• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不复苏医嘱(DNAR):了解和解释其在爱尔兰住院患者中的使用。简要报告。

Do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) orders: understanding and interpretation of their use in the hospitalised patient in Ireland. A brief report.

机构信息

Department of Medical Gerontology, Mercer's Institute for Successful Ageing, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2018 Mar;44(3):201-203. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103986. Epub 2017 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2016-103986
PMID:29101301
Abstract

Following the introduction of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders in the 1970s, there was widespread misinterpretation of the term among healthcare professionals. In this brief report, we present findings from a survey of healthcare professionals. Our aim was to examine current understanding of the term do-not-attempt-resuscitate (DNAR), decision-making surrounding DNAR and awareness of current guidelines. The survey was distributed to doctors and nurses in a university teaching hospital and affiliated primary care physicians in Dublin via email and by hard copy at educational meetings from July to December 2014. A total of 519 completed the survey. The response rate in the hospital doctors group was 35.5% (187/527), 19.8% (292/1477) in the nurses group but 68.8% (150/218) in the specialist nurses group and 40% (40/100) in the primary care physician group.Alarmingly, our results demonstrate that 26.8% of staff nurses and 30% of primary care physicians surveyed believed that a patient with a DNAR order could not receive any/at least one of a list of simple treatments including antibiotics, physiotherapy, intravenous fluids, pain relief, oxygen, nasogastric feeding or airway suctioning, which were higher percentages compared to the other hospital doctors and experienced nurses groups with statistically significant differences (p<0.001). Furthermore, a higher percentage of staff nurses (26.8%) and primary care physicians (22.5%) believed that a patient with a DNAR order could not be referred to hospital from home/a nursing home, when compared with other healthcare groups (p<0.001). Our findings highlight continued misunderstanding and over-interpretation of DNAR orders. Further collaboration and information is required for meaningful Advance Care Plans.

摘要

自 20 世纪 70 年代引入“不复苏”(Do Not Resuscitate,DNR)医嘱以来,医护人员对此术语存在广泛的误解。在本简要报告中,我们呈现了一项针对医护人员的调查结果。我们的目的是检查当前对“不尝试复苏”(Do Not Attempt Resuscitation,DNAR)这一术语的理解、围绕 DNAR 的决策以及对当前指南的认知。该调查于 2014 年 7 月至 12 月期间,通过电子邮件和教育会议的纸质版分发给都柏林一家大学教学医院的医生和护士以及附属初级保健医生。共有 519 人完成了调查。在医院医生组中的回应率为 35.5%(187/527),护士组为 19.8%(292/1477),但专科护士组为 68.8%(150/218),初级保健医生组为 40%(40/100)。令人震惊的是,我们的结果表明,接受调查的 26.8%的护士和 30%的初级保健医生认为,有 DNR 医嘱的患者不能接受包括抗生素、物理治疗、静脉输液、止痛、吸氧、鼻胃管喂养或气道抽吸等简单治疗中的任何一种/至少一种,这比其他医院医生和经验丰富的护士群体的比例更高,且存在统计学显著差异(p<0.001)。此外,与其他医疗保健群体相比,更多的护士(26.8%)和初级保健医生(22.5%)认为,有 DNR 医嘱的患者不能从家中/疗养院转至医院,(p<0.001)。我们的发现强调了对 DNR 医嘱的持续误解和过度解读。需要进一步合作和信息交流,以制定有意义的预嘱。

相似文献

1
Do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) orders: understanding and interpretation of their use in the hospitalised patient in Ireland. A brief report.不复苏医嘱(DNAR):了解和解释其在爱尔兰住院患者中的使用。简要报告。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Mar;44(3):201-203. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103986. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
2
Interpretation and intent: a study of the (mis)understanding of DNAR orders in a teaching hospital.解读与意图:教学医院中对 DNAR 医嘱的(误解)的研究。
Resuscitation. 2010 Sep;81(9):1138-41. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.05.014. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
3
'Do not attempt resuscitation' and 'cardiopulmonary resuscitation' in an inpatient setting: factors influencing physicians' decisions in Switzerland.“不要在住院环境中进行复苏”和“心肺复苏”:影响瑞士医生决策的因素。
Gerontology. 2011;57(5):414-21. doi: 10.1159/000319422. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
4
Implementing a resuscitation policy for patients at the end of life in an acute hospital setting: qualitative study.在急性医院环境中为临终患者实施复苏政策:定性研究
Palliat Med. 2007 Jun;21(4):305-12. doi: 10.1177/0269216307077817.
5
Staff awareness of a 'Do Not Attempt Resuscitation' policy in a District General Hospital.地区综合医院工作人员对“不要尝试心肺复苏”政策的认知情况。
Resuscitation. 2005 May;65(2):159-63. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.11.019. Epub 2005 Jan 15.
6
Dissatisfaction with Do Not Attempt Resuscitation Orders: A nationwide study of Irish consultant physician practices.对“不要尝试心肺复苏”医嘱的不满:一项针对爱尔兰顾问医师实践的全国性研究。
Ir Med J. 2006 Jul-Aug;99(7):208-10.
7
"Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation"-orders in ICCUs: a survey of attitudes and experiences of nurses in Norway.重症冠心病监护病房中的“不要尝试心肺复苏”医嘱:挪威护士的态度与经历调查
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2009 Jun;25(3):140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2008.05.001. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
8
Attitudes towards do-not-resuscitate decisions: differences among health professionals in a Portuguese hospital.对不进行心肺复苏决定的态度:葡萄牙一家医院医护人员之间的差异。
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Mar;27(3):555-8. doi: 10.1007/s001340100852.
9
Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation orders for people with intellectual disabilities: dilemmas and uncertainties for ID physicians and trainees. The importance of the deliberation process.为智障人士制定的不要尝试心肺复苏指令:智障医生和实习生面临的困境与不确定性。审议过程的重要性。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2017 Mar;61(3):245-254. doi: 10.1111/jir.12333. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
10
Problems Experienced by Health Care Professionals with Do not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) Orders - A Qualitative Study.医护人员在执行不复苏医嘱(DNAR)方面遇到的问题 - 一项定性研究。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 Oct 20;309:233-237. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230785.

引用本文的文献

1
Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation practice and policy in Ireland: a mixed-methods study of service user and advocacy group perspectives.爱尔兰的心肺复苏实践与政策:一项关于服务使用者和倡导团体观点的混合方法研究
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Apr 4;23(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01315-x.
2
A survey study of healthcare workers on do not Attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation practice and policy in Ireland.一项关于爱尔兰医护人员对不进行心肺复苏操作及政策的调查研究。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Oct 17;20:100799. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100799. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision-making process: scoping review.
不尝试进行心肺复苏的决策过程:范围综述
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2025 Apr 30;15(3):400-410. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004573.
4
Perceptions and experiences of community-based healthcare professionals in the state of Qatar having do not attempt resuscitation discussions during the COVID-19 pandemic.卡塔尔国社区医疗保健专业人员在新冠疫情期间进行“不尝试心肺复苏”讨论的认知与经历。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Dec 14;10:1232954. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1232954. eCollection 2023.
5
Moving Towards 'Goals of Care' Plans for all Hospital Inpatients.为所有住院患者制定“护理目标”计划
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2021 Oct 23;7:23337214211046085. doi: 10.1177/23337214211046085. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
6
Do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders: attitudes, perceptions and practices of Swedish physicians and nurses.不进行心肺复苏医嘱:瑞典医生和护士的态度、认知与实践
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 30;22(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00604-8.
7
Usage of do-not-attempt-to-resuscitate orders in a Swedish community hospital - patient involvement, documentation and compliance.瑞典一家社区医院中“不要尝试心肺复苏”医嘱的使用——患者参与、记录与依从性
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Aug 1;21(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00510-5.
8
What's in a Do-Not-Resuscitate Order? Understanding the Impact on Pre-arrest Life Support and Factors Influencing Misconceptions.“不要复苏”医嘱包含什么?了解其对心脏骤停前生命支持的影响以及影响误解的因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1920-1922. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05431-7. Epub 2019 Oct 17.