• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

飞秒激光小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)和准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)术后角膜生物力学变化及组织重塑

Corneal Biomechanical Changes and Tissue Remodeling After SMILE and LASIK.

作者信息

Shetty Rohit, Francis Mathew, Shroff Rushad, Pahuja Natasha, Khamar Pooja, Girrish Molleti, Nuijts Rudy M M A, Sinha Roy Abhijit

机构信息

Cornea and Refractive Surgery Division, Narayana Nethralaya, Bommansandra, Bangalore, India.

Imaging, Biomechanics and Mathematical Modeling Solutions (IBMS) Lab, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, India.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Nov 1;58(13):5703-5712. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22864.

DOI:10.1167/iovs.17-22864
PMID:29101408
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate transient corneal tissue healing and biomechanical changes between laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) eyes.

METHODS

In each patient, one eye underwent LASIK and the other underwent SMILE. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and dynamic Scheimpflug imaging (Corvis-ST) was used to assess tissue healing and biomechanics, respectively. Analyses of OCT scans yielded corneal speckle distribution (CSD) and Bowman's roughness index (BRI). Waveform analyses of deformation amplitude yielded corneal stiffness. Further, corneal force versus corneal deformation data helped compare the two procedures.

RESULTS

BRI increased and then decreased transiently after both treatments (P < 0.05). However, SMILE eyes had BRI similar to that of their preoperative state compared to LASIK eyes at 6-month follow-up. CSD indicated a marked increase in the number of bright pixels and a decrease in the number of dark pixels after SMILE (1-month follow-up) and LASIK eyes (3-month follow-up), respectively. CSD returned to near preoperative state thereafter, respectively. Corneal stiffness change from preoperative state was similar between LASIK and SMILE eyes. However, deformation at discrete values of corneal force indicated some recovery of biomechanical strength after SMILE, but not in LASIK eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

BRI and CSD indicated earlier tissue healing in SMILE eyes than in LASIK. CSD results may indicate delayed cell death in LASIK eyes and increased light scatter due to interface fluid in SMILE eyes. Corneal biomechanical strength remodeled better in SMILE. This may indicate some hydration-related recovery.

摘要

目的

评估准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)和小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)术后角膜组织的瞬时愈合情况及生物力学变化。

方法

每位患者的一只眼睛接受LASIK手术,另一只眼睛接受SMILE手术。分别使用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和动态Scheimpflug成像(Corvis-ST)来评估组织愈合情况和生物力学。对OCT扫描进行分析可得出角膜散斑分布(CSD)和鲍曼层粗糙度指数(BRI)。对变形幅度进行波形分析可得出角膜硬度。此外,角膜力与角膜变形数据有助于比较这两种手术。

结果

两种治疗后BRI均先升高后短暂下降(P < 0.05)。然而,在6个月随访时,与LASIK眼相比,SMILE眼的BRI与术前状态相似。CSD显示,SMILE眼(1个月随访)和LASIK眼(3个月随访)术后,明亮像素数量显著增加,暗像素数量减少。此后,CSD分别恢复到接近术前状态。LASIK眼和SMILE眼从术前状态开始的角膜硬度变化相似。然而,在离散的角膜力值下的变形表明,SMILE术后生物力学强度有所恢复,而LASIK眼则没有。

结论

BRI和CSD表明,SMILE眼的组织愈合比LASIK眼更早。CSD结果可能表明LASIK眼的细胞死亡延迟,以及SMILE眼因界面液导致光散射增加。SMILE术后角膜生物力学强度重塑更好。这可能表明存在一些与水化相关的恢复。

相似文献

1
Corneal Biomechanical Changes and Tissue Remodeling After SMILE and LASIK.飞秒激光小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)和准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)术后角膜生物力学变化及组织重塑
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Nov 1;58(13):5703-5712. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22864.
2
Evaluation of Changes in Human Corneas After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Using Non-Contact Tonometry and Ultra-High-Speed Camera (Corvis ST).使用非接触眼压计和超高速相机(Corvis ST)评估飞秒激光辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)和小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)后人类角膜的变化。
Curr Eye Res. 2016 Jul;41(7):917-22. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1082185. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
3
Comparison of Corneal Biological Healing After Femtosecond LASIK and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Procedure.飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术与小切口基质透镜切除术角膜生物愈合情况的比较
Curr Eye Res. 2016 Sep;41(9):1202-8. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1107590. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
4
Comparison Between Q-Adjusted LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Correction of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.Q值调整准分子原位角膜磨镶术与小切口基质透镜切除术矫正近视及近视散光的比较
Eye Contact Lens. 2018 Nov;44 Suppl 2:S426-S432. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000532.
5
In Vivo Prediction of Air-Puff Induced Corneal Deformation Using LASIK, SMILE, and PRK Finite Element Simulations.利用 LASIK、SMILE 和 PRK 有限元模拟预测空气脉冲引起的角膜变形的体内研究。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Nov 1;59(13):5320-5328. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-2470.
6
Intraocular Pressure Changes and Relationship With Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE and FS-LASIK.全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术和飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术后眼压变化及其与角膜生物力学的关系
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Aug 1;57(10):4180-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19615.
7
Comparison of Corneal Epithelial Remodeling After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE).飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术与小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)后角膜上皮重塑的比较。
J Refract Surg. 2017 Apr 1;33(4):250-256. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170111-01.
8
Wavefront-Guided LASIK Has Comparable Ocular and Corneal Aberrometric Outcomes but Better Visual Acuity Outcomes Than SMILE in Myopic Eyes.在近视眼中,波前引导的准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)具有与小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)相当的眼和角膜像差测量结果,但视力结果更好。
J Refract Surg. 2018 Aug 1;34(8):527-532. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180607-02.
9
Corneal Densitometry after Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (Fs-LASIK) and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE).飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术(Fs-LASIK)和小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)后的角膜密度测定
Curr Eye Res. 2018 May;43(5):605-610. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1431288. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
10
Biomechanics of LASIK Flap and SMILE Cap: A Prospective, Clinical Study.LASIK 瓣和 SMILE 帽的生物力学:一项前瞻性临床研究。
J Refract Surg. 2019 May 1;35(5):324-332. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190319-01.

引用本文的文献

1
Time-dependent changes in corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction: an in vivo study.小切口透镜切除术术后角膜生物力学的时间依赖性变化:一项体内研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04260-z.
2
Comparison of Persistent Postoperative Discomfort One Year After Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction and Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation.角膜屈光透镜切除术和可植入式角膜接触镜植入术后一年持续性术后不适的比较。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2025.0062.
3
Air-pulse optical coherence elastography: how excitation angle affects mechanical wave propagation.
空气脉冲光学相干弹性成像:激发角如何影响机械波传播。
Biomed Opt Express. 2025 Mar 11;16(4):1371-1391. doi: 10.1364/BOE.557984. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.
4
Changes in the Concentration Profile of Selected Micro- and Macro-Elements in the Yellow Ligament Obtained from Patients with Degenerative Stenosis of the Lumbo-Sacral Spine.从腰骶部脊柱退行性狭窄患者获取的黄韧带中选定的微量和常量元素浓度分布的变化。
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 14;14(4):1252. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041252.
5
Determinants of Human Corneal Mechanical Wave Dispersion for In Vivo Optical Coherence Elastography.用于体内光学相干弹性成像的人眼角膜机械波色散的决定因素
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Jan 2;14(1):26. doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.1.26.
6
SMILE and ICL implantation on the ocular surface and meibomian glands in patients with postoperative myopia.近视术后患者眼表及睑板腺的全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术和有晶体眼人工晶体植入术
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec 4;24(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03790-2.
7
Comparative Analysis of Corneal Wound Healing: Differential Molecular Responses in Tears Following PRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE Procedures.角膜伤口愈合的比较分析:PRK、FS-LASIK和SMILE手术眼泪中的差异分子反应
Biomedicines. 2024 Oct 9;12(10):2289. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12102289.
8
Posterior corneal surface stability after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis in patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism.近视及近视散光患者行飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术后的后角膜面稳定性。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug 1;72(8):1118-1123. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2662_23. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
9
Changes in posterior corneal elevation after small incision lenticule extraction for different myopic diopters.不同近视度数的小切口透镜切除术术后角膜后表面高度的变化。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 18;17(3):491-498. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.03.11. eCollection 2024.
10
Kerato-lenticule Extraction (KLex) surgeries - Current perspectives.角膜透镜切除术(KLex)——当前观点
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr 1;72(4):459-460. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_675_24. Epub 2024 Mar 28.