理学一致的平坦上皮不典型性:是否需要切除?
Am J Surg Pathol. 2020 Feb;44(2):182-190. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001385.
8
Breast lesions with atypia in percutaneous biopsies, managed with surgery in the last 10 years.过去10年中,经皮活检有非典型性的乳腺病变,采用手术治疗。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2019 Apr 11;13:923. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.923. eCollection 2019.
9
Second International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions).第二届乳腺交界性病变(B3 病变)国际专家共识会议。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Apr;174(2):279-296. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-05071-1. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
10
High risk breast lesions identified on MRI-guided vacuum-assisted needle biopsy: outcome of surgical excision and imaging follow-up.磁共振成像(MRI)引导下真空辅助针吸活检发现的高风险乳腺病变:手术切除及影像随访结果
Br J Radiol. 2018 Oct;91(1090):20180300. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180300. Epub 2018 Jul 5.