Suppr超能文献

特邀评论:转基因和基因组编辑牛的繁殖和伦理观点。

Invited review: Breeding and ethical perspectives on genetically modified and genome edited cattle.

机构信息

Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.

Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2018 Jan;101(1):1-17. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12962. Epub 2017 Nov 6.

Abstract

The hot topic of genetic modification and genome editing is sometimes presented as a rapid solution to various problems in the field of animal breeding and genetics. These technologies hold potential for future use in agriculture but we need to be aware of difficulties in large-scale application and integration in breeding schemes. In this review, we discuss applications of both classical genetic modifications (GM) using vectors and genome editing in dairy cattle breeding. We use an interdisciplinary approach considering both ethical and animal breeding perspectives. Decisions on how to make use of these techniques need to be made based not only on what is possible, but on what is reasonable to do. Principles of animal integrity, naturalness, risk perception, and animal welfare issues are examples of ethically relevant factors to consider. These factors also influence public perception and decisions about regulations by authorities. We need to acknowledge that we lack complete understanding of the genetic background of complex traits. It may be difficult, therefore, to predict the full effect of certain modifications in large-scale breeding programs. We present 2 potential applications: genome editing to dispense with dehorning, and insertion of human genes in bovine genomes to improve udder health as an example of classical GM. Both of these cases could be seen as beneficial for animal welfare but they differ in other aspects. In the former case, a genetic variant already present within the species is introduced, whereas in the latter case, transgenic animals are generated-this difference may influence how society regards the applications. We underline that the use of GM, as well as genome editing, of farm animals such as cattle is not independent of the context, and should be considered as part of an entire process, including, for example, the assisted reproduction technology that needs to be used. We propose that breeding organizations and breeding companies should take an active role in ethical discussions about the use of these techniques and thereby signal to society that these questions are being responsibly addressed.

摘要

基因修饰和基因组编辑的热门话题有时被视为解决动物育种和遗传学领域各种问题的快速解决方案。这些技术有可能在未来应用于农业,但我们需要意识到在大规模应用和整合到育种计划中的困难。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了经典基因修饰(GM)使用载体和基因组编辑在奶牛育种中的应用。我们采用跨学科的方法,同时考虑伦理和动物育种的观点。如何利用这些技术做出决策不仅取决于可能性,还取决于合理性。动物完整性、自然性、风险感知和动物福利问题等原则是需要考虑的伦理相关因素的示例。这些因素还会影响公众对监管机构的监管的看法和决策。我们需要认识到,我们对复杂性状的遗传背景缺乏全面的了解。因此,在大规模育种计划中,很难预测某些修饰的全部效果。我们提出了 2 种潜在的应用:基因组编辑以免除去角,以及插入人类基因以改善牛的乳房健康,作为经典 GM 的一个例子。这两种情况都可以被视为对动物福利有益,但在其他方面有所不同。在前一种情况下,引入的是物种内已经存在的遗传变异,而在后一种情况下,则产生了转基因动物——这种差异可能会影响社会对应用的看法。我们强调,GM 的使用,以及基因编辑,如奶牛等农场动物的使用,与背景是不可分割的,应被视为整个过程的一部分,包括例如需要使用的辅助生殖技术。我们建议,育种组织和育种公司应在这些技术的使用的伦理讨论中发挥积极作用,从而向社会表明这些问题正在得到负责任的处理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验